The Cars Most Likely to Let You Down, According to New Survey Results

by TTAC Staff

Published: January 23rd, 2024

Photo credit: Prostock-studio / Shutterstock.com

In the automotive world, high owner satisfaction hinges on a simple yet crucial aspect: delivering what is promised to consumers. Vehicles that align with or exceed their advertised claims are often seen leading in owner satisfaction rankings. This observation is critical in the automotive industry, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling consumer expectations. In line with this, Consumer Reports has released a survey identifying the 10 car and SUV models that rank lowest in terms of owner satisfaction.

Measuring Satisfaction Among Car Owners

The gauge for owner satisfaction is derived from survey responses, where car owners indicate whether they would choose to buy the same car model again. This question serves as a direct barometer of whether the car has lived up to, or possibly exceeded, the owner's initial expectations.

Evaluating Vehicles Holistically

Owner satisfaction scores become even more informative when paired with evaluations of a vehicle's testing and reliability. For individuals considering a car purchase, these combined ratings provide a comprehensive picture of a car's performance and reliability, playing a critical role in their decision-making.

Survey Insights: Least Satisfying Cars

Recent survey findings have led to the identification of the ten least satisfying car models. This information is invaluable for prospective buyers, offering insights into which models may fall short of meeting consumer expectations. The list, ordered by the percentage of owners who would repurchase the model, is as follows:

Infiniti QX50 (25 percent Would Buy Again)
Volkswagen Taos (38 percent Would Buy Again)
Nissan Sentra (39 percent Would Buy Again)
Kia Sorento Hybrid (42 percent Would Buy Again)
Nissan Kicks (44 percent Would Buy Again)
Kia Seltos (45 percent Would Buy Again)
Mercedes-Benz C-Class (46 percent Would Buy Again)
Kia Forte (47 percent Would Buy Again)
Volkswagen Jetta (47 percent Would Buy Again)
Nissan Altima (48 percent Would Buy Again)

Making Informed Car Buying Decisions

The findings from this survey serve as an essential guide for those in the market for a new car. Knowing which models have lower satisfaction rates can steer consumers towards more informed choices, potentially enhancing their overall satisfaction with their vehicle purchase.

This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments

Join the conversation

2 comments

Fred on Jan 23, 2024
So unless we pay CR, we won't be finding out WHY people found these cars unsatisfying

Like Reply
Orangefruitbat on Jan 23, 2024
Stop these garbage AI-written articles.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).