Study Finds Advanced Safety Comes at a Steep Price

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Karsten Neglia / Shutterstock.com

As modern vehicles increasingly incorporate Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) for enhanced safety, a crucial aspect often overlooked is the repair cost of these systems after a collision. Research by the American Automobile Association (AAA) highlights that expenses related to ADAS can comprise a significant portion of total repair costs, reaching up to 37.6 percent. This high cost is attributed to the necessity of replacing and recalibrating sensors integral to ADAS functionalities.


Minor damages to components such as front radar sensors or distance sensors can lead to considerable repair costs, with figures reaching around $1,540. Awareness of these costs is important for consumers, emphasizing the need for timely repairs to maintain system efficacy.


The Critical Need for Functional ADAS

Greg Brannon from AAA underscores the importance of functional ADAS. As these systems become more prevalent, understanding the associated repair costs is crucial. Ensuring the proper working condition of these systems is vital for preventing accidents. Thus, consumers should be well-informed about the potential repair costs and the importance of addressing ADAS issues promptly.


Variables Affecting ADAS Repair Expenses

The cost of repairing ADAS varies based on several factors, including vehicle make and model, the type and location of the damaged sensor, and the chosen repair facility. The strategic placement of ADAS sensors around the vehicle – front, sides, and rear – plays a role in the repair complexity.

AAA's study examined various repair scenarios, like front-end collisions and windshield replacements, to deduce the costs involved in fixing these sensors. The study found that radar sensors and cameras damaged in front-end collisions incurred the highest repair costs.


Insights from AAA's Study

AAA's study, focusing on the 2023 models of Ford F-150, Nissan Rogue, and Toyota Camry, revealed:

  • Minor front collision repair averaged $1,540, forming 13.2 percent of the total repair cost.
  • Minor rear collision repair costs averaged $684, about 40.9 percent of a total $1,698 estimate.
  • Windshield replacement involving ADAS components averaged 25.4 percent of the total repair cost, equating to $360.00.


Range of Costs for Individual ADAS Components

The study also outlined the range of costs for specific ADAS components, including:

  • Front radar sensors: $500 to $1,300.
  • Front camera sensors: $600 to $800.
  • Mirror mount, side mirror: $740 to $1,600.
  • Windshield camera sensor: $900 to $1,200.
  • Front or rear ultrasonic sensors: $300 to $1,000.

These costs are additional to the standard bodywork required after a collision.


The Importance of Timely ADAS Repairs

When ADAS components fail, drivers are notified through warning lights or messages. In such instances, it's crucial to seek prompt and skilled repair services.


Methodological Approach

The study evaluated the 2023 models of Ford F-150, Nissan Rogue, and Toyota Camry. Notably, this study differed from AAA's previous evaluation of the 2018 models in terms of standard equipment, labor costs, and methodology. For a comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to consult the full report.

This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys so many people here fellating musks fat sack, or hodling the baggies for TSLA. which are you?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Canadians are able to win?
  • Doc423 More over-priced, unreliable garbage from Mini Cooper/BMW.
  • Tsarcasm Chevron Techron and Lubri-Moly Jectron are the only ones that have a lot of Polyether Amine (PEA) in them.
  • Tassos OK Corey. I went and saw the photos again. Besides the fins, one thing I did not like on one of the models (I bet it was the 59) was the windshield, which looked bent (although I would bet its designer thought it was so cool at the time). Besides the too loud fins. The 58 was better.
Next