Chevrolet Equinox EV and GM Electrified Pickups Delayed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Following news that production of the Chevrolet Silverado EV would be delayed, General Motors has announced that the Chevy Equinox EV would likewise be arriving behind schedule.

The postponement was announced as part of GM’s earnings report, with CEO Mary Barra citing improvements the company would like to make to the product as well as some market challenges. Some of that revolves around using the time to better manage capital investment related to EV demand (or lack thereof) while the rest seems to apply to engineering changes that might make the vehicles more profitable.


There was also some speculation about how the UAW strike may have impacted the situation, as Barra had already suggested the situation would eventually discourage investments. However, your author is disinclined to believe it played a significant role in this particular decision. However that does not preclude the automaker from blaming the strike later on, nor union action from impacting the company’s decisions in general.


“It’s clear that we’re dealing with a lot of near-term uncertainty,” Barra said in a conference call with investors Tuesday. “And then also ... the transition to EVs, that will have ups and downs.”


Conversely, the relevant earnings call does seem to have directly influenced the UAW to call for a walkout at GM's Arlington Assembly plant. The facility is responsible for manufacturing the Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Chevrolet Tahoe, Suburban, GMC Yukon, and Yukon XL.

GM reported a third-quarter 2023 revenue of $44.1 billion and net income attributable to stockholders of roughly $3.1 billion. Hours later, the UAW expanded its strike against the company.


"Another record quarter, another record year. As we've said for months: record profits equal record contracts," stated UAW President Shawn Fain. "It's time GM workers and the whole working class get their fair share."


While GM didn’t directly accuse the strike of having influenced its decision to postpone numerous EV production launches, it did note that it had endured an estimated $800 million in lost production and that was before the UAW had targeted its largest plant.


But the real issue likely stems from legacy manufacturers’ general inability to make EVs profitable. Demand seems to be plateauing on electrified models and their above-average price tags have not helped remedy this. However, Chevrolet had vowed that the Equinox EV would start at $30,000 and has remained pretty consistent in claiming that would remain the price throughout 2023.


But it remains to be seen whether or not that’ll remain true. Frankly, it’s gotten pretty rare to see an automaker adhere to the initial claims about EV pricing. Models frequently launch in top-trim formats, with entry-level models delayed indefinitely. Other times, the base model comes but with a noticeably higher MSRP than the manufacturer initially promised.


It’s my assumption that the now-delayed Equinox will see a similar fate. Though we’ll have to wait and see. The vehicle was supposed to arrive by the end of 2023 and will now be delayed by at least a couple of months. Barra likewise confirmed that the Chevrolet Silverado EV RST and GMC Sierra EV Denali would be coming later than expected to “ensure their success.”


The CEO stated that General Motors’ commitment to EVs was as strong as ever. But she also told investors that the company would be “moderating the acceleration of EV production in North America to protect our pricing, adjust to slower near-term growth in demand, and implement engineering efficiency and other improvements that will make our vehicles less expensive to produce and more profitable.”

[Images: GM]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Oct 27, 2023

    GM made a whopping 7% profit on their $44.1B in sales. I can earn 5.5% on a certificate of deposit.


    GM should shut down the whole operation and its investors should buy stock in Apple.

  • GrumpyOldMan GrumpyOldMan on Oct 27, 2023

    It seems like the raison d'etre of corporations these days is to pay the C-suite's obscene salaries.

  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
  • SCE to AUX Unresolved safety issues are a good reason to strike.
Next