China is Unhappy with the Inflation Reduction Act and Has Complained to the WTO

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Among many other things, the Inflation Reduction Act changed the way EV tax credits work in the United States. With an eye on reducing America’s dependence on Chinese batteries and materials, the Act incentivizes automakers to source materials from free-trade-compliant countries and build EVs in North America. Now, China is expressing its unhappiness with the legislation by raising a dispute with the World Trade Organization.


The Chinese Ministry of Commerce claimed the Inflation Reduction Act is “discriminatory” and said it has “seriously distorted” supply chains. At the same time, the U.S. is making similar claims against China, saying the country has used unfair policies to manipulate the global market in its favor.


Legal experts say this case might not be so airtight for China, noting that the U.S. will mount a vigorous defense. That said, the Inflation Reduction Act apparently does run afoul of WTO rules, which has already been pointed out by the EU.


U.S. politicians of all sorts have expressed distrust of China, and no one appears ready to go soft on the Asian giant’s EVs. The country’s electric vehicle industry has grown rapidly in recent years, as government subsidies and other incentives have driven research and development of new models.


While BYD, China’s largest EV maker, has said it would not come to the U.S., others might. Additionally, Chinese EVs are expanding their reach into Mexico, and some expect other brands to reach the U.S. by 2025 or shortly after. That said, there is still the matter of Chinese tariffs, which can add thousands to the price of a new EV as it enters the United States.


[Image: Tada Images via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 76 comments
  • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Mar 28, 2024

    In a communist dictatorship, there isn't much export activity that the government isn't aware of. That being the case, if the PRC wanted to, they could cut the flow of fentanyl down to a trickle. Since that isn't happening, I therefore assume Xi Jinping doesn't want it cut. China needs to feel the consequences for knowingly poisoning other countries' citizens.

    • See 1 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Apr 01, 2024

      @Slavuta a quite impressive job of expressing as many unsupported conspiracy theories as possible in very few words.



  • VoGhost VoGhost on Apr 01, 2024

    Interesting. Oil wealthy gulf nations, Russia, January 6 traitors, and now China all hate the Inflation Reduction Act. But who does like the IRA?

    - People on prescription drugs, because prices are coming down, starting with insulin at $35/month

    - Companies that run on electricity, because generation supply is increasing rapidly

    - People who like to have jobs, because of all the factories being built to make EVs, solar panels and batteries.

    - American consumers, who like getting 30% off the price of sustainable energy from solar

    - People who like getting $7,500 of their taxes back when they buy an efficient car built in America

    - People who like that inflation is now down to 2.5% in the US

    - In short, Americans.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 01, 2024

      Again, VoGhost, if you can just post a link to the talking points you are paid to work from and skip the acerbic commentary, that would be great.


  • 28-Cars-Later Used Teslas are getting very cheap, but buying one can be risky - Ars Technica Teslas are very connected cars, and many of their convenience features are accessed via smartphone apps. But that requires that Tesla's database shows you as the car's owner, and there are plenty of reports online that transferring ownership from Hertz can take time.Unfortunately, this also leaves the car stuck in Chill driving mode (which restricts power, acceleration, and top speed) and places some car settings outside of the new owner's level of access. You also won't be able to use Tesla Superchargers while the car still shows up as belonging to Hertz. Based on forum reports, contacting Tesla directly is the way to resolve this, but it can take several days to process; longer if there's a paperwork mismatch.Once you've transferred ownership to Tesla's satisfaction, it's time to do a software reset on the car to remove the fleet version.So apparently the state maintains title but so does Tesla in a way, and they cripple some features until they feel satisfied in unlocking them to you. How long till they brick it by satellite because, reasons? But yes, rah! rah! BEV! - its not a tool of tyranny at all, honest. Edit: Comment from the Ars forum: Happy MediumArs Tribunus Militum 19y When I got to the section that stated that THE CAR WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY CRIPPLED unless you get Tesla's acceptance of you buying the car, I got incredibly infuriated. How in the hell is this going to work going forwards? Is Tesla literally going to be approving every single resale of its cars from now until the car is totaled? Jeezus, connected is one thing, but having final ownership authority in the hands of the manufacturer and not the seller/purchaser seems horrible. 28's thoughts to Happy Medium.
  • Tane94 Subie has a cult-like devotion to its products, so it can do no wrong by being a late adopter in offering EVs. Mazda has rebranded itself from zoom zoom to affordable near luxury, with success. Toyota is most vulnerable to losing sales from not having EVs. The hybrid early adopters who made Prius their high-visibility flag bearer now have to look to another brand for a distinctive EV to righteously show themselves off.
  • Jrhurren The EV haters would keep complaining until prices hit $0, at which point they would proceed to complain some more.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Remember the Mitsubishi Pajero? 😆
  • Macca Judging by the atrocious reliability record and general lemony snicket nature of the ICE Wagoneer and GC, this makes about as much sense as the electrically-challenged Brit marques going EV. Upper trim interiors on the GW & GC are a case of 'nice at 10 paces' (or glammed up press photos). In person there are low-rent plastics throughout at critical touch points (center tunnel, seat & mirror controls on the door panel, for instance) where there is unnerving flex akin to a toy. Adding more screens when the main Uconnect screen is already flaky doesn't bode well.
Next