Rivian Drops Another One Percent of Its Workforce As It Chases Profitability

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Electric-only automakers are going through it right now. Tesla recently laid off 10,000 workers after posting disappointing first-quarter sales numbers, and now Rivian is slashing another one percent of its workforce after layoffs earlier this year.


A company rep told Automotive News, “We continue to work to right-size the business and ensure alignment to our priorities. This was a difficult decision, but a necessary one to support our goal to be gross margin positive by the end of the year. Rivian’s first 2024 layoff cut about ten percent of its salaried staff.


The automaker has cited rising interest rates and economic challenges as barriers to its growth. Demand for high-priced EVs is also slowing as the market moves past eager early adopters to mainstream buyers who are less willing to pay a premium to have the latest and greatest.


Rivian’s two current models are far from what anyone would consider affordable, but its next-generation R2 and R3 promise more reasonable prices. That said, we’re still more than a year away from those models going on sale, and the company needs to stay afloat until then.


Almost all automakers have struggled with EV profitability, as even Ford has reported severe losses from its electric vehicle business. That problem is compounded for electric-only companies like Rivian and Tesla, where there are no hybrids or gas-only vehicles to bring home the bacon while they figure out how to move EVs. Rivian has a compelling product offering, but it has proven difficult for it to gain a foothold in a market dominated by Tesla and more established automakers.


[Image: Rivian]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 33 comments
  • Shipwright Shipwright on Apr 19, 2024

    off topic.


    I wonder if the truck in the picture has a skid plate to protect the battery because, judging by the scuff mark in the rock immediately behind the truck, it may dented.

    • See 1 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Apr 19, 2024

      There's a basic layer of battery protection in all the trucks. You can get a second layer if you order the All-Terrain Upgrade package (which also gets you a spare tire and smaller wheels with A/T tires).


  • TheEndlessEnigma TheEndlessEnigma on Apr 19, 2024

    And yet government continues to grow....

  • 3-On-The-Tree My son drives my hand me down 2010 Corolla. I bought that car new and drove it from Ft Huachuca Az to Ft Leavenworth Kansas for the Staff college the to Ft Bliss Tx then gave it to my oldest son then my second son and now my youngest son. They all want the 2009 C6 Corvette and 2002 Suzuki Hayabusa.
  • Tassos BIDEN BRATISLAVA VIP BREADVAN ON STILTS!
  • Ted The automotive period we are in reminds me of the malaise era of the 70s and early 80s. Government emission mandates exceeded the available engineering capabilities of most auto makers (sans Honda). Mileage, performance, and reliability all decreased. It wasn’t until both fuel injection and electronic engine control became available that all three improved again.Seems BEVs are in a similar spot; battery technology needs breakthrough improvement, charging needs to be faster and more ubiquitous. As those things happen, BEVs will make more sense.Agree the aspirational mandates are ahead of the current technology and infrastructure.
  • Golden2husky This was a common topic at work - kids learned how to drive, and now another car is needed. I was amazed at all the excuses made about how their kid must have a new car. Used cars are a "risk" for breakdown, they are not as safe, etc...which is all BS of course. How much difference in safety is there between a new car and the same model that is five years old? Maintained cars don't break down very often. I've driven cars for far, far longer than most and have been towed exactly twice in my entire driving career (about 800,000 miles). While I wouldn't put my daughter into a 15 year old car and let her drive across the country, I would be fine with a 5 year old car that was well cared for. Let's be realistic - new drivers are likely to get into a fender bender - why do that to a new car. I was thrilled to get an 8 year old car for college back in the day even though my folks could afford to buy all of us new cars if they wanted to. If you Want to buy your kid new, go ahead. Just don't freak out when they come home with a fresh dent.
  • CanadaCraig Can you eventually go to prison for driving without a licence in the US?
Next