Automotive Execs Speculate About Hypothetical EV Camaro and Mustang Sedan

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

General Motors president Mark Reuss threw some shade at the all-electric Ford “Mustang” Mach-E by suggesting an electrified Chevrolet Camaro would not go the crossover route if he had his druthers. However, he still said such a vehicle would ideally seek to broaden the model’s appeal beyond the hardcore enthusiast base. In related news, Ford CEO Jim Farley recently hinted that there’s a Mustang sedan under consideration — noting that the nameplate would hopefully play host to a V8 powertrain for as long as possible.


The Camaro news is more speculative, resulting from an interview Mark Reuss had with MotorTrend about the future of the model. He stated that he believes the future GM remains electric and that a sports coupe focused on sublime driving dynamics and a lower price point would be preferable to a model that’s focused on lap times and output figures.


From MotorTrend:


Reuss said the price of the Camaro EV could be similar to that of the 2024 Chevrolet Equinox EV compact crossover, which will start at $34,995 when the entry model goes on sale later this year. That’s not any cheaper than the base 2024 Chevrolet Camaro, but factor in a $7,500 federal tax credit and the price effectively drops to $27,495, which would make this hypothetical EV about $5,000 less than the last gas-powered model.
Production of the Camaro ended in December 2023, and while there’s no immediate successor, nobody expects GM to walk away from the name recognition and reputation of the 57-year-old badge. Many outlets—MotorTrend included—posited that the Camaro nameplate would be revived in 2026 as a crossover designed to compete with the Ford Mustang Mach-E. From the way Reuss talked about his vision, we get the sense that the car-versus-crossover debate hasn’t been settled within GM.
Even if the Camaro comes back as a car, don’t expect it to be a coupe. In a nod to practicality and the fact that two-door sales basically amount to a rounding error in the U.S. car market, it would almost certainly have four doors. Reuss envisions a coupe-like design that also improves on the (woeful) outward visibility of the current Camaro.


Ford’s Farley seemed to indicate that the Mustang (which is still being produced) could be heading in a similar direction based on a recent conversation he had with Autocar. His take was that the Mustang would become a family of vehicles, which could include a four-door variant that rumor has it is already under development. But the car would need to retain the “performance and attitude” of preexisting models.

“We will never build a Mustang that isn’t a Mustang,” he told the outlet. “For instance, there will never be room for a small, two-row Ford SUV with a Mustang badge stuck on it. But could we do other Mustang body forms — a four-door or whatever? I believe we could, as long as these models have all the performance and attitude of the original.”


He cited what Porsche had done with the 911 while also creating a family of Porsche performance products that reach beyond any singular model. While Farley said Ford did not want to copy Porsche’s playbook, it does appear to want to target its business.


“But we wouldn’t want to do things their way,” he noted. “We want to give them a good, American-style run for their money … At our best, we are an irreverent company. We need to keep doing derivatives that will surprise people.”


The CEO felt off-road Mustangs were likely a little too far off course. But that striving for higher performance trims while likewise trying to create more affordable Mustangs were on the table. Powertrain options were also speculated upon, with Farley hinting that Ford would continue building V8 engines and manual transmissions for “as long as God and the politicians let us.”


However, the company already has one all-electric model using the Mustang name and hybridization seems like a given in the future if automakers are to have any hope of adhering to the absolutely brutal emissions regulations the industry is being confronted with.


Meanwhile, Ford will continue trying to offset emissions by building more compliance EVs it hopes will see healthy sales. But there’s also a sense that Ford is trying to sweep some of its less popular electric models under the rug by forgetting that the Mach-E exists.


“One thing I can promise, however, is that we will never make an all-electric Mustang,” stated Farley, ignoring the fact that such a vehicle already exists.


“I look at other users of pure-electric power such as Formula E, and even companies like Rimac, and I just don’t think that would be right for Mustang. Great for other Fords – look at the worldwide success of Transit — but not for Mustang.”


[Images: General Motors; Ford Motor Co.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on May 18, 2024

    A sedan version of either car makes it no longer that car. We've already seen this with the Mustang Mach-E and almost nobody acknowledges it as a Mustang.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on May 18, 2024

    Mustang sedan?


    4 doors?


    A quarterhorse?


    Ford nomenclature will become:


    F Series - Pickups

    Raptor - performance division


    Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUV



    Explorer - police fleets

    Mustang- cars

  • Jrhurren The EV haters would keep complaining until prices hit $0, at which point they would proceed to complain some more.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Remember the Mitsubishi Pajero? 😆
  • Macca Judging by the atrocious reliability record and general lemony snicket nature of the ICE Wagoneer and GC, this makes about as much sense as the electrically-challenged Brit marques going EV. Upper trim interiors on the GW & GC are a case of 'nice at 10 paces' (or glammed up press photos). In person there are low-rent plastics throughout at critical touch points (center tunnel, seat & mirror controls on the door panel, for instance) where there is unnerving flex akin to a toy. Adding more screens when the main Uconnect screen is already flaky doesn't bode well.
  • Ted Bryant HA! Taught my son on my 84 FJ60. One day coming home from baseball we drove some of his friends home. One kid in the back asked how to put the window down. I thought he was joking -- he never "rolled down" a window before.
  • Jeff I don't believe that a teenager should have a brand new vehicle nor should they be driving a really old vehicle. Most teenagers will not fully appreciate being given a brand new vehicle and need to learn that there is a responsibility to owing and driving a vehicle. An older vehicle especially one that is very old lacks the safety equipment that newer ones have.
Next