2023 Jeep Wrangler 4xe Rubicon Review – Charged-Up Jeep

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 4xe Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (270 horsepower @ 5,250 RPM; 295 lb-ft of torque @ 3,000 RPM), paired with starter/generator electric motor and transmission traction electric motor. Total system horsepower 375 @ 5,250 RPM; total system torque 47
Transmission/Drive Wheel Layout
Eight-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPGe/MPG
49 combined MPGe city/highway, 20 mpg combined city/highway (EPA Rating)
Range U.S./Canada
Up to 21 miles EV-only, 370 miles total (EPA Rating); 35 km EV-only/557 km total (NRCan Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100km and L/100km
4.8; 11.6 / 11.9 / 11.7 (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$58,595 (U.S.) / $64,978 (Canada)
Price As-Tested
$69,385 (U.S.) / $73,978 (Canada)
Prices include $1,595 destination charge in the United States and N/A for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

The first thing you should know about the 2023 Jeep Wrangler 4xe Rubicon is that aside from the powertrain, the experience is pretty much the same as it would be with any other Wrangler.

In other words, if for some reason the idea of a PHEV Wrangler bothers you, relax.


Yes, you get a plug-in hybrid setup. You still get Rubicon off-road capability, on-road dynamics that remind you of the trade-offs you make for that off-roading ability, and the now-familiar Wrangler cabin. Now you can run it solely on electric power for up to 21 miles and plug it in to charge.

I didn’t get a chance to take the 4xe off-road during my loan, but the Rubicon comes with all the off-road goodies such as Dana 44 heavy-duty axles at the front and rear and a full-time transfer case with a 4:1 low-range gear ratio. It also includes electronic front and rear locking differentials, a front sway bar that disconnects, and 33-inch BF Goodrich all-terrain tires.

While I didn’t take this loaner onto the trail, I feel confident it would do just fine in the back woods.

On-road, the biggest difference from other Rubicon Wranglers I’ve driven is that going EV-only for a bit results in relatively silent running. That’s about it.

Oh, wait, I forgot – like with most electrified vehicles, you get instant torque when accelerating, at least in EV mode. That’s a nice little bonus.

I don’t mean to sound sarcastic – it really IS nice that this Jeep is so silent sometimes and that you can summon up all 470 lb-ft of system torque from a dead stop. It gives you the chance for some seriously swift acceleration without making the fuel-economy sacrifices demanded of you by the bonkers 392.

Unlike the 392, this Jeep uses a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that works in concert with two electric motors and a 400-volt battery pack, plus an eight-speed automatic transmission. Total system horsepower: 375.

The problem with electrifying the Wrangler is that while there are some new party tricks at play that enhance the experience, the rest of the proceedings are familiar in both ways good and bad. You still have the on-road ride that reminds you the Rubicon is meant to tackle, well, the Rubicon. Bouncy and stiff is the order of the day.

Wrangler steering is much improved over generations past, but it’s still numb and artificial, though the heft is right. Exterior noise is still intrusive.

And all of these flaws are still willingly embraced because of what this rig is capable of doing off-road, and because Wranglers still look damn cool. Oh, and because you can go doorless and topless, should you choose.

It’s going to be the theme of just about every Wrangler (and Ford Bronco, for that matter) review that I write – these off-road rigs are quite annoying on road but that’s OK because that’s the point. They’re supposed to be. So while other SUVs might get dinged for these things, we chalk it up to part of the experience. Sure, you might buy a Wrangler only for the image and not for the utility – but you can’t say we didn’t warn you.

Speaking of warning, we can’t say we didn’t warn you that this Jeep doesn’t come cheap. The base price for my test unit was $58,595. In addition to the Rubicon items, that price included trailer-sway damping, Uconnect infotainment with navigation, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Wi-Fi hot spot, satellite radio, 4 USB ports, LED lighting, and air conditioning.

Options included leather seats ($1,995), a Cold Weather Group ($1,195) that included heated front seats, heated steering wheel, and remote start; a $995 trailer towing package; all-weather floor mats ($170); power top ($4,145); and off-road camera ($695). With the $1,595 destination, that added up to $69,385.

Your combined MPGe is 49, and your gas-only combined MPG is 20.

The question I kept asking myself during my loan is this: Does going PHEV make the Wrangler Rubicon better?

For those with a consistent place to plug in, the answer is yes – you’ll be able to save at the pump if you can maximize the EV-only mileage. The instant torque is helpful on road, and probably helpful off-road as well. The silent running is nice.

Then again, one can argue that a 392 Wrangler is also better than a standard one – it too offers prodigious power, and a V8 soundtrack is great. Of course, that version won’t pass many fuel pumps.

So it all comes down to use case. If you can plug in often and afford the higher MSRP, the 4xe will make a lot of sense for you and it doesn’t take away any of the Wrangler Rubicon’s core strengths.

You don’t need the 4xe. But if you have the scratch and the access to juice, it makes a strong argument for itself.

[Images © ]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 46 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Aug 06, 2023

    The ORIGINAL Military Jeep in 1941 cost only $650.


    Shows you how the irresponsible Congress and Presidents since then have RUINED the US Dollar (but none more than senile idiot Joe Biden and the Dems in Congress)


    THIS Week the US has also lost its once perfect credit rating. If you have not been paying attention, your 401ks and other investments (if you got any) have lost 10,000s of $ in just one or two days this week. (mine lost $110k!, and the senile idiot still has more than a year left!).

    But don't worry about me. Unless I change radically, from living WAY below my means, to trying to use them up, I can't take it with me anyway. It's more of an insurance, which can later (much later!) go to some good causes (and a few deserving people)


    And it is only 'paper losses', of course, But the implications of the downgrade of the US in the financial markets will be terrible for the average, hand-to-mouth, indebted Joe Sixpack. ANd especially his kids and grandkids...


    • See 9 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Aug 07, 2023

      You should do a better job managing your investments


  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Aug 07, 2023

    Who spends $70k on a hybrid vehicle to save money on fuel?


    This is insanity.

  • Fred No idea why someone would interested in buying this at the price point. I'm pro-ev but a quick search can pull-up a lot more value at lower costs. I like the Fiat design but I couldn't stomach paying $37k for limited range and a super tight back seat.
  • 28-Cars-Later For the you-gotta-be-rich-to-afford-a-cheap-car crowd, Versa is the winner here IMO. Buy it new and pay the $300ish (?) note, but enjoy at least five years with relative reliability assuming historical average miles. Based on MY19, Manheim expects the "S" to be worth $5,975 in roughly five years with "retail" value being $12,650. Nissan and other second or third tier marques will give more on a new trade so assuming 20 OTD with incentives its a 12K/$2,400 depreciation over 5 years excluding interest and it probably could be kept another year or two before the Nissan in it starts to show. Mirage in this comparison is the new buy used on the cheap and run it till the wheels fall off. I'm loathe to compare it to either the Panther or 240 (since I don't believe it could physically last as long as either) but something in the vein of car you could repair yourself on the cheap which was originally intended for Third World conditions. Based on MY19, the ES hatch is worth $4K even with avg miles of 72,740 and "retail" value at $9,650. I personally see it as lot poison and could see savvy buyers making off with one of these near or below wholesale while Nissan is a staple of the subprime crowd and is much easier to finance. MC beings up an interesting contender in the used Chevy Bolt, whose wholesale is $12,050 for MY19 in LT trim with avg lower miles of 33,017. While this is very intriguing, financing is going to be the story here since Nissan or I imagine Mitsubishi could put buyers into half decent rates despite poor credit where a Bolt is "going to the street" and getting whatever high rate is being offered now. Assuming one can handle their own charging, Bolt does offer a lower maintenance cost and used I believe buyers have a higher chance of a white collar professional's commuter condition than what they will find in a used Nissan or Mitsu runabout. The risk to our theoretical buyer IMO is that the Bolt will straight up fail at some point in the future, either not take a charge or even turn on and for the higher wholesale entry point I say the Mitsu is a better choice since it likely won't completely fail and can very cheaply be replaced. Additional: For your kid/nephew/niece/any "middle class" child, I think Bolt is probably the better proposition here but I'd be out of the trade in 36 mos personally. For those truly on their own with no emergency support system, I'd shy away.
  • Jbltg It's interesting to note that in the Japan domestic market, where cars are built to order and dealers maintain barely any stock, that there are many, many color options. Really good ones, but no one seems to bite. Most of the cars on the road there are the same boring colors that we have. Go figure.My pet peeve is black interiors. Too depressing, and shows every speck of dust and dirt.
  • IBx1 Dealerships flood the market with grayscale cars to commodify them and drive down resale value. Green and yellow cars hold their value best because they cannot easily be replaced, but you can throw a rock and hit fifty shades of gray.
  • SCE to AUX Appliances (household and vehicular) have limited color choices, that's why.But today, if you want a crazy color, just buy a plain one and get it wrapped.
Next