Consumer Reports: Most Reliable Car Brands of the Year - Find Out Who Ranks Highest

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Photo credit: PaulLP / Shutterstock.com

The automotive industry offers a range of options for consumers seeking reliable vehicles. A recent study by Consumer Reports provides a detailed look into the reliability of various car brands, helping buyers make informed decisions.


Leading Brands in Reliability

  • Lexus (Score: 79)
  • Toyota (Score: 76)
  • Mini (Score: 71)
  • Acura (Score: 70)
  • Honda (Score: 70)

Rounding out the top 10 are Subaru, Mazda, Porsche, BMW, and Kia. These scores reflect a trend towards higher reliability across these manufacturers.


How Reliability is Scored

The methodology behind these scores involves comprehensive surveys of Consumer Reports members, covering over 330,000 vehicles from the years 2000 to 2023, including some early 2024 models. The survey assesses 20 different trouble areas, varying from minor issues to major system faults. The final score, out of 100, is a combination of problem severity, track testing, owner satisfaction, and safety data.


Focus on Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

The study pays special attention to electric and hybrid vehicles, including new criteria specific to these types of vehicles. These criteria assess electric motors, hybrid batteries, and charging systems. Hybrids show 26% fewer problems than traditional vehicles, but plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles often score lower in reliability.


Reliability by Region

Asian car manufacturers lead in reliability with an average score of 63, followed by European brands at 46 and domestic brands at 39. Cars, including sedans, hatchbacks, and wagons, are noted as the most reliable vehicle type.


Highlights of Specific Models

In model-specific observations, Lexus's NX model scores average in predicted reliability, with the rest of its lineup above average. Toyota's 4Runner SUV is noted for its high reliability, while the Tundra is marked for lower reliability. Acura's RDX and TLX models receive praise for their above-average reliability.


This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
  • VoGhost Interesting. The maga anti-America crowd is so used to being brainwashed into hating Tesla, they didn't realize that it's actually the foreign automakers that use slave labor.
  • SilverHawk 2031: A Car Odessey"Car, Let me have the steering wheel."'Sorry John. I can't do that.'
  • Bouzouki Hmm. So, can this system detect the root cause of why the driver may be having a "bad day"?Can the system detect when the driver is leaving a GM dealership after an expensive repair (or maintenance, like clearing the carbon deposits on the intake valves of that direct-injected "affordable" 3-cylinder Trax for $1200), or when GM certified says "sorry, that's not covered in your "LIMITED Bumper-to-bumper warranty"?I wonder.Those experiences can make drivers angry and upset.
  • Sobhuza Trooper How Can Unions Break Through in the South?Next up: How can cancer tumors grow, despite chemo and radiation therapy.
  • 1995 SC So with a lease the better the car holds it's value then the better you come out since the lease is basically paying the depreciation over the terms of the lease, correct? Assuming it isn't a factory subsidized lease to move a bunch of turds anyway. So if one isn't sure if the company is going to be around lease end, wouldn't that kill the residual and make these bad lease deals (or worse than a lease on something known to hold it's value)? I've always looked at leases as something companies that needed vehicles did.
Next