Build & Price Appears for 2024 Ford F-150

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

A revamping of this nation’s best-selling vehicle (well, the half-ton portion of those numbers, anyway) is always worth a few words. The build-and-price tool for the 2024 Ford F-150 is now live, meaning we can poke around in what Ford asserts is a streamlined ordering process in which the number of buildable combinations has been cut by 90 percent compared to last year.


Make no mistake, though – there are still plenty of permutations, enough to confuffle newcomers to the truck game who are trading out of an SUV in search of an Even More Rugged image. Our nickel’s worth of free advice is to study the pickup’s window sticker as thoroughly as one would examine tax forms. That way, you won’t accidentally drive off in an F-150 which can’t tow the family RV thanks to the wrong rear-end gear.


At its core, a base regular cab XL now starts at $36,570 which is up from $33,835. However, that miserable naturally aspirated V6 boat anchor has finally been put out to pasture, replaced by the 2.7-liter EcoBoost as the new entry-level engine. Equally equipped, this year’s base XL is $1,450 dearer than before. Given the inclusion of other gear like the 12-inch infotainment screen, not to mention simple inflation, that’s within reason. Economies of scale are a wonderful thing.


Back in the mainstream, a four-wheel drive XLT SuperCrew with the short box now commands a minimum of $53,840. Equivalently powered by the now-standard 2.7L EcoBoost, the same truck would have put a $52,735 dent in one’s bank account. Again, reasonable jumps given the better infotainment as standard and the intangible benefit of lording your newly-styled ’24 over yer neighbor’s ’23, a truck which obviously must now be sent through an industrial-sized shredder.


Raptor is also up about twelve hundred bucks at the base level, while little-bro Tremor packs about twice that increase before any other options are added. Ford has rejiggered the top of its F-150 pyramid, with the Platinum sitting atop all alone now and not having to fight for space with the Limited. Presumably, moneyed types preferred the P L A T I N U M billboard on the leading edge of that trim’s hood but disliked the idea it wasn’t affixed to the top trim. 


What would this author select, given a mandate of keeping somewhat of a lid on costs and not going straight to Raptor? At the risk of sounding like an old man, an XLT SuperCrew 4x4 with the long box is appealing because I would definitely want the 3.5L PowerBoost hybrid engine simply for the stunningly affordable ($750) 7.2kW generator in its bed. Slap on a $785 tow/haul package for extra capability plus a $1,095 FX4 package to call it a day. And I’d add the $410 illuminated Ford logo because I am indeed That Guy. Leave the big-bucks moonroof and BlueCruise on the factory floor. Painted in Atlas Blue, that’s just over 60 grand with a few bucks set aside to retrofit BFGoodrich KO2s and color-match the bumpers on delivery. Until they decide to make PowerBoost available in a Tremor, it is my pick.


That’s it. Go build your own.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Sep 19, 2023

    You can't get body-color bumpers without being saddled with ugly black wheels anymore. I'm not in the market for a truck but I find that sad.


    If I actually did buy one I'd have to figure out a wheel swap with another owner.

  • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Sep 19, 2023

    Wow. To replace my truck with an identically speced one would cost 20k more than it did in 2015.

  • Henry The manufacturers should build what the market demands. Sedans are dying off because crossovers offer sedan ride sedan handling sedan mpg and MUCH more utility. When you look at a "crossover" its like the shell of a car from the 30s and 40s with an upright stance, great visability, lots of headroom and easy entry/exit while modern sedans follow the low wide slung back form factor of the late 50s to now sedans. I personally went from a grand marquis (awesome utility awrsome passenger room) to a honda accord (awsome passenger room crappy utility compared to a grand marquis) and when i think i could have grand marquis passenger room, grand marquis utlity, and accord mpg you know what I want? A honda crv. Thats why crossovers are winning. Theyre a better grand marquis.
  • MKizzy Even if the bulk of Malibu sales were to fleets, they were still a valuable source of modern affordable used vehicles for their second and third owners. With the most affordable GM and Ford vehicles powered by 3cyl turbos, used examples are more likely to be problematic. With the Escape also being dead if reports are true, the question is what comparable GM or Ford vehicles will fleet customers gravitate to post-Malibu? Will rental car agencies have to rethink their vehicle size categories as they're stuck purchasing lookalike compact CUVs.
  • AZFelix Sedans will continue to be replaced by CUVs and SUVs. The now omnipresent and bloated two-box shape will be considered 'normal' for passenger vehicles for current and future generations. The utility of the extra cargo volume of a CUV when compared to a three-box design may at times be questionable but they have some advantage. The embracing of the ease of entry and egress in CUV/SUVs by the elderly will likely morph into a disdain for the design by more youthful generations of buyers. What teenager wants to be caught driving a 'grandma' car? I suspect that this impression will lead to resurgence of trim and (comparatively) low slung sports wagons and hatchbacks in the near future. I look forward to their return.
  • MKizzy Sedans in general may make a comeback but only as BEVs and only if customers prioritize driving range over cargo flexibility. I think the moribund 2 and 3 door coupe and hatchback body styles also have a chance for a revival, even if they're in some oddly raised form, driven by falling birth rates and Gen Z/Alpha rejection of the CUVs they were ferried in as kids. Until then, the best case scenario for the ICE sedan market is it stabilizing as a few healthy-selling models much as the minivan market had done. Else, sedans will follow station wagons to become a boutique product sold only by a few luxury nameplates to affluent empty nesters or high earning households seeking second vehicles.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird Platfor Ms, be they for EVs or ICEs being flexible enough for different types of vehicles it’s not difficult for manufacturers to build sedans, as well coupes, convertibles and wagons as part of their product line.
Next