Ford Decides Against Dumping AM Radio

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford CEO Jim Farley took to social media on Tuesday to announce that the automaker is reversing a decision to remove AM radio from its vehicles. The alleged concern was that all-electric vehicles would interfere with the signal and that listening trends were moving away from the relevant bandwidth. However, opponents noted that localized emergency broadcasts frequently end up on AM radio and that the airwaves likewise tend to be home to political talk shows or religious broadcasts.


“We’ve decided to include it on all 2024 Ford and Lincoln vehicles,” Farley stated on Twitter and LinkedIn. “For any owners of Ford’s EVs without AM broadcast capability, we’ll offer a software update [to restore it.]”


Though it wasn’t just station owners and fans of AM radio that bemoaned the industry’s preference to move away from amplitude modulation. On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of federal lawmakers introduced a bill that requested the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require AM in new vehicles.


The “AM for Every Vehicle Act” cites the importance and prevalence of AM radio in rural areas and its historic use in disaster scenarios and emergency broadcasts. According to the Associated Press, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and National Association of Broadcasters praised the legislation, which was backed by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Rep. Josh Gottheimer, (D-N.J.), Rep. Tom Kean, Jr., (R-N.J.), Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, (D-Wash.), among others.


From AP:


Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., one of the bill’s sponsors, has said eight of 20 major automakers including Ford, BMW and Tesla have pulled the band from new vehicles.
“Ford’s reversal reflects an overdue realization about the importance of AM radio, but too many automakers are still going the wrong direction,” Markey said in a written statement Tuesday. He said Congress should still pass the bill to keep access to the band.
Ford removed AM from the 2023 Mustang Mach-e and F-150 Lightning electric pickups after data collected from vehicles showed that less than 5 [percent] of customers listened to it, spokesman Alan Hall said. Electrical interference and reducing cost and manufacturing complexity also played a role.
The company also took it out of the 2024 gasoline-powered Mustang, but will add it back in before any of the muscle cars are delivered, Hall said.


The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a massive trade group that represents most major automakers, criticized the bill, saying it was unnecessary. It noted that the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Integrated Public Alerts and Warning System can already distribute safety warnings across AM, FM, internet-based and satellite radios and cellular networks.


But things become a bit more complicated if the grid goes down or someone’s driving through a region where internet/cell connectivity is spotty and the above does not address the countless stations that would be impacted by having their channels made inaccessible on modern vehicles. While not nearly as popular as it used to be, AM radio still sees roughly 80 million people listening every month.


It’s also getting tiresome seeing automakers removing features from vehicles and claiming it's a sign of progress. While the industry may see the benefits of forcing customers into connected services that offer enhanced levels of data collection and the prospect of new revenue streams, consumers are growing tired. The downsides of permanent vehicular connectivity are becoming known.


We’ve already seen General Motors taking heat over vowing to eliminate Apple CarPlay from future products. The AM radio snafu feels related and feels like it’s going to be similarly unpopular. Drivers do not want to have preexisting choices stripped away or repackaged and then sold back to them. They want modern vehicles to add features and be superior to what came before or at the very least something approaching the status quo with a lower price tag.


[Image: Proxima Studio/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on May 25, 2023

    Alliance for Automotive Innovation = Alliance for Feature Deletion

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on May 25, 2023

    "The company also took it out of the 2024 gasoline-powered Mustang"

    • And now we know that the "all-electric vehicles would interfere with the signal" reason wasn't really the reason.

  • 28-Cars-Later Ford looks like they will finally join the club.
  • Tassos THAT'S what happens when you FORCE an Idiot Joe Biden EV mandate on the industry. Tens of billions will be lost and widespread misery. They will be LUCKY if they don't go BANKRUPT AGAIN at GM and Stellantis, or for the first time at FORD.
  • Theflyersfan This system would be in total overload from Washington, DC/NoVA all of the way to Boston, because it seems that every driver in that area is having some form of a bad day to a total psychotic meltdown. What's HAL9000 doing to do, recline the driver's seat, put some kind of aroma candle scent through the vents, turn on the massage seat, and give you some kind of "Demolition Man" YOU FEEL GREAT TODAY platitudes on the infotainment screen?
  • SCE to AUX The dealers could easily get away with two Level 2 chargers and one or two Level 3 chargers at most.Ford has bungled this from the beginning.
  • Theflyersfan Ford, it's simple. If you want to continue to only sell EVs that have some serious quality issues and are over $60,000, you aren't going to need to make many changes and add extra chargers and the such because you aren't going to sell that many.However, if they somehow come up with a plan and sell an EV that has all of the issues and bugs figured out, decent range, and comes in around the national average of $40-$45,000, then start installing chargers because they might just sell a few. But as all of the Ford articles have been showing lately, there's rot at all levels of the chain there so good luck guys.
Next