Abandoned History: Oldsmobile's Guidestar Navigation System and Other Cartography (Part III)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We return to our spicy Oldsmobile content this week, with the introduction of GM’s first publicly tested in-car navigation system, TravTek. Arriving in the early Nineties, TravTek was launched more than two decades after GM’s magnet-based DAIR prototype failed to make production. This time The General was determined to make good on their big investment. Onward, to Orlando!


As detailed in the last installment, the new TravTek system was installed in 100 total 1992 Oldsmobile Toronados in Troféo trim. Of those, 75 would be rented through Avis via its Orlando International Airport location. The remaining 25 were leased to local drivers who spent lots of time cruising the greater Orlando area. In addition to distribution through Avis, Florida’s DoT was part of the project, along with AAA.

The overall objective of the soft launch of TravTek in Orlando was to explore the feasibility of an Advanced Driver Information System (ADIS), and whether regular drivers would accept such technology in a car. A quaint consideration in 2023 certainly, in the era of the widescreen 4K dashboard. The DoT was interested to see if the system would increase safety and use of the highways, as well as its potential to reduce travel time via traffic information, which would lead to lower fuel consumption. 


General Motors maintained responsibility for the base system in the Toronados that provided the guidance and travel information. The Federal Highway Administration worked in conjunction with the Florida DoT and the city of Orlando to establish a new Traffic Management Center (TMC) in Orlando. The TMC gathered information on local traffic conditions from various government sources, as well as the Toronados themselves. Aggregated, the traffic information was then eventually passed back to TravTek to help users avoid congestion while driving. 

The final piece of support came from AAA, which launched the TravTek Information and Services Center, or TISC. The TISC was the hub for the daily operations of TravTek. The office assisted users and provided Orlando-specific information at the request of TravTek users. The aforementioned data from government sources also passed through AAA’s hands before being sent back to TravTek. 

Information was sourced from highway cameras, traffic signals, construction reports, and emergency vehicles in the area. This formed one of the key features of TravTek, way ahead of its time: Live traffic information and route revision. All information was displayed on the central 6-inch touchscreen in the Toronado. 


Routes were displayed via a purple line across the map that was constant and showed the start and end points of the guidance. The Toronado was represented by a white arrow, which moved along the purple line as the route continued. Also provided were distance to destination details and time estimates. 

Joining the car on the route map were small red stars that indicated accidents. Heavy, stopped traffic appeared via a yellow circle. And a similar-looking red circle meant a road was closed. Should a wrong turn be made, there was no automatic rerouting on the fly. A driver could choose between two fixes. The first was a New Route button that would set up a new starting point from the car’s current location, and reroute from there. 


Since it was a brand-new technology, AAA felt that more drivers might choose to call for help. The Help button on the map screen made an immediate phone call to the TISC. A live representative from AAA would use their computer to help get the user back on the requested route or start a revised route.

Estimates were not that precise, however, as the United States had a considerable technical wall between the GPS information available to the military and that available to civilians. The GPS would provide the general area of the TravTek-equipped Oldsmobile, and the exact location of each car was narrowed down from there via an onboard compass and wheel sensors that detected speed. The route was also displayed in turn-by-turn graphics as travel continued. 


Guidance was always supplemented with very synthesized voice directions that informed the driver of upcoming turns. Points of interest were available in TravTek courtesy of the coordination with AAA. Hotels, restaurants, and other points of interest were included with relevant names and addresses. Further details like AAA’s rating of each place were displayed on screen, as well as information about hotel amenities like a pool, or if it allowed pets. 

The information available went much deeper than one might expect from a navigation system of that time period, as there was a “Things to See & Do” category within a Services/Attractions menu. From there, a particular month could be selected, and a list of events like plays, concerts, and other shows would be displayed. Information is detailed enough to include exact dates and times as well as ticket pricing.

Once a point of interest was selected, a driver could then place a call to the business or place in question via the screen! A very unexpected feature at the time, the driver would then need to pick up the console-mounted car phone to continue the call. Such a call might have been necessary on many occasions, as TravTek did not allow the user to type in a particular address. 


Rather there was a list of streets within a 1,200 square mile boundary of Orlando. The TravTek would deliver the Toronado to the right street, but to find the particular address a driver was on their own. For the privilege of renting a luxurious $27,895 ($62,170 adj.) 1992 Toronado Troféo, AAA members who visited the Avis counter in Orlando paid $29 ($64 adj.) per day, or $139 ($309 adj.) on a weekly basis. 

Per this 1991 Avis ad (hard to find), the pricing for the Toronado was not outlandish as a Geo Metro was up to $119 ($272 adj.) a week in that year. But if pricing wasn’t the barrier, what was? It seemed to fall into two categories: data limitations, and the government. We’ll pick up there in Part IV.  


[Images: GM, YouTube]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 37 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Nov 13, 2023

    "on the route map were small red stars that indicated accidents. Heavy, stopped traffic appeared via a yellow circle". On I-4 in Orlando, you'd need a LOT bigger screen to show all the accidents and stopped traffic. This was supplanted several years later by Hertz "NeverLost" GPS system they charged like $6/day extra for. The forerunner of the Garmin and TomTom units that littered dashboards in the early 2000s.

  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Nov 13, 2023

    Funny, I drove by the old EDS corporate campus in Plano TX a few weeks ago. The place looks like a Government installation combining Military and Corrections facilities into one huge fenced campus. Ross Perot took GM's money and cackled all the way to the bank.

    • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Nov 13, 2023

      IIRC, they built the campus on Legacy before the acquisition by GM. They were formerly located on the north side of Forest Lane in Dallas, east of Hillcrest Lane. And yeah, it was gated. But nowadays, a lot of IT-related places (like datacenters) have high fences and gates. After splitting with GM, Perot founded Perot Systems in Plano, a competitor of EDS. EDS was later acquired by HP. I've been in the big building at the Legacy campus, years ago, for briefings with Dell and Intel (vPro).


  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next