QOTD: Does Tesla Need to Advertise?

by Tim Healey

Published: May 18th, 2023

We mentioned yesterday that Tesla is going to advertise more. But does the company really need to?

Tesla is in a unique position. It's gotten a lot of press over the past 10-15 years, a lot more than most startups. Most people know that Tesla is an automaker that sells upscale EVs.

Of course, most people know that Ford and GM and most other legacy automakers exist. But legacy makes continue to advertise so that the general public knows what new models are out. They also advertise deals to try and get buyers in showrooms while also trying to undercut rivals. There's more to it, of course, and I'm simplifying things for the sake of brevity, but the point is that even well-known legacy automakers have a reason to spend massive sums on advertising.

But Tesla has had a fair amount of success with just word-of-mouth and with its customers serving, in some cases, as unpaid brand ambassadors on Twitter.

Hype around Tesla boss Elon Musk has played a part in that, of course.

On the other hand, critics might argue that Tesla needs to advertise to overcome negative criticism that has been directed at Musk and his actions -- both as boss of Tesla and of Twitter -- and to overcome concerns about the reliability of the brand's cars.

There's also the fact that Tesla plans to someday launch the Cybertruck and a new Roadster. Given how delayed the Cybertruck's launch has been, perhaps some advertising will be necessary to overcome consumer skepticism.

So, what do you think? Does Tesla have enough positive buzz that it doesn't need to advertise? Is even the negative publicity good for the brand, in a way (all publicity is good publicity, et cetera)? Or does the brand need to advertise, if not for brand awareness, then to rebuild any goodwill that has been lost over the years?

Sound off below.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Tesla #QOTD #QuestionOfTheDay

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 29 comments

MeJ on May 19, 2023

I'm not a Tesla fan but if anything they should spend some money and update their current cars. I can't believe the length of time these have remained unchanged, or even refreshed...

1 Reply
ToolGuy on May 19, 2023

If I had an extra billion dollars lying around, I would start a car company and run it based on advice from the TTAC comments section and see how quickly I could lose it all. 😉
And by billion I mean more like 10 billion.

2 Reply
- See 1 previous
- Analoggrotto on May 20, 2023
  
  HAHAHAHAHA! Very well played !
  
  Like
- EBFlex on May 20, 2023
  
  "If I had an extra billion dollars lying around, I would start a car company and run it based on advice from the TTAC comments section and see how quickly I could lose it all."
  Ah yes because building what people want and building quality is so outrageous.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.