Electric vs. Gasoline Cars: Uncovering the Real Climate Savior

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Photo credit: Nick Starichenko / Shutterstock.com

Contrary to common misconceptions, electric vehicles (EVs) generally have a smaller carbon footprint compared to traditional gasoline cars. This advantage remains true even when considering the electricity utilized for charging EVs. One key distinction is that EVs produce no direct tailpipe emissions. However, the production of electricity for EV charging can result in carbon emissions, depending on the energy source.


The carbon pollution from electricity varies based on local energy production methods. For instance, electricity generated from coal or natural gas is associated with higher carbon emissions, while renewable sources like wind or solar energy contribute negligible carbon pollution. Despite the variance in electricity production methods, studies indicate that EVs are typically linked to lower greenhouse gas emissions than the average new gasoline vehicle.


The shift towards renewable energy sources further enhances the environmental benefits of EVs. As more renewable energy sources are integrated into the power grid, the overall greenhouse gas emissions associated with EVs can be further reduced. Notably, in 2020, renewable energy sources rose to become the second-most dominant source of electricity in the United States.


Tools to Measure Your EV's Environmental Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) offer valuable resources for assessing the environmental impact of EVs. The EPA's Power Profiler is an interactive tool that provides information about the electricity production mix in different regions. By entering a zip code, users can understand the specific energy sources powering their local area.


Additionally, the Beyond Tailpipe Emissions Calculator, developed by the EPA and DOE, is a user-friendly tool designed to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions from charging and driving an EV or a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). This tool allows users to select specific EV or PHEV models and input their zip code to compare the CO2 emissions from these vehicles with those from gasoline cars. These tools empower individuals to make informed decisions about the environmental impact of their transportation choices.


This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Funky D Back in our day, it would have been an old-school carbureted car with mechanical everything so maintenance would be easy and said teen would learn something along the way.Nowadays, I would get a reliable 4-cylinder car. They certainly don't need a whole lot of horsepower (and in the early 80s, when I was that teenager, there wasn't much HP available!), and unfortunately, other than basic maintenance like oil changes, filters, and possibly brakes.
  • IH_Fever Coming soon to a high school parking lot near you, with a flat black painted hood, huge wing, and a hole in the muffler...
  • 3-On-The-Tree Motorcycles can be dangerous but there ways to minimize the risk. While in Army flight school the commanding Major General from the U.S Army safety center briefed all the pilots on all the bike fatalities in the Army that year and 99% of them were caused from riders drinking and riding in addition to reckless driving. Don’t drink and slow down reduces that risk by over 99%. You can apply that advice to a lot of things in life. And yes I ride, since 1998. 2002 Hayabusa, 2005 Suzuki Vstrom, 2007 Kawasaki KLR650, 1977 Suzuki GT750 and 1980 Suzuki GS1000. No accidents currently.
  • Jackie morgan I have a 1983 S-10 Durango. Bought new 1 owner. Still in original condition. Garage kept no rust dealer undercoat. V6 automatic, longbed. Loaded with extras. Transmission needs work. Body in great condition.
  • Wjtinfwb We had a few 500/Taurus cars in the company fleet. If a long trip was on the docket, I always tried to reserve one as they were great road cars with a ton of room front and back and gigantic trunk. Decent highway manners and a comfortable ride. The high seating position came from the basic design of the Taurus, it shared structure and underpinnings with the Gen 1 Volvo XC90 and S80, I believe it had pretty good crash test results as a side benefit of the Volvo design. The most remarkable part of this generation Taurus however was it's incredibly boring and down market interior. Dull as dishwater.
Next