Is the Apple Car Still Coming?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It’s been coming for years and is rumored to turn the automotive world upside down. But the all-electric Apple Car has failed to manifest. We’ve covered the many hardships endured by the code-named Project Titan, which supposedly employed 5,000 people and was rumored to have roped in Volkswagen. But that was in 2018, years after the vehicle’s development cycle had begun and allegedly changed from a pod-like autonomous car built by Magna International to a corporate shuttle based on the VW Transporter.

The story of Apple’s EV has changed so many times over the years that it’s getting hard to believe that we will ever see it. But the latest from the corporate press suggests that it’s still coming.


Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives recently told CNBC (h/t CarBuzz) that he believes an automobile will be Apple’s next big product after the Vision Pro is an upcoming mixed reality headset.


“We think, 2026. It’s a matter of when, not if,” Ives said, adding that the market is underestimating Apple.


However, the last we heard about the project was when an industry source told The Korea Times that Apple was working to build up its Korean supply chain in 202 1. There were also rumors that the brand was in talks with Toyota and Hyundai Motor Group to help it commence production on an automobile sometime in 2024.


Subsequent rumors have posited that the project had been delayed due to self-driving technologies not having fully matured. We also know that Project Titan underwent numerous staffing changes and endured a couple of rounds of layoffs between 2014 and 2020. But Apple rarely talks about the program, with senior executives often failing to acknowledge its existence.


Apple’s secrecy about the project may simply be the brand wanting to steer the marketing or a sign that Project Titan has been struggling. Tim Cook has previously stated that the company’s focusing on autonomous systems. But stopped short of confirming anything about a prospective vehicle.


All we know for certain is that Apple once had a sizable development team working on an all-electric vehicle. Some have claimed it was supposed to be a test bed for the technology the brand hopes to sell to legacy manufacturers while others remain steadfast that the end goal is to deliver an Apple-branded automobile. The company has also filed for a slew of automotive patents since the early 2000s and most of these pertain to vehicle-to-vehicle communications or autonomous driving.


Despite nearly a decade of news on the project, there hasn’t been a lot of concrete information to cling to. The program has been canceled and revived more times than anyone can remember and Apple never seems willing to provide any facts. Perhaps, Wedbush Securities has an inside source.


There are other explanations for Ives’ comments, however. He may have simply needed something to say when asked about Apple. The guy has made a living offering stock tips and he’s not going to be able to pump Apple and be invited back if his response is “your guess is as good as mine.”


If you’ve never watched Ives, his favorite thing to do of late is to promote tech stocks and then say that the brands he likes are “playing chess” while other entities are still “playing checkers.”


Our advice is to take any news about Apple’s claimed car with a healthy dose of skepticism. While the California Department of Motor Vehicles has confirmed that the company operates a fleet of autonomous test vehicles, they always turn out to be preexisting models wearing Apple’s sensing hardware. It seems likely that the company is focusing on AV technology, rather than the fundamentals of automotive manufacturing. But we likely won’t get more information out of Apple for another couple of years if Ives’ timeline is to be believed.


[Image: withGod/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 32 comments
  • Ptcruiser Put a PTEazer nose on it and let Chrysler sell some. Make it a 2 seater with no back seats. Have two or three battery pack versions. Affordable 140 mile pack. 180 mile pack. 240 mile pack. All versions to offer plug in behind seats, pack plug ins under flat storage floor, for EGO batteries for extended range. Room for 4 or 5 across and 2 or 3 rows back. Apartment life could have two home chargers to charge up multiple EGO batteries. EGO batteries would recharge main packs when main packs are below EGO battery level. One way power draw. Since Apartment life is without charging abilities.
  • Varezhka Not the biggest surprise, considering that the new 500 is a platform sibling of a similarly sized (but dead) Opel Adam. And Italy, its biggest market, is not the best market for BEVs. Curious if it will be the same 1.2L I3 mild hybrid as the bigger 600.
  • El scotto Does it have buttons for HVAC and infotainment controls? Steering wheel controls count.
  • SCE to AUX Fiat USA is a joke, and may not exist in 2026. They could put a Hemi in a 500 and nobody would buy it.
  • SCE to AUX "CEO Atsushi Osaki said Subaru remains committed to its horizontally opposed engine because it's a brand-building icon....Mazda CEO Masahiro Moro said his company will develop future versions of its trademark rotary engine to run on carbon neutral fuels and combine with electrified hybrid setups."These statements say a lot about how lost these companies are.[list][*]Subaru sticks with the boxer because it's an 'icon', not because of any technical merits?! Sad - the boxer is a loud, inefficient engine - so they're right. Does anyone actually buy a Subaru for the boxer engine?[/*][*]Mazda predictably killed the rotary range extender on the extinct MX-30 because it couldn't pass emissions. That's the story of its life. It's a terrible engine, but Mazda slavishly wastes money on it every year.[/*][/list]
Next