Is the Apple Car Still Coming?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It’s been coming for years and is rumored to turn the automotive world upside down. But the all-electric Apple Car has failed to manifest. We’ve covered the many hardships endured by the code-named Project Titan, which supposedly employed 5,000 people and was rumored to have roped in Volkswagen. But that was in 2018, years after the vehicle’s development cycle had begun and allegedly changed from a pod-like autonomous car built by Magna International to a corporate shuttle based on the VW Transporter.

The story of Apple’s EV has changed so many times over the years that it’s getting hard to believe that we will ever see it. But the latest from the corporate press suggests that it’s still coming.


Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives recently told CNBC (h/t CarBuzz) that he believes an automobile will be Apple’s next big product after the Vision Pro is an upcoming mixed reality headset.


“We think, 2026. It’s a matter of when, not if,” Ives said, adding that the market is underestimating Apple.


However, the last we heard about the project was when an industry source told The Korea Times that Apple was working to build up its Korean supply chain in 202 1. There were also rumors that the brand was in talks with Toyota and Hyundai Motor Group to help it commence production on an automobile sometime in 2024.


Subsequent rumors have posited that the project had been delayed due to self-driving technologies not having fully matured. We also know that Project Titan underwent numerous staffing changes and endured a couple of rounds of layoffs between 2014 and 2020. But Apple rarely talks about the program, with senior executives often failing to acknowledge its existence.


Apple’s secrecy about the project may simply be the brand wanting to steer the marketing or a sign that Project Titan has been struggling. Tim Cook has previously stated that the company’s focusing on autonomous systems. But stopped short of confirming anything about a prospective vehicle.


All we know for certain is that Apple once had a sizable development team working on an all-electric vehicle. Some have claimed it was supposed to be a test bed for the technology the brand hopes to sell to legacy manufacturers while others remain steadfast that the end goal is to deliver an Apple-branded automobile. The company has also filed for a slew of automotive patents since the early 2000s and most of these pertain to vehicle-to-vehicle communications or autonomous driving.


Despite nearly a decade of news on the project, there hasn’t been a lot of concrete information to cling to. The program has been canceled and revived more times than anyone can remember and Apple never seems willing to provide any facts. Perhaps, Wedbush Securities has an inside source.


There are other explanations for Ives’ comments, however. He may have simply needed something to say when asked about Apple. The guy has made a living offering stock tips and he’s not going to be able to pump Apple and be invited back if his response is “your guess is as good as mine.”


If you’ve never watched Ives, his favorite thing to do of late is to promote tech stocks and then say that the brands he likes are “playing chess” while other entities are still “playing checkers.”


Our advice is to take any news about Apple’s claimed car with a healthy dose of skepticism. While the California Department of Motor Vehicles has confirmed that the company operates a fleet of autonomous test vehicles, they always turn out to be preexisting models wearing Apple’s sensing hardware. It seems likely that the company is focusing on AV technology, rather than the fundamentals of automotive manufacturing. But we likely won’t get more information out of Apple for another couple of years if Ives’ timeline is to be believed.


[Image: withGod/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 32 comments
  • CanadaCraig Can you eventually go to prison for driving without a licence in the US?
  • CanadaCraig To hell with the UAW.
  • CanadaCraig First I'll answer the question. YES. Toyota, Mazda and Subaru are doing the right thing. That said... If only those pushing for an all EV world would care as much about the 1 BILLION earthlings that make less than $1 a day.
  • Redapple2 All this BEV investment. A bigger impact (less oil consumption) would have been made if we had made PIG UP trucks smaller since 2000 and not HUGEr. (And raised gas tax by $2-3/gallon.)
  • ChristianWimmer One of my clients is a company that is actually producing eFuels in Leipzig. Yes, they require a lot of energy to produce but this would not be an issue if Germany had nuclear energy or used the excess energy from wind and solar to produce these fuels. In such a scenario the energy losses wouldn’t really matter.Also, I am told that nations like Spain or the North African nations like Morocco or Tunisia could be ideal places to produce eFuels/Hydrogen due to their abundance of solar power. Again, the energy loses here would not matter since the energy used to produce these fuels is essentially “free”. If this path were pursued, Morocco and Tunisia could become wealthy nations and exporters of eFuels and Hydrogen. Countries with an abundance of solar or wind or hydro energy could be producing eFuels for their domestic consumption and export.Another argument which to me is irrelevant these days ist the poor thermal efficiency of ICE engines (25-35% gasoline, 40-45% diesel). One long trips with cruise control set to 130 km/h and even the occasional venture into the 180-200 km/h zone, my fully loaded (with my gear) A250 (2.0 4-cylinder 224-hp Turbo) can achieve an impressive gas mileage of 6 L / 100 km. That’s phenomenal - I am looking at six 1 liter bottles of water right now and that’s all my car needs to travel 100 km… amazing.So, I am a supporter of eFuels. I love internal combustion engines and if we want to use them in a climate neural way, then eFuels are a must. Also, to me every ICE car is way more sustainable and longer-lasting an an EV. Mazda, Toyota etc. are making the right move IMO.
Next