Adventurers Take Nissan Ariya Across Globe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Following 10 months and over 18,000 miles of driving, a pair of explorers have completed an epic drive from our planet’s North Pole to its South Pole. That’s a helluva drive no matter the vehicle or conditions, but the team of Chris and Julie Ramsey chose to take it on in an all-electric Nissan Ariya.


Yeah, that got our attention, too, when press releases started cropping up about this endeavor sometime last year. Team Ramsey left the North Pole (magnetic) in the early months of 2022 with sights set on hitting the South Pole and claiming a world record for long distance driving in an electric vehicle. Actually, according to the crew, this marks the first time such a journey has been completed in a car, electric or not.


Two birds, one stone, and so forth.


The adventurers began planning what eventually became this Pole-to-Pole Challenge way back in 2017 after completing the Mongol Rally in a Nissan Leaf. That accomplishment, no small beans in its own right, was the first time an electric vehicle had been used to tackle the 6,000+ mile test which has had no qualms laying waste to far sterner machinery over the years.


As for this quest, Nissan insists the Ariya’s basics – namely, powertrain and battery – were factory standard with no modifications. It only takes the gift of sight to deduce there are obvious mods to the body and tire selection but those alterations are certainly not out of line with the prep one might expect on a rig intended to be driven from the North to South Pole. Those changes were undertaken by polar mobility specialists Arctic Trucks (anyone who’s watched Top Gear will recognize that name) to accommodate 39-inch BF Goodrich tires.


We’ve plenty of questions of course, not the least of which surround the issue of charging the Ariya in remote places and how its battery handled frigid ambient temperatures at the extreme ends of our planet. But in the moment, we’ll simply applaud this feat of driving – one which would be impressive in any machine, let alone an EV.


[Image: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • The Oracle The Oracle on Dec 19, 2023

    I’m sure they were pole to pole many times on this trip.

  • Abraham Abraham on Dec 19, 2023

    Me thinks they were followed around by a large diesel powered entourage and a not insignificant generator. And lots of cocoa.

  • MacTassos Bagpipes. And loud ones at that.Bagpipes for back up warning sounds.Bagpipes for horns.Bagpipes for yellow light warning alert and louder bagpipes for red light warnings.Bagpipes for drowsy driver alerts.Bagpipes for using your phone while driving.Bagpipes for following too close.Bagpipes for drifting out of your lane.Bagpipes for turning without signaling.Bagpipes for warning your lights are off when driving at night.Bagpipes for not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.Bagpipes for seat belts not buckled.Bagpipes for leaving the iron on when going on vacation. I’ll ne’er make that mistake agin’.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
Next