Federal Investigators End Seven-Year Scrutiny of Shifters in Ram, Durango

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Tall hats at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have indicated they have wrapped an investigation into the gear selector design found in some Durango SUVs and Ram pickup trucks.

At issue were Ram 1500s from 2013 – 2017 and Dodge Durango models from 2014 – 2017 in which complaints were made to the NHSTA about incidents of vehicle roll-away after the operator allegedly shifted the transmission to Park and exited the rig. Specifically, the carping involved multiple vehicles which shared a common electronic rotary shifter design. Fun fact for gearhead trivia: these dials are manufactured by an outfit called Kostal Automotive in Germany.


Way back in 2016, the agency opened a file to investigate 43 of these rollaway incidents. During the course of this study, the Office of Defects Investigation (there’s a department name, if we ever heard one) says they did not find evidence a vehicle-based design or manufacturing defect was the cause of vehicle rollaway incidents on the subject vehicles. They then reference a so-called Customer Satisfaction Notification – think of it as a not-quite recall – which provided “automated vehicle securement” when an operator attempts to exit the vehicle without successfully jamming the thing into Park. The CSN took the form of a software update and the feds seemed reasonably satisfied it was effective in reducing the frequency of vehicle rollaway incidents in the subject vehicles. 


A recall would have been ruinously expensive. Murilee has noted on numerous occasions the specter of Ford getting away with sending out stickers instead of actually fixing their rollaway issues back in the bad old days, though that problem was a physical defect and not down to a potentially confusing design of an electronic shifter.

This author will opine that he despises trucks which slam themselves back into park when trying to move forward or backward with a door ajar. Sure, it’s not a technique taught in driving school but negotiating one’s way up to a trailer while solo (despite the phalanx of on-board cameras) or any number of other real world truck tasks requiring craning of necks are often easier with a door open – at least for us old guys. You’d think giving the option to manually turn such a feature off, even buried deep in an infotainment menu, would satisfy even the most pencil-necked of corporate lawyers.


Still, all this confab puts a bit of polish on the argument that consistently trying to reinvent shifter controls can create problems. It's worth noting differences in this case and the one focused on shifters used in machines like the Jeep Grand Cherokee.


[Images: Dodge]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • 2manyvettes 2manyvettes on Jan 31, 2024

    I have had three of these ('15 Ram, '19 Ram and '16 Durango) and never tried to back up with the door open, so I have not experienced that particular problem. I have, however, left the shifter in gear more than once when I turned off the ignition and the transmission automatically shifted to park. The '19 Ram has an electronic parking brake that automatically sets when I roll the shifter into park. Personally, I have no problem with these shifters.

  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on Feb 01, 2024

    43 out of hundreds of thousands. Wow, something must be amiss.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next