Abandoned History: The 2014 VIA VTRUX Pickup, a Forgotten Silverado

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

A brief moment in EV history passed us by about a decade ago, when the little-known VIA Motors introduced their lineup of VTRUX hybrid-electric vehicles. Your author managed to hear absolutely nothing about this brand or its vehicles until a post on Twit-X a couple of weeks ago. This sort of topic is the very reason Abandoned History exists. Let’s learn about the world of VTRUX.

The story begins with a company in Utah called Raser Technologies. In 2009 Raser displayed a Hummer H3 that claimed to return up to 100 miles* on a gallon of fuel (*in local daily driving) when it was outfitted with the company’s range-extender plug-in electric powertrain. Raser went looking for investors and executives, and someone to mass produce their powertrains.


Enter newly retired GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz. Lutz brought with him other investors, as well as executives and engineers from GM. In short order, VIA Motors was established as a separate entity from Raser Technologies in 2010. Lutz joined in 2011, promptly after he retired from GM. The newly established company planned to introduce a whole line of PHEV vehicles, and their industry connection for completed passenger vehicles to convert (Lutz) was already in place.

Lutz was a staunch supporter of GM’s plug-in hybrid of the time, the Cruze-based Volt. The same basic principle was used by the VIA powertrain, and would electrify current General Motors vehicles. VIA saw an opportunity to capitalize on a new electrified vehicle market, while simultaneously taking advantage of proven Chevrolet underpinnings. 


To that end, the VTRUX line was announced circa 2011. Each vehicle would use the VIA plug-in powertrain which turned the existing gas engine into a range extender. Different to the Volt’s operation, all VTRUX models were a series hybrid: There was no mechanical connection between the gas engine and the wheels. That’s different to today’s PHEV models, where the gasoline and electric engines work together to power the vehicle as needed, while the gasoline engine also charges the batteries. 

The V6 or V8 engine operated only as a generator to supply electricity to the electric drive unit once batteries were empty. The traditional transmission in each vehicle was removed, and the space used for batteries. No matter whether there was a large V6 or V8 at the front, power was provided solely by the 402-horse electric motor which managed a respectable 306 lb-ft of torque. 

VIA said its vehicles would accelerate to 60 miles per hour in a generally unimpressive 9.7 seconds, and on to a top speed of only 85. VTRUX trucks (Silverados) were claimed to manage 25 miles per gallon combined. The VTRUX van (Express) was said to meet 30 miles per gallon. Both these figures pertained to the times when the battery was depleted and the engine kicked on to restore power. In theory the vehicles would be charged often to minimize the gasoline used by the engine. 


And the batteries would definitely need charged often, as the VTRUX line was claimed to have around a 35-mile range on battery power. When combined with the greater MPG achieved running the gasoline engine to support the electric motor, VTRUX models achieved a total mileage range similar to the standard gasoline versions. 

An additional benefit of the electrified VTRUX models were their electrical outlets. The trucks could power tools on a job site with standard 120- and 240-volt outlets. Said power was drawn from the 24 kWh battery. It was estimated that charging up the batteries would take around four hours.

Ditching a transmission and partial operation on electric power alone were the selling points for the VTRUX line. VIA was focused on fleet sales and a low cost of ownership. The math worked out (per VIA) that after eight years of use, fleet customers would save roughly a third on ownership costs. Things like fuel and maintenance costs were much less with the VTRUX setup.

For the conversion from Chevrolet to VTRUX branding, VIA took off the exterior Chevrolet logos and applied their stylized VIA and VTRUX badging. On test models there were also some very large “ELECTRIFIED” wrap graphics along the side. VTRUX often wore VIA center caps on their various wheel designs.

Interior changes were very limited, as VIA did not develop their own airbag cover or replace other interior badging. The gauge cluster was modified as VIA removed the rev counter and replaced it with a power indicator to show the vehicle’s current mode along with battery charge, temp, and kW indicators (in the wrong font). The rest of the interior was standard Chevrolet.

The first model to go on sale in late 2013 was the VTRUX van, an Express 2500 equipped with the 4.8-liter V8. In 2014 the truck was launched on the new Silverado 2500 platform which utilized a 4.3-liter V6. VIA had plans for a third VTRUX model too, the so-called “Presidential SUV.” 

Pictured in marketing materials, it was planned to use the Vortec 5.3-liter V8 and the Suburban 2500 body. But GM dropped the Suburban 2500 line after 2014, so VTRUX offerings were limited to two models. The company was more focused on the Silverado variant, and offered it in two- and four-wheel drive, and single and extended cab variants. The first to go on sale was the four-wheel drive crew cab. 

Given the value proposition, saving ⅓ on maintenance over eight full years, one might have expected the purchase cost to be a third more than a regular 2500 truck or van. But no, VIA needed to charge twice as much as a conventional vehicle to turn a profit. In 2014, that meant a $38,050 ($49,946 adj.) WT 4WD Crew Cab trim was $76,100 ($99,893 adj.). A fleet manager attempting to explain why vehicle budgeting for the upcoming year suddenly doubled must have made for a difficult meeting.


To that end, the VTRUX did not prove very popular. After a short media blitz in 2013 showing prototypes on old generation GM trucks and some light coverage in 2014, it seems VIA discontinued their PHEV VTRUX line in short order (2015). While they focused primarily on 2500 vans and trucks in WT specification, there were other examples specially ordered, like the Silverado 1500 Z71 shown.

VIA changed tack immediately after their PHEV failure, and began work on an all-electric VTRUX line with a proprietary skateboard architecture. Presently, they do not acknowledge their first generation of VTRUX on their website, which reads as though the current EV venture is their starting point. If you’re interested in what VIA is up to today we can certainly talk about that in another installment, but that’s up to you. Until then!


[Images: Raser Technologies, VIA Motors, Seller


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Ted Bryant Agree with Mikey.Manual. Any manual transmission car. 1) can't text-and-drive, 2) forces driver to pay attention, 3) perfect security because most thieves can't drive stick, 4) fun to drive, 5) friends won't drive the car (they can't drive stick), 6) compression start -- never get stuck, and 7) will always be able to drive any vehicle anywhere. Did this for both kids -- after a couple weeks of complaining, they finally got to it, and now only drive manual. And they are both great drivers. But their friends do poke them for driving stick -- "oh neat - a manual. do you bake your own bread and sew your own clothes too..."
  • Mikey My youngest girl ( now 48 ) dated a guy that had a Beretta with a stick shift. The Dude liked Beer and weed. too much for my liking..I borrowed my buddy's stick shift Chevette and give her short course on driving a manual .. I told her if the new BF has more than 2 beer or any weed ..You drive ...I don't care how many times you stall it, or or of you smoke the clutch . She caught on quite well ,and owned a succession of stick shift vehicles...An as an added bonus she dumped the guy.
  • Blueice "Due to regulation/govt backing, China is poised to dominate BEV/battery production, just as they do solar panel production, drone production, etc.Taiwan dominates production of certain types of chips due to regulation/govt backing and we saw how precarious such a situation is (especially with the PRC increasingly becoming aggressive towards Taiwan).That's why regulation/govt backing is aiming to build up local chip manufacturing."BD2, these businesses and or industries are not free market enterprises, buttcorporatist, bent on destroying their competitors with the use of governmentalunits to create monopolies. How safe are world consumers when the preponderance of computer chipsare made in one jurisdiction. Do you what Red China controlling any industry ??And it is well known, concentrated markets control leads to higher prices to end users.
  • Master Baiter I told my wife that rather than buying my 13YO son a car when he turns 16, we'd be better off just having him take Lyft everywhere he needs to go. She laughed off the idea, but between the cost of insurance and an extra vehicle, I'd wager that Lyft would be a cheaper option, and safer for the kid as well.
  • Master Baiter Toyota and Honda have sufficient brand equity and manufacturing expertise that they could switch to producing EVs if and when they determine it's necessary based on market realities. If you know how to build cars, then designing one around an EV drive train is trivial for a company the size of Toyota or Honda. By waiting it out, these companies can take advantage of supply chains being developed around batteries and electric motors, while avoiding short term losses like Ford is experiencing. Regarding hybrids, personally I don't do enough city driving to warrant the expense and complexity of a system essentially designed to recover braking energy.
Next