2024 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Review – Cheap(ish) Speed

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

For most car enthusiasts, a Ford Mustang without a V8 under the hood is sacrilege. This despite the fact that V6 and four-cylinder Mustangs have long ago shed the pejorative label of “insurance beater.”


The EcoBoost version of the Mustang has offered over 300 horsepower since 2015. Still, it’s the V8-powered GT that gets most of the attention.

There are reasons for that, which I will elaborate on tomorrow when the embargo on GT drive impressions lifts. For now, I’m going to focus on the four-cylinder – and tell you why the EcoBoost at least deserves a look, especially if you don’t have the scratch for V8 muscle.

(Full disclosure: Ford flew me to Southern California and fed and housed me. I did not take the proffered water bottle but did use the notebook they gave us to take notes.)

The changes start with the exterior, which has a more angular design – it’s especially noticeable at the rear taillights. The gaping grille is meant to evoke the first-generation Mustang, and the LED headlights have a tri-bar design that is traditionally Mustang.

Other exterior changes include a new rear diffuser and widened rear wheel wells. The rear overhang is shorter now.

There are two new available paint colors – Vapor Blue and Yellow Splash – and buyers can also choose the color of their brake caliper. There’s a whole new array of available wheel options.

Inside, the changes center around screens. Depending on how you option your car, you get either two separate digital screens or a one-piece curved glass screen with the gauges in front of the driver (duh) and the infotainment stuff angled towards said driver. Ford says it is using the Unreal Engine 3D platform that is used in computer gaming.

Ford claims younger buyers want to see physical buttons removed, so remove buttons and knobs it did. There’s a volume knob and a few buttons ahead of the shifter – a “pony” button is key, more on that in a sec – but most of the HVAC controls are now controlled by the touchscreen. The good news is that these controls work better than you’d expect – and they aren’t haptic touch – but it still feels like a needless complication. Please, automakers, leave us some basic buttons/knobs for volume, tuning, fan speed, and temp. PLEASE.

Digital controls may look a little cleaner, but sometimes simple is better – and digital controls tend not to be as simple as physical controls.

The steering wheel has a flat bottom for a sportier look, and the gauges are customizable. You can match them to the drive mode or pick what you like – including a setup that is inspired by, though slightly modified from, the gauges on the Fox-body cars that were in use from 1987 to 1993. You can also set up auxiliary gauges on the center screen or put the exhaust into quiet mode. Just press that “pony” button to get started.

There are overhead USB ports for those who like to mount GoPros, and Ford says it’s now easier to enter the car with a helmet on – you’re less likely to bump your noggin. I seemed to get in and out just fine with a helmet on during some of our testing.

For all that’s new, the car still has a lot of carryover underneath, and you can feel it, for better and worse. The driving experience is immediately familiar, with driving dynamics that feel similar to, but improved over, the previous-gen car.

The EcoBoost remains a way to get pony-car fun at a relative bargain, and a lot of credit goes to the 315 horsepower, 350 lb-ft of torque available from the 2.3-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. You won’t get the sound and fury of the V8, but if you can live without that aural experience, you’ll still have plenty of punch available to shorten straightaways in the canyon roads – or for freeway passing, which is how the power will likely be used 95 percent of the time.

The engine has a few changes: There's a new turbocharger, new port and direct fuel-injection, an external EGR, and an updated cylinder-head design.

The biggest bummer here is that EcoBoost loses the available six-speed manual transmission. This is not a surprise – and, indeed, Ford confirmed to me over dinner that the take rate was minuscule – but it’s still sad. Not just because manuals are more fun, but because the last manual-transmission EcoBoost felt a bit livelier than the automatic version.

Now, the sole transmission is a 10-speed automatic.

Before turning us loose on the famed highways in the mountains above Los Angeles, Ford set up an untimed autocross at Irwindale Speedway that would allow us to get a sense of the car’s handling. I borked my first laps – I didn’t see a cone and was just sort of cruising, with blissful ignorance, way off course – but once I got back on track after a polite talking-to, I found it easy to settle in with this car. It’s big, or at least feels big, thanks to the long-hood/short-deck layout, but it’s easily placed between the gates, and if you need to scrub speed, a quick tap of the brakes will get you back on line. The car I autocrossed had the available paddle-shift setup for the automatic, and it held the appropriate gear.

The car felt like it would be willing to rotate its way around the slower, tighter corners had I been a bit more forceful with the throttle. Weekend warriors who attack coned courses will still do better in a smaller, lighter car, but the EcoBoost can hold its own.

We were also given the chance to use the available drift brake – which is available with both engines, including with manual-transmission GTs. It’s not super hard to learn to use, but it does take practice to get drifting right. After a few runs I was making some nice James Rockford-style J-turns, but I never did get the sliding sideways stop right. Still, it’s a fun feature.

The EcoBoost was easy to hustle smoothly in the canyons. The steering does feel artificial, which is common with most cars these days thanks to electric power steering systems, but it’s appropriately heavy and accurate. I didn’t need to saw at it to make mid-corner corrections often. Generally, I could come in a bit hot, tap the brakes if need be, find the line, and keep it smooth through the turn while getting back on the boil.

I ran Sport mode for most of this time – though the car still seems spry in Normal mode.

The around-town ride is unsurprisingly a little stiff, though not too bad on smooth Southern California roads.

As per usual with Mustangs, the backseat is useless for adults, but headroom and legroom are acceptable for most adults up front. The passenger seat is especially accommodating to the long of leg.

Drive the car gently and the EcoBoost is quiet. The automatic shifts a tad harshly in Sport mode but is sedate in Normal. This version of the Mustang is really a sporty commuter car for those who don’t need to place adults in the backseat often – it’s not a pain in the ass in urban driving, but it can hold its own on a canyon road. It does, however, lack some of what makes us want the V8 – stuff we can’t discuss til tomorrow.

I liked the customizable gauges and the Fox-body setup, which even turns green at night, is cool as hell. I didn’t like having to dive into the menus so much to set them up, and I also don’t like how the home screen isn’t customizable. It would be nice, for example, to swap the phone “tile” for the auxiliary gauges.

The EcoBoost is available in coupe – “fastback” in Ford speak – or convertible body styles and in base or Premium trims. Standard or available features include the drift brake, leather seats and steering wheel, interior trim upgrades, wireless phone charging, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, the curved screen, navigation, satellite radio, Bluetooth, Brembo brakes, remote start, Ford Co-Pilot360, Nite and Bronze appearance packages, and 17-, 18-, 19-, or 20-inch wheels.

Other options include an active exhaust, a decklid spoiler, and magnetic damping. Enthusiasts will want the Performance Package that includes a 3.55-inch Torsen rear-axle ratio, 19-inch wheels, summer tires, larger brakes, performance brake linings for the Brembo brakes, wider rear wheels and tires, the drift brake, heavy-duty front springs, sport tuning for the chassis and electronic systems like EPAS, ABS, and stability control, and a larger rear sway bar.

One note – if you want the magnetic ride package, and I think you do, you need to first buy the Performance Package.

Yet another note: The car I drove was a pre-production unit.

Available ADAS features include smart adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go, speed sign recognition, lane-centering assist, evasive steer assist, and reverse brake assist. I found the lane-centering assist to be occasionally, though not consistently, intrusive when hustling the canyons.

The EcoBoost I drove was a Premium with the Bronze Appearance Package ($995) and active exhaust ($1,225), along with the Premium High options package ($3,000; includes Bang & Olufsen premium audio, memory driver’s seat, color accents, Ford Co-Pilot360, and illuminated door sills, among other items). Total with the $1,595 destination fee: $43,905. The base price for an EcoBoost Mustang is $30,920 -- $39,020 for a convertible.

Opt for a Premium fastback, and you’ll be starting at $36,445, while the Premium convertible is $41,945. I built a Premium with the Performance Pack, active exhaust, magnetic ride system, and Premium High Package for a tick over $48K, before destination, using the online configurator.

Fuel economy for the EcoBoost is 22 mpg city/33 mpg highway/26 mpg combined, and 21/29/24 with the Performance Pack.

The EcoBoost offers a lot of sport for a lot less money than the V8 GT. It’s almost like the LX was for the Fox body – sans the V8 option, of course. But those who want more power, a stick-shift option, and a true muscle-car soundtrack will need to add cylinders.

If you can’t afford a GT but really, really want a Mustang, the EcoBoost is a nice consolation prize. It will be a pleasant surprise to folks at the car-rental counter, too. That’s not sarcasm or a pejorative – I’d be happy if Enterprise threw me the keys to one of these.

Its biggest flaws mostly carryover from before – the backseat is a child-only zone and interior storage is limited. The newest flaw is that the infotainment screen can require some menu diving and some key controls move to the touch screen. Some of these flaws involve the standard trade-offs one must make for a sporty car, others seem like avoidable errors.

It’s not perfect. Mustangs never really have been. It used to be about style for the base cars and cheap speed for the more-powerful ponies. That ship sailed long ago – now the base car offers sport for cheaper, though not cheap, while the GT is more about pure muscle. Oh, and GTs are no longer inexpensive. You buy a Mustang, you know what you’re sacrificing.

And if you buy the EcoBoost, you give up a few things to the more muscular GT. But one thing you won’t give up too much of – driving enjoyment.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC, Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 60 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Jul 25, 2023

    Well, aside from getting lost on the track by not noticing the cones, I think Ford got its money's worth from this semi-rewrite of their press materials. A review it is not. But you'll be invited back even if all the sturm and drang driving stuff tou claim to have indulged in only happened in your head. "Tim Healey noticed understeer at the limit," said no independent headline ever.


    A 3.55 inch Torsen differential in the Performance Pack? Gee, what's that when it's at home? Nope, the 3.55 refers to the rear axle ratio, although I have my doubts you know what that means. This car technical stuff is hard sledding, eh? So darn much of it to remember! And you the mere editor of an automotive website wouldn't be expected to know such down and dirty stuff.


    The car itself looks effeminate, and the front-three-quarter view shows that the wheelbase is too long for the styling, with the aft end not sitting well with the rest of the car. The interior is indescribably awful cheap black and shiny! plastic vinyl. Well, after all, this 4 cylinder model is Ford's rental special for the airport counter, usually in structurally weak convertible form that flexes with the road. So who cares, beyond the rental companies who charge a premium for renting this dross? It's their money-making baby for trying to be cool uninformed vacationers in Florida and they got what they wanted, more of the same but new, shinier and worse.




    • See 3 previous
    • SPPPP SPPPP on Jul 25, 2023

      He's being rude, but to be fair, it was a technical error, and it's actually still there. There is nothing "3.55 inch" in the rear end. It's a 3.55:1 ratio gearset in an 8.8 inch housing. The "8.8-inch rear end" has been around since the Fox-body Mustang. But Ford has upgraded it over the years, and is calling this version since 2015 the "Super 8.8". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_8.8_axle




  • Gary Gary on Aug 01, 2023

    This piece is just full of errors, even on things as simple as design elements ("traditional" three-headlight front-end design? I can't recall another Mustang having three lamps per side, unless you count the triple scallops flanking the grille. And the grille evokes second-gen Mustangs, not first.) Technical errors, too. Ford should have paid to keep this writer home.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next