Scrapyard Find: 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

I took a four-day trip to Northern England a couple of weeks ago, primarily to visit one of the only American-style self-service junkyards in the UK. While there, I also dropped by quite a few traditional dismantlers (known as "breaker's yards" over there), and one of them was Sherburn Motor Spares in Leeds, a business specializing in Italian and French vehicles. While there, I found a special-edition Alfa Romeo that never made it to our side of the Atlantic: a UK-only Brera S, hot-rodded by Prodrive.

While I feel that the ex-Royal Mail Peugeot Bipper we saw last week was a deeply interesting Junkyard Find, some readers with shallower more mainstream tastes in automobiles might have been disappointed by such a machine being considered worthy of admiration. For those readers, we offer this extremely rare Alfa that by all rights never should have met a fate such as this.

First, though, I suggest that you begin playing The Who's best album at top— and I mean eardrum-slaughtering— volume before starting to read this, because when in Leeds

Sherburn Motor Spares specialises in Italian and French cars, with a focus on Alfa Romeos. When I arrived, it was a below-freezing Yorkshire morning and the employees were huddled around a barrel full of burning trash to warm up. It was all very Dickensian.

One of the more civilised things about the breaker's yards around Leeds is that most of them have little cafes in double-wides nearby. You can get a bacon-and-sausage sandwich for just £4.20, and add a hot cup of tea for another £1.70.

Though The Who recorded their finest album in Leeds, they were from way down south in London. Once you're done with "Live at Leeds," I suggest that you play some music by Throbbing Gristle, an outfit of genuine Yorkshiremen that came out of Kingston Upon Hull, just to the west of Sherburn Motor Spares.

Most of the inventory at this yard is stacked two or three layers tall, with Fiat Pandas and 500s plus endless commuter-grade Citroëns and Peugeots predominating. But if you poke around a little bit and chat with the very friendly employees, you'll find the special stuff.

The Brera coupe was on the same platform as the Spider roadster, and was built for the 2005 through 2010 model years.

The Top Gear crew really wet their pants over the Brera, which was a beautiful machine for its price.

This one isn't just any Brera, however. It's one of just 500 examples of the Brera S upgraded by Prodrive.

The Brera S was available only in the United Kingdom, and its price tag with the four-cylinder engine was £24,950 (about £38,102 in 2024 pounds, or $48,438 in today's dollars).

The Prodrive upgrades went into the suspension; the 256-horse 3.2-liter V6 was the most powerful engine you could get in the Brera S. This car has the 182-horsepower 2.2-liter straight-four.

Customers have bought the front grille and bumper, but the rest of the parts remain available for purchase.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

2009 Alfa Romeo Brera S in English scrapyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Jan 29, 2024

    I was under the impression that UK drivers were much better than American drivers. Based on the above photos and corresponding links, I'm not so sure!!!

    I realize most of these vehicles are 500 lbs to 750 lbs lighter than Detroit Iron, but they look like true crunch boxes!!!! 🚗🚗🚗

    • Felice Graziano Felice Graziano on Feb 01, 2024

      The Brera & its 159 stablemate are notoriously overbuilt & heavy. Whilst filming Quantum of Solace a 159 went headlong under a truck with the driver still in it. He survived and the failed stunt made into the film.


  • Michael Michael on Feb 21, 2024

    It's a crime it's a pity, it's a low down dirty shame ... .


    thou shall not kill .

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next