2023 Nissan Z Review - Skips, Pops, Noise, Fuzz, And Joy

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn

Fast Facts

2023 Nissan Z Performance Fast Facts

Powertrain
3.0-liter twin-turbocharged V6 (400 horsepower @ 6,400 RPM, 350 lb-ft @ 1,600 RPM)
Transmission
Six-speed manual transmission, rear-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
18 city / 24 highway / 20 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
13.4 city / 10.0 highway / 11.9 combined. (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$51,015 US / $64,223 CAN
As-Tested Price
$52,360 US / $65,032 CAN
Prices include $1,025 destination charge in the United States and $2,225 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

I recall reading reviews of the Nissan GT-R back in 2008 when it debuted - holy crap, that car is STILL being built! - where it was labeled a digital car for the PlayStation generation. This was often ascribed to the big screen in the center console which allowed for the tweaking of various settings. Reviewers often lamented these changes as a drift away from a traditional enthusiast vibe. It’s funny to see that nearly every sporty car on the road has followed this path of high-tech performance.


And, indeed, there remains a big screen atop the dash in the 2023 Nissan Z. Yet I feel this is perhaps one of the last genuinely analog sports cars around. In a world dominated by ones and zeroes, there are still those who prefer to indulge in film cameras and vinyl records. The Z is a trip to a time when holding something tangible was worth something, and embracing imperfections was better than chasing theoretical perfection.


The newest Z has been a relatively rare sight on our roads, even though it’s technically been available since the spring of 2022. Production issues have apparently been to blame, though the double-headed monster of inflation and dealer markups have certainly made the Z a much less justifiable purchase than in years past. It’s not cheap, that’s for certain. But these days, nothing is cheap, and those with the means have fewer choices for a genuinely fun toy car at something approaching a reasonable price. 

This is the first Z for the US since 1996 with a turbocharger from the factory - and, indeed, for the first time ever, a model of Z where turbocharging is the only option. That explains the nomenclature, whereas every model of Z in the past has been prefixed with a number signifying the engine’s displacement (370Z was 3.7 liters, for example) this three-liter turbo V6 might have sounded like a downgrade in the eyes of the unaware if it had been “properly” labeled a 300Z. But 400 horsepower is certainly an upgrade, as is the engine noise as the old naturally-aspirated V6 wasn’t the most pleasant-sounding mill out there. Sticking a couple of snails on the back end quiets the most objectionable sounds while making more antisocial power.

No, it’s not a new platform. It’s still a Z34 chassis beneath, revised a bit since the old car basically dates to 2008. But it’s more stiff and quieter than the old Z, giving a bit more refinement in day-to-day driving. The Z, even with what has been dubbed as the “millennial anti-theft device” known as a manual transmission, is perfectly competent in daily driving. It’s plenty comfortable in a commute - who needs a three-row crossover when it’s just you driving to work?

But God, does the Z shine when the roads lead somewhere other than the office. I’m blessed with Appalachian foothills less than an hour (if I’m a bit liberal with adherence to posted limits) from my front door. Here, where the data coverage is as sparse as the traffic, the Z shines. While safety features like traction and stability control remain watchful, the rear wheels can dance if you wish. As the mythical British mags liked to say, a dab of opposite lock made for a tingle in the spine when midcorner gravel appeared around an apex obscured by elm branches. The effortless torque from the turbo six gave all the confidence in the world no matter which cog was selected - I’d often find myself absentmindedly in fourth rather than second, pulling away with minimal effort even when I was in the wrong gear.

There remain two real competitors in this price range - the Supra and the Mustang. On paper, both are probably superior sports cars. On track, lap times probably give the edge to the latest Mustang, and the Z seems to lag a tenth behind the Supra, give or take, in every timed test I see. I’ve yet to sample the ‘24 Mustang, but the guttural thrill of a wide-open V8 is still hard to resist. But my experience with Mustangs reminds me that they generally feel just a bit bigger and more ponderous than a Z or a Supra.


The Toyota, however, sadly feels a bit numb compared to the Z. Perhaps that’s down to the German roots of the Supra, but I feel less connected to the road when I’m piloting the Toyota. The Z, on the other hand, feels one with the twisties. Life isn’t a racetrack, after all, and chasing lap times isn’t everything.

Do sports cars matter to younger people in these days where electrification is the rage and nobody can afford to buy new anyhow? I’m not sure. Anecdotally, however, I got plenty of comments and thumbs-up as I drove the 2023 Nissan Z around town. I even encountered a young man - not much more than twenty, I’d wager - who chatted with me excitedly while I pumped the Z full of fuel. Enthusiasts remain out there who are aware of sports cars and aspire to own one someday. They too feel the impending doom of numb, soulless people movers and want to feel something tangible when they go for a drive. They crave the spark of excitement when they drop the needle on an LP, and they crave the adrenaline rush when they drop the hammer in something that moves them.

[Images: © 2023 Chris Tonn/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 31 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Dec 08, 2023

    Eh, still a Nissan. Nope.

    • Drew8MR Drew8MR on Dec 11, 2023

      LOL, a Corvette is 100% a Chevy. Roll up to a valet somewhere fancy and watch them drive it down the street to park it out of sight.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Dec 08, 2023

    Awww my first comment got deleted


    Take your “millennial anti theft device” trope and wake up to the fact that we’re the only ones keeping manuals around.

    • Mike Beranek Mike Beranek on Dec 09, 2023

      Its amazing how many boomers don't realize that most mellinials are in their 40s now.


  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next