Junkyard Find: 1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 Mystery Machine

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Chrysler Corporation sold vans based on the B-Series platform from the 1971 through 2003 model years, giving them Dodge, Plymouth and Fargo badging along the way. Today's Junkyard Find is a first-generation B-van, found in a Colorado boneyard.

The Mystery Machine from the "Scooby-Doo" animated series has inspired countless van owners to slather on various blue/green/yellow/whatever paint schemes over the decades, and that's what happened to this Tradesman.

I was three years old when the "Scooby Doo, Where Are You!" series launched, but I managed to avoid it for my entire Generation X childhood (though I was heavily influenced by Simon Bar Sinister's brain-reprogramming Phoney Booths in "Underdog" at that time).

Working as a wise and respected judge for the 24 Hours of Lemons Supreme Court since 2008, I've seen plenty of Mystery Machine-themed race cars, including some genuine vans.

You can get away with a Mystery Machine race wagon, too, as long as the team's costumes measure up.

A Sentra Mystery Machine? Why not?

Subaru Mystery Machine? Sure!

You get the idea. And yet with all the Mystery Machines I've seen on race tracks and at car shows, today's '77 Tradesman is the first Mystery Machine I've documented in a junkyard.

Maybe they just don't get thrown away, unlike Kidnapper Vans (this one got discarded in a Northern California yard back in 2007 or so).

This Tradesman got a mild camper conversion at some point.

It has wood paneling, mismatched junkyard-obtained captain's chairs and break-in-proof rear windows.

For the 1971 through 1980 model years, the passenger versions of these vans were given Sportsman badging, while the cargo versions were Tradesmen. The Tradesmen were preferred for customizing, because the windowless side sheet metal provided more space for airbrush murals and bubble windows shaped like hearts or pot leaves.

For 1981, the passenger B-Series vans became Ram Wagons and the cargo versions became Ram Vans.

Production continued through 2003, though major revisions took place in 1998 and body components from those vans won't swap with the 1971-1997 vans (underneath the skin, the chassis remained more or less unchanged).

Ford and GM stuck with their B-Series competitors for similar spans. Ford's E-Series (best known as the Econoline) stayed about the same from the 1975 through 1991 model years, then lived on a version of the original chassis through 2014. General Motors built the G-Series Sportvan/ Rally/ Chevy Van/ Vandura in essentially the same form from 1971 through 1996.

The build tag says it was built at St. Louis Assembly, and that its first engine was a 318-cubic-inch V8 with one-barrel carburetor.

This is a Chrysler LA small-block for sure, and that's a Carter BBD one-barrel carburetor, so it could be the original engine.

Instead of the base three-speed column-shift manual, this van has the optional three-speed automatic. Such luxury! Chrysler went to four-on-the-floor rigs for their three-pedal B-vans a few years later, with the shifter mounted where the driver had to reach back for it.

It's rusty in the usual spots, and there's not much demand for Malaise Era Mystery Machines with 150-horsepower smog V8s. Next stop: The Crusher!

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • THX1136 THX1136 on Apr 22, 2024

    A band I played in during the early 70's had an older 60's Econoline (side door and the stylized front headlights). Starting out we could get everything in it along with all 4 of us - cramped, but it worked. When we added VOTT cabs for PA we had to get a larger vehicle. Our bass player purchased a new Chevy van in '73 which allowed us to still fit most of the gear in although the drums rode separate. Even then the stuff was nearly stacked to the ceiling.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Apr 22, 2024

    In the mid-'70s I drove a first year model. It got the job done, and it was durable and reliable. That was the time when Chrysler stopped making the durable, reliable Dart/Valiant, and replaced it with the Aspen/Volare. The trucks took longer,

    • Jeff Jeff on Apr 23, 2024

      That was truly a dark period in Chrysler when the Dart/Valiant went away. Chrysler quality which wasn't the greatest took a bigger nose dive by the mid to late 70s. Chrysler bankruptcy and the Government loan guarantee of 1.5 billion in 1980.


  • MacTassos Bagpipes. And loud ones at that.Bagpipes for back up warning sounds.Bagpipes for horns.Bagpipes for yellow light warning alert and louder bagpipes for red light warnings.Bagpipes for drowsy driver alerts.Bagpipes for using your phone while driving.Bagpipes for following too close.Bagpipes for drifting out of your lane.Bagpipes for turning without signaling.Bagpipes for warning your lights are off when driving at night.Bagpipes for not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.Bagpipes for seat belts not buckled.Bagpipes for leaving the iron on when going on vacation. I’ll ne’er make that mistake agin’.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
Next