Junkyard Find: 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Honda beat everybody to the production gasoline-electric hybrid game in the United States, putting the Insight in showrooms in 1999. Toyota followed with the Prius a year later, but it took GM until 2006 to introduce its first true gasoline-electric hybrid here. That car was the 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line, and I managed to find one in a Denver-area car graveyard recently.

Our nameless reviewer felt, back in 2006, that the Vue's panel gaps made it the "automotive equivalent of a shotgun shack" and calculated that the Green Line version would require 90,000 miles of driving with $2.15/gallon gas in order to recoup its cost over the pure-gazzoline version. In fact, fuel prices went insane right around the time that review was written.

If we look at the fine print, GM actually introduced a sort-of-a-hybrid vehicle as a 2004 model, though the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid/GMC Sierra Hybrid didn't have regenerative braking.

Ford launched the Escape Hybrid as a 2005 model (its Mercury Mariner and Mazda Tribute siblings showed up a bit later), so The General had some catching up to do in the green-car department. Nissan introduced the Altima Hybrid as a 2007 model (and using licensed Toyota hardware), though it disappeared quickly and without leaving much trace.

Toyota and Honda didn't have much to fear from the Vue Green Line's hybrid technology, but it did benefit from regenerative braking and delivered a pretty good 23 city/29 highway miles per gallon (versus 19/25 mpg for the base Vue with 2.2-liter engine and automatic).

The system replaced the starter motor and alternator with a belt-driven motor/generator rig that generated five horsepower and 48 pound-feet. A 2.4-liter Ecotec gas-burner did most of the work with its 170 horsepower.

You could get a manual transmission in the regular Vue, but the Green Line was slushbox-only.

The green paint has faded from this Green Line badge, but it was supposed to be the Gaia-loving counterpart to the planet-ravaging Saturn Ion Red Line. I have mounted Red Line and Green Line badges side-by-side on my garage wall, in order to represent the duality of man.

The storm clouds over General Motors were getting darker by the minute when this car was built, and Saturn would soon have its head on the chopping block. Geo and Oldsmobile were already gone, with Pontiac and Saturn following in 2010.

The entry-level '07 Vue started at $17,995 (about $27,588 in 2024 dollars), while the Green Line version had an MSRP of $22,995 ($35,254 after inflation). Even with $4/gallon gas ($6.13 gallon in today's money), it would have taken quite a while to break even with the Green Line.

The Vue's platform outlived Saturn and still lives today, though. You'll find its derivatives underpinning everything from the Suzuki XL7 to the Wuling Almaz, and it all began with the 2002 Vue.

The interior isn't bad, but a 17-year-old non-AWD car made by a long-defunct brand doesn't command much resale value these days.

There is a way to recapture the world's imagination. To stay the same in one way, and evolve in another. Chapter 11 bankruptcy was approaching quickly, by the way.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

A 2007 Saturn Vue Green Line hybrid in a Colorado wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 20 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 18, 2024

    I'll say one thing about those plastic bodies: they still look good after a decade and a half. Automakers should be sheathing their cars in petroleum-based plastic before they thin out the "sheet metal" to foil thickness.

    • See 1 previous
    • FreedMike FreedMike on Mar 18, 2024

      True, but the flip side was massive body panel gaps. Apparently the plastic would expand when it got hot.


  • Bof65705611 Bof65705611 on Mar 19, 2024

    There’s one of these around the corner from me. It still runs…driven daily, in fact. That fact always surprises me.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 20, 2024

      That was the mistake of GM's bean counters. They figured to save by using GM's "old" drive trains, forgetting that GM's practice is to stop building them after they eliminate all the bugs. The "planned obsolescence" gimmick then went out the window with Saturns. They killed the brand to hide their shame.


  • Tassos Obsolete relic is NOT a used car.It might have attracted some buyers in ITS DAY, 1985, 40 years ago, but NOT today, unless you are a damned fool.
  • Stan Reither Jr. Part throttle efficiency was mentioned earlier in a postThis type of reciprocating engine opens the door to achieve(slightly) variable stroke which would provide variable mechanical compression ratio adjustments for high vacuum (light load) or boost(power) conditions IMO
  • Joe65688619 Keep in mind some of these suppliers are not just supplying parts, but assembled components (easy example is transmissions). But there are far more, and the more they are electronically connected and integrated with rest of the platform the more complex to design, engineer, and manufacture. Most contract manufacturers don't make a lot of money in the design and engineering space because their customers to that. Commodity components can be sourced anywhere, but there are only a handful of contract manufacturers (usually diversified companies that build all kinds of stuff for other brands) can engineer and build the more complex components, especially with electronics. Every single new car I've purchased in the last few years has had some sort of electronic component issue: Infinti (battery drain caused by software bug and poorly grounded wires), Acura (radio hiss, pops, burps, dash and infotainment screens occasionally throw errors and the ignition must be killed to reboot them, voice nav, whether using the car's system or CarPlay can't seem to make up its mind as to which speakers to use and how loud, even using the same app on the same trip - I almost jumped in my seat once), GMC drivetrain EMF causing a whine in the speakers that even when "off" that phased with engine RPM), Nissan (didn't have issues until 120K miles, but occassionally blew fuses for interior components - likely not a manufacturing defect other than a short developed somewhere, but on a high-mileage car that was mechanically sound was too expensive to fix (a lot of trial and error and tracing connections = labor costs). What I suspect will happen is that only the largest commodity suppliers that can really leverage their supply chain will remain, and for the more complex components (think bumper assemblies or the electronics for them supporting all kinds of sensors) will likley consolidate to a handful of manufacturers who may eventually specialize in what they produce. This is part of the reason why seemingly minor crashes cost so much - an auto brand does nst have the parts on hand to replace an integrated sensor , nor the expertice as they never built them, but bought them). And their suppliers, in attempt to cut costs, build them in way that is cheap to manufacture (not necessarily poorly bulit) but difficult to replace without swapping entire assemblies or units).I've love to see an article on repair costs and how those are impacting insurance rates. You almost need gap insurance now because of how quickly cars depreciate yet remain expensive to fix (orders more to originally build, in some cases). No way I would buy a CyberTruck - don't want one, but if I did, this would stop me. And it's not just EVs.
  • Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).
  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
Next