Junkyard Find: 1986 Subaru BRAT GL

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Subaru sold the Leone in the United States from 1972 through 1994, going through three generations in the process. It was available here in sedan, coupe, hatchback, and wagon form… and as a pickup known as the BRAT. Today's Junkyard Find is a second-generation BRAT, found in a self-service yard between Denver and Cheyenne.

Unlike the other versions of the Leone sold in North America, every BRAT had four-wheel-drive as standard equipment. This made it a sales hit in snowy, mountainous Colorado.

As recently as 10 years ago, I found so many discarded BRATs here that I didn't even bother photographing most of them.

Since that time, examples of the BRAT have become very rare here, in the junkyard or on the street.

Some rusted to death, but most just got used up.

This one was in pretty good condition when its career ended. It isn't rusty and the interior is worn but not horribly abused.

Just a bit over 150,000 miles on the odometer at the end. The highest-mile junkyard Subaru I've documented so far was a 1993 Impreza with 319,554 miles.

This is a high-zoot Brat GL with plenty of nice features and options. US-market Subaru Leone-based car models in 1986 were just called "The Subaru" and so their trim levels became de facto model names here.

In order to evade the 25 percent Chicken Tax on imported light trucks, Subaru installed carpeting and jump seats in the beds of 1978-1985 BRATs sold here. This made them cars in the eyes of federal law. It was one of the more clever methods of Chicken Tax avoidance, but lawsuits resulting from injured back-seat passengers in these "cars" ended up costing Subaru plenty.

1986 was the first model year for the jump seat-free BRAT.

As we can see from the underhood emissions sticker, this is a 49-state (non-California) vehicle and it was categorized as a light truck by the federal government.

At first glance, I thought the shaky-looking graphics were a backyard-applied attempt to imitate the optional factory-applied decals.

However, closer examination shows that 37 years of exposure to the elements simply blew out the edges of the lettering. By the way, BRAT stands for Bi-Drive Recreational All-Terrain Transporter. Not quite as good a tortured Japanese-English acronym as Nissan's PLASMA (Powerful and Economic Light Accurate Silent Mighty Advanced) or Sun Creative System's WOOZ (Wild and Original Object with Zoom), but respectable.

It appears that this truck began its career in Bristol, Pennsylvania, just across the Delaware River from New Jersey.

This oil-change sticker shows that it was still in Pennsylvania in 1993. The lack of rust probably indicates a relocation to the west soon after.

The engine is a 1.8-liter boxer four, rated at 73 horsepower and 94 pound-feet when new.

The transmission is the base four-on-the-floor manual. BRATs were never offered here with five-speed manuals, though a three-speed automatic was an option. I've only found one slushbox-equipped BRAT in all my junkyard travels.

This truck has true four-wheel-drive, with a lever the driver had to yank to switch to front-wheel-drive for use on dry pavement. Subaru began selling vehicles here with what we'd now call all-wheel-drive during the late 1980s; every U.S.-market new Subaru came with AWD starting with the 1996 model year.

This truck has the optional T-top roof, pitched as the "Twin-Halo" roof by Subaru.

It also has the no-extra-cost factory four-speaker AM/FM radio, which was necessary for listening to the top hits of the era in proper fashion.

There's air conditioning, which the 1986 Edmund's Foreign Car Prices book claims was standard equipment in the 1986 BRAT GL (I'm skeptical).

From the front, it looks nearly identical to the GL sedan of a couple of years earlier.

The MSRP for this truck before options was $7,783, or about $21,667 in 2023 dollars.

The final model year for the BRAT in the United States was 1987. Sales elsewhere continued through 1994. Subaru tried to revive the old BRAT magic with the Legacy-based Baja for the 2003-2006 model years, but sales weren't great.

"Just tell 'em it saves ya money, bustah!"

This commercial for the early BRAT emphasizes the fun jump seats.

In Australia and New Zealand, it was known as the Brumby.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 30 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Aug 08, 2023

    I always appreciated the Brat and believe that the time might be right to release a similar type of vehicle on the market. Back then there were a number of vehicles that could fall under the 'ute category including the Dodge Rampage/Plymouth Scamp which were Omni/Horizon derivatives.

  • CAMeyer CAMeyer on Aug 08, 2023

    I always liked these, though I don’t know how they got those seats in the bed past the feds. Safety considerations aside, the ride in those plastic outboard seats must have been bone-jarring. And I can’t imagine those handles flanking the seats helped much with comfort or safety.

    An Impreza-based pickup might do well with outdoorsy types who would like a pick up bed for work or fun but don’t want or need a colossal, expensive truck. It would seat only 2, in the cab, of course.

    What’s with that unpleasant troll, anyway.

    • See 1 previous
    • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Aug 13, 2023

      The ride in those seats was not as bad as you would think. The grab handles had a good grip with soft compressible rubber, helping you stay in place. At least that was my recollection from the early 80s...friend's parents bought their daughter one for high school.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next