Top Vehicles for Ungrateful Whelps

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Several schools of thought exist about buying a set of wheels for a teenager or new driver. Some say the youngsters should be forced to drive a knackered hand-me-down, one which builds character and won’t cost a mint when it is inevitably crashed into a tree. 


Others are of the mind that the expected tree-crashing is exactly why parents should stuff their newly licensed children into something new packing all the latest safety features. Then, in the middle ground, we find some families reaching for gently used vehicles with decent crash ratings but ones that won’t break the bank.


Whatever yer stance, Consumer Reports and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have a few suggestions. Now, more than ever, finding an appropriate vehicle that’s actually affordable can be challenging – to put it mildly – given a hyperactive used car market and skyrocketing price tags of even the most horrid machines. This author recently saw a beige 2002 Ford Windstar with 168,000 miles priced at $9,995, fer chrissakes. So, what to do?


“As parents, we can’t control what happens on the road once our teen driver pulls out of the driveway,” says Jennifer Stockburger, director of operations at CR’s Auto Test Center. “But we do have some say in the type of vehicle they drive off in, and that can make a huge difference.” CR and the IIHS have relaxed their $10,000 price cap in recent years, thanks to the overheated market and upward cost pressures, but a goodly number of recommended vehicles still reside in four-figure territory.


Examples? Try the Mazda 3 sedan or hatchback, specifically model years 2014 to 2020, since there should be ample choices under ten grand. Same goes for a Subaru Legacy from the mid-2010s. The little Kia Soul (specifically 2013, 2017, and 2019 models thanks to survey and other scores) gets a nod, as does the stalwart Toyota Corolla from 2013 onwards. Daddy Warbucks, who may be shopping for a brand-new car, is directed towards the likes of a Mazda 3 or Honda HR-V. Check out this link for the full list.


As you’d expect from these types of data-driven organizations, the roster is a bit more than a popularity contest. In addition to other metrics, all rigs on the list have above-average reliability based on CR surveys, dry braking distances of less than 145 feet from 60 mph, top marks in four different crash tests, and stability control as standard equipment.


[Image: Mazda]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on May 31, 2023

    A big part of road safety is defensive driving, patience, and being alert. This means no DUI, drugs, speeding, texting, driving drowsy, weather risks, or being coaxed by your friends to do something stupid.


    Road deaths are climbing despite all the modern tech, and it's because people ignore basic principles of road safety.


    After that, the car is secondary.


    Three of my 5 kids had a car in college - a 2-year-old Sonata (paid for by child #2), a 9-year-old Sonata (paid for by child #3), and a 12-year-old Rabbit (paid for by me for child #5). Respectively, those cars are now 12 (just sold), 16 (still running), and 15 (still running).


    These cars have all been reasonably reliable. When I was in college in the mid-80s (as a commuter the entire time), I drove junk. Over the course of 2 schools and 6 years, I went through 3 cars, 2.5 engine rebuilds, major rust mitigations, and countless repairs which seemed like a weekly thing. I spent about $1000 total for all three back then, so maybe $3000 today. Think of what 3 cars you could get for $3k total today.


    But I had no money, so fixing them was all I could do. Parked outside, just getting them to start in the winter was an accomplishment. Today's cars are so much better.


    By some miracle, none of my kids has had an accident - unlike me - so I have much to be grateful for.

  • Syke Syke on Jun 20, 2023

    First generation Nissan Leaf with some decent mileage left on the battery. Good commuting transportation, definitely uncool enough to keep the teen's ego in check, and definitely not something you can do too much stupid in.

  • Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
  • Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
  • Ash78 Interesting take on the pricing...superficially illogical, but Honda has been able to sell the Pilot Junior (er, Passport) for more than the Pilot for several years now. I guess this is the new norm. I have 2 kids, who often have friends, and I feel like the best option here is buying the CX-90 and removing the third row completely. It won't be pretty, but it adds useful space. We've done that in our minivan several times.I've been anxiously awaiting the 70 for over a year, but the pricing makes it a non-starter for me. I like the 50, but it's tight (small, not dope/fire/legit); I like the 90s, but it's more than we need. This "Goldilocks Solution" feels like it's missing the mark a little. Mazda could have gone with more of a CX-60 (ROW model) and just refreshed it for the US, but I suspect the 90 was selling so well, the more economical choice was just to make it the same basic car. Seems lazy to me.
  • FreedMike If you haven't tried out the CX-90, do so - it's a great driver, particularly with the PHEV powertrain.
  • Ajla I don't understand why it is priced above the CX-90 (about $2500 at every trim level on the I6 and $5k on the PHEV), unless a CX-90 price increase is on the way soon. It will be interesting to see how this does against the CX-90, that one isn't packaged well for a 3-row but with a lower price, very similar exterior styling and identical exterior dimensions I'd lean towards it over the 70. The pricing on higher trims is a bit dear for a nonpremium badge and it is annoying that Mazda and the press pretend that the lower nonS trims don't even exist. Why even bother making them if you won't take it to your own media event?I would expect the engine and chassis configuration to be a killer app here but it seems like engine/transmission is only 80% baked and the interior is what sells these. Reliability is a big question mark as well. In the end outside of a specific buyer (this seems like something Corey would like), I'd recommend getting something cheaper and more established.
Next