Hagerty's 2024 Bull Market List Has a Few Surprises

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Hagerty recently released the seventh installment of its annual Bull Market List, and while this year’s picks are mostly predictable, there are a few interesting surprises. The company’s list highlights cars that it feels are set to grow in value over the next few years, with some exotics and classics and a growing number of “Rad Era” cars every year.


Hagerty’s 2024 list includes:

·     1997-2002 Plymouth Prowler

·     1964-1966 Ford Thunderbird

·     1981-1986 Jeep CJ-8 Scrambler

·     1965-1970 Chevrolet Impala SS

·     2000-2005 Jaguar XKR

·     2011-2016 Ferrari FF

·     1997-1999 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution

·     2008-2013 BMW M3

·     1946-1950 Chrysler Town & Country

·     1989 Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary


A few of those are “duh” entries on the list, but the Prowler is kind of a dark horse. We’ve come full circle with cars like the Plymouth, reaching a point where it’s become cool unironically. The Pajero Evo is a cool choice as this year’s lone JDM entry, but it’s been aggressively climbing in price for a while now.


Hagerty’s list is meant to highlight cars that can be good values with enough research and time on the purchase side. It says it does not mean to celebrate inflated values or make specific models more expensive than they already are. Besides, as Hagerty notes, fun should be the primary goal with car buying, not necessarily making money.


[Image: Dave Goodman via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 24 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 27, 2023

    I'm not surprised seeing the Scrambler added to the list. Jeeps haven't come close to reached Bronco pricing which is nice for shade tree builders.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Dec 28, 2023

    @Art_Vandelay

    I owned a 95 LX with the 4.6 modular from 2007 until late 2019. It was a nice driving and handling car that was quite reliable with normal maintenance. Probably one of the best vehicles I owned, though my previous 87 Thunderbird was quite solid. I sold it and upgraded to a leftover 2018 Dodge Challenger GT awd.

    • See 2 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Dec 30, 2023

      Solid choice IMHO for that role. It was really the last car like it made.



  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
Next