Junkyard Find: 1986 Dodge Aries SE Four-Door Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Lee Iacocca's Chrysler Corporation sold K-Cars in the United States for the 1981 through 1989 model years, saving itself from near-certain bankruptcy in the process. These cars are becoming difficult to find in the Ewe Pullets of the land, and I hadn't written about a true K in the Junkyard Finds series since way back in 2019. Today, we'll look at a K sedan that survived 36 years before being retired in California.

After a decade of fuel shortages and general malaise, Detroit (and Kenosha) knew that American car buyers still loved soft-riding, roomy sedans with comfy bench seats but needed them to be more efficient. For the 1980s, GM created the X-Cars, Ford offered Fox sedans and American Motors had the Concord. Chrysler did perhaps the best job of recreating the occupant experience of, say, a Plymouth Satellite sedan in a vehicle that got twice the fuel economy.

Look at that interior! Cloth-and-vinyl seats that felt like Grandpa's La-Z-Boy, the automatic shift lever on the column where God intended, and an utter lack of pretentious European coldness or punitively sensible Japanese practicality. It was (sometimes) hard to believe that this was a four-cylinder compact with front-wheel-drive.

Though the extended Chrysler K Family had many members (including minivans and Maseratis) and stayed in production deep into the 1990s, there were just five true K models sold in the United States: the Plymouth Reliant, Dodge Aries, Dodge 400, Dodge 600 and Chrysler LeBaron (though not all the LeBarons and 600s were genuine Ks).

The Aries and Reliant sedans were the real sales heroes of the K family during the 1980s. Like the Dodge/Plymouth Colt or Omnirizon of the same era, the two generally had identical sticker prices and were distinguishable from each other only if you looked closely at grilles and emblems.

1986 was the first model year in which every Aries and Reliant got electronic fuel injection. The 2.6-liter Mitsubishi Astron aka "Hemi 2.6" engine (optional in the Aries and Reliant through 1985) was gone, replaced by a 2.5-liter Chrysler. This car has the base 2.2, rated at 97 horsepower and 122 pound-feet.

The 100-horse/138-pound-foot 2.5 cost an extra $279, or $782 in 2023 dollars.

The emissions sticker tells us that this car was originally sold in California, and that its first owner paid $99 extra ($277 now) for the equipment that made it meet the Golden State's smog requirements.

The SE was the top Aries trim level for 1986, and the MSRP for this car started at $7,759 (about $21,737 after inflation).

This car almost certainly cost a lot more than that. The three-speed automatic transmission listed at $504 ($1,412 in today's money), for example.

The air conditioning was $757 ($2,121 today), but at least the AM/FM stereo radio was standard equipment in the Aries LE and SE.

We can assume it would still be on the road today, had it not been hit in the right rear. It doesn't take much to total a car with a triple-digit resale value.

My personal K-Car experience hasn't been as positive. A decade ago, I endured enjoyed the misfortune character-building experience of a Denver-to-San Francisco journey with the K-It-FWD 1987 Plymouth Reliant 24 Hours of Lemons race car (feel free to send nastygrams to Car and Driver about whatever terrible glitch jankified the formatting in those articles, by the way).

Hey, that cash back just about covers the A/C and automatic!

The dance moves of the Dodge Boys in this commercial seem more appropriate for the 600 coupe, or maybe even the Lancer Turbo.

Naturally, you can't discuss the Aries without sharing one of the earliest viral videos of the Internet Era. I recall angrily futzing with video codecs in order to watch the file I'd laboriously downloaded of this spoof Aries commercial, circa 2000.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

1986 Dodge Aries in California wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • Abraham Abraham on Jan 18, 2024

    When cars had one simple mission: get me where I’m going. Now they have AI powered touch screens, remotely monitored and lojacked, weight 6000 lbs, have 22 air bags, 104 CPU’s and 800HP. To do exactly the same thing.

  • John Clyne John Clyne on Jan 21, 2024

    I thought there were three levels of Aries available? America? The SE & the LE?

    these were all over the roads when I started driving. However I couldn’t afford new at the time because my employer didn’t pay a living wage? I was looking for a second hand version but they were either dog eared from heavy use or were smoker’s cars. Neither of which I wasn’t willing to own? A neighbor had one & it was well worn with lots of dents & bumper stickers. Later another daughter turned it into an ashtray on wheels. It was used up by the time they sold it.

    • Theflyersfan Theflyersfan on Jan 22, 2024

      I remember the America edition was the last gasp models before the Spirit and Acclaim were released. I recall they were sold at a cut-rate price with some standard features that used to be options, which makes sense because I'm sure the tooling was long since paid for and they were making decent money on each one.


  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next