Biomass to sugars and lignin company announces new name, new CEO, $30M in funding and a $75M deal with Mississippi to build plants in state
New Volkswagen Polo BlueGT with cylinder deactivation offers gasoline engine fuel economy of up to 52 mpg US

Ram Truck to offer factory-built CNG pickup

Chrysler’s Ram Truck will offer a factory-built compressed natural gas-powered (CNG) pickup truck—the only manufacturer in North America to do so. The Ram 2500 Heavy Duty CNG pickup is powered by the 5.7-liter HEMI V-8 and features both compressed gas storage tanks and an 8-gallon gasoline fuel tank. The truck is designed for fleet and commercial customers.

The Ram’s 5.7-liter HEMI bi-fuel engine has been modified to run on compressed natural gas as well as gasoline. Redesigned cylinder heads with specifically designed CNG compatible valves and valve-seat materials allow the engine to burn both fuels. It also gets a second, CNG-specific fuel rail and set of injectors. New spark plugs improve combustion and durability, and a new powertrain control module allows the HEMI to seamlessly operate on either of the two fuel sources.

The Ram 2500 CNG system was fully engineered and tested by Chrysler Group and assembled at the company’s Heavy Duty truck plant in Saltillo, Mexico.

In use, the system is automatic; eliminating operator switches altogether and utilizes either CNG or gasoline, transitioning from one to the other with little discernible difference in operation or capability.

Although a small amount of gasoline is used during engine startup, the Ram CNG runs exclusively on compressed natural gas. If the CNG tanks are emptied, the vehicle will automatically switch to gasoline.

In addition to a conventional gasoline fuel gauge, a second CNG-specific gauge sits adjacent to it in the instrument cluster.

CNG-only range is estimated to be 255 miles, while the backup supply of gasoline extends the range to 367 total miles.

The Ram 2500 Heavy Duty CNG’s two 4.6 cu.-ft. (130-liter) CNG tanks are located in the forward portion of the Ram’s 8-foot pickup bed. Both tanks are mounted to the frame and covered by a painted 50 ksi high-strength steel cover. The CNG filler connection is located next to the gasoline fuel neck, accessed through the Ram’s fuel filler door. The CNG tanks provide a gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) of 18.2 gallons.

Ram 2500 CNG offers 1,580 lbs. of payload, 4-ft.-8-in. usable bed length and 7,650 lbs. of towing capability. The Ram 2500 is delivered ready-to-tow and standard equipment includes the integrated 4- and 7-pin connectors along with a Class IV hitch receiver. The Ram CNG also comes with a trailer brake controller with customer-programmable electric or electric-over-hydraulic trailer brake options.

A 5-year/100,000-mile powertrain limited warranty covers the HEMI V-8 and transmission, and adds internal engine components specific to CNG: the upgraded valves, the valve seats, fuel injectors and rail and the specially designed spark plugs—all part of the factory installed manufacturing and production processes.

Covering virtually every other aspect of the Ram 2500 CNG is a 3-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper limited warranty. Specific to the CNG engineering, this covers all non-engine components, including the tanks, storage compartment and fuel filler equipment.

Chrysler parent Fiat is the dominant CNG manufacturer in Europe with a greater than 80% share of the market. Fiat sales of compressed natural gas vehicles in Europe have exceeded 480,000 passenger cars and light duty vehicles (1997-2011).

Moreover, since 1995, Iveco (Fiat Industrial’s truck and commercial vehicles division) has focused heavily on natural gas propulsion, and is now European leader in research and sale of natural gas vehicles, with 11,000 units now in use by private companies and public authorities.

Italy has more widely adopted CNG vehicles than the US and offers 800 public CNG stations.

Comments

Account Deleted

If you follow the link to Chrysler’s page you get a picture showing that those gas tanks occupy almost half of the trunk space. Until the can make it without compromising trunk space it is no good for much and wont sell well either. They need to design future chassis with a bay at the floor of the car that can accommodate those gas tanks or batteries in a plug-in version. For a moment I sought I might be happily surprised. Unfortunately, Chrysler need more time to do this CNG pickup right.

ejj

This is awesome - I love Ram trucks. These will no doubt become standard throughout oil & gas fields and other places....as long as NG stays cheap.

sd

Well if they had made the claim to be the only one to offer a CNG pickup last Friday, it might have been true but by today, Both GM and Ford also have a CNG offering. I would like to see more on the Ford but it probably also uses bed space. The GM truck uses bed space but appears to be less than the Ram.

SJC

They could offer 100 mile CNG range and use half the bed space. As long as you have 300 mile range with gasoline, there should be no problem.

Davemart

'Pricing starts at $47,500, including $995 destination charge.'

What kind of premium is that on the conventional model?
Those of us who are not native can find it complex to compare prices and specs.

ejj

Davemart: If you look at the MSRP for these new trucks that are for sale, it looks like a $10k - $15k premium... http://tinyurl.com/87qwjzk

Davemart

ejj:
That's absurd.
No gains are possible on fuel costs out to AD2100 then.
Premiums in Europe are far lower.

A D

Chris m from autobloggreen said that it's bad to offer 2 tanks into a car or truck because it take too much valuable space. Im glad that manufacturers don't listen to him.

Engineer-Poet

Back of the envelope calculation:

The total CNG capacity is 9.2 ft³.  Assume tubular steel tanks of 6" OD and ¼" walls.  The ID is 5½", for a cross-section of 0.165 ft².  A volume of 9.2 ft³ would require a bit under 56 linear feet of tubing (not including end caps), or about 7 lengths beneath an 8-foot truck bed.

The tubing would be heavier and stronger than the truck's frame rails, which could be replaced by the tubing.  This would eliminate intrusions into the cargo space and yield a stronger frame.

william g irwin

@EP: But that would make it a much different truck and kill the mass production advantage and crank up the price even more.
I agree that there has to be a better, protected location for standard off the shelf tanks, but the price premium has to be limited.

ejj

From a crash perspective, it doesn't get a whole lot better than the current location they've all chosen does it?

Engineer-Poet

WGI, a lot of that depends on how much else can be shared.  If mounting points for the bed and rear suspension don't change the only structural difference becomes the frame itself, and that only rearward of the cab.  A few details like brake-line routing would change, but that's minor.

The tradeoff is for a huge gain in utility, as the bed of the CNG model would no longer have the loss in capacity compared to the standard.

HarveyD

A CNG truck runs about 25% cleaner than the gasoline equivalent.

Being able to go the first 100 miles or so on CNG could reduce the use of imported crude derived fuel by 70% to 80%. Based of 15,000 miles per year at 15 mpg, each truck could reduce imported fuel by about 800 gallons/year. Multiplied by 20 + million it could reach about 16+ billion gallons a year.

A worthwhile endeavor.

E-P's suggestion has potential for all trucks.

The comments to this entry are closed.