Fluidic nanochannels could play important role in future fuel cells and batteries
Daimler and GAZ partner on Sprinter production in Russia

BYD to announce US launch plans for EVs and PHEVs at NAIAS

BYD Co., Ltd (BYD) will reveal plans for the launch of US-ready electric drive vehicles and clean energy products at the upcoming 2011 North America International Auto Show (NAIAS) in Detroit. BYD will present its “Three Green Dreams” strategy, which focuses on renewable energy generation (solar power); environmentally friendly energy storage (Li-ion iron phosphate batteries); and energy consumption (plug-in vehicles).

BYD says it will showcase its “Green City Solutions” at the show: electric drive vehicles, solar panels, home energy storage units and energy-saving LED Lighting. This is BYD’s fourth consecutive appearance at NAIAS.

BYD’s battery-electric e6 Premier (MY2012) and a new dual mode electric SUV S6DM will make their world premieres on the main floor exhibit space at the COBO Center at the 2011 NAIAS. The first mass-produced F3DM sedan low-carbon version and the core drive technology of a battery-electric bus, shown at EVS25 recently, will also be showcased.

The new 5-seat BEV crossover features a more dynamic and sporty exterior design. Equipped with a BYD Iron-phosphate FE battery pack, the e6 Premier has an expected range of 300 km (186.4 miles) on urban roads, while its projected top speed is 140 km/h (87 mph). It takes 40 minutes to fully charge the e6 on a 100 kW fast charging cabinet and 6 hours to overnight-charge the e6 on a 10 kW standard charging pole.

These characteristics make the e6 ideal for daily commuters and in-town driving, BYD suggests.

The battery-electric 12-meter K9 e-Bus features in-wheel electric drive and the electronically-controlled air suspension, allowing this e-Bus to have ample space and a low-floor for easy passenger loading and unloading. The K9 is able to run 250+ km (155+ miles) on a single charge.

The BYD S6DM SUV is an independent 4WD dual-mode electric SUV. Traveling more than 60 km (38 miles) in all-electric mode and more than 310 miles extended range when engaging the 2.0L gasoline engine, this SUV sports a 10 kW electric motor (M1) paired with a 6-speed dual-clutch transmission propelling the front wheels while a 75 kW electric motor (M2) powers the rear wheels.

The F3DM low-carbon version also features the BYD iron phosphate pack together with a BYD 371QA 1.0-liter gasoline engine. This vehicle is equipped standard with a solar panel sunroof to parallel charge the battery. Powered by the battery pack alone, the F3DM can travel more than 60 km (38+ miles). The extended range HEV mode allows the car to achieve another 500 km (or 313 miles) with a maximum speed of 150 km/h (about 93.2 mph).

Comments

HarveyD

BYD may very well become a major GREEN diversified manufacturer.

Their electrified vehicles will certainly be very competitive.

joewilder

How will our car companies ever compete with a country whose people only earn the equivalent of $3.75 per hour?

kelly

"How will our car companies ever compete with a country whose people only earn the equivalent of $3.75 per hour?"

By corp officers paying each other millions a year while shifting plants overseas.

This year, I paid $700 a month for US medical insurance. If I worked for minimum wage, I would have cleared $800/month. $100/168hr a month = 60 cents per hour.

The US worker is really a bargain.

SJC

No one ever answered the issue of low wage countries from the 1970s on onwards. Nixon went to China and business people wanted to sell products to 1 billion Chinese. I guess no one figured out that when you trade with China the table turns.

When a house thee costs much less than here, the worker can have a decent standard of living on lower wages. A house in 1960 in the U.S. was $20,000, forty years later the same house costs $300,000. Adjusted for the cost of living, the same house should sell for under $100,000.

HarveyD

Lets not forget that USA was built with very low wage immigrant workers. For decades, nobody could compete with made in USA products.

SJC is getting close. Not only some union workers were/are overpaid but all the legal embezzlement by lobbies and friends, banks, insurances, traders, speculators, exaggerated legal and health care cost, management exorbitant pay, etc etc doubled the cost of goods produced in USA. That's also how banks and speculators raised the price of the average large home from $30,000 to $800,000+ before the bubble burst in 2007.

USA, with unregulated greed and corruption has priced itself out of the market. Over 15 million Americans are out of work. To many are going deeper in debt and can't no longer afford the high living standards that they got used to. Those oversize houses and cars are a burden that many cannot pay for.

Short term solutions, like printing more $$$, paying more unemployment benefits and health cares and Flower Parties reduced taxes will make matter much worse two or three years down the road. Giving people more $$$ to buy made in China goods is not the solution. That's what happened in Greece, Ireland, Island (and other countries soon). Germany tried to maintain the economy going with artificial ways and printing more money in the 1930's and it failed.

One possible solution is a major national infrastructures + electrification program to put 10 millions people back to work, Simultaneously, apply much tighter regulations to stop multiple embezzlements from draining/sinking the economy. Short term higher tariffs on all or selected imported goods, starting with $2+/gal on crude oil, could also be used without triggering an international trade war.

SJC

One way to improve the situation is not to allow corporations to write off expenses for sending jobs out of the country. In effect those write offs are subsidizing jobs going to low wage countries. They can do that but it will cost them and the American tax payers are no longer going to help pick up the tab.

HarveyD

This will only be done when interested lobbies support it. It is definitely NOT in their interest to do so. Since they effectively run the government, specially during pre-election times when politicians need funds, it could stay on the wish list for decades.

What the current Fed Government can do is very limited. The next Government may not do any more or even less. USA is in a structural bind. We will go from one bubble to another until all resources are in the hands of very few. Just like the Monopoly game.

SJC

I tend to agree, but public money for public office would tip the balance more in favor of the people. The courts can say corporations are people, but we all know that is absurd.

Engineer-Poet

If the Tea Party can eliminate the corporate-owned candidates in the Republican primaries, maybe a Populist Revel can eliminate the same in the Democratic primaries. That would fix the Boss Tweed problem; it might be possible for one corporate candidate to win as an independent or write-in (e.g. Murkowski), but once it's obvious that that's what they all are, their votes would dry up.

HarveyD

Great hopes that may never materialize.

Reel$$

BYD's biggest problem is trying to operate in a totalitarian, minority rule nation with a despicable Human Rights record. Why would Americans buy inferior technology from Human Rights abusers??


http://www.autotropolis.com/auto-news/chinese-automaker-byd-in-trouble.html

Peace Hugger

@ Reel$$,

The US also has its own issues like racial discrimination, massacres, bigotry, prejudice, international bullying, Gitmo, etc. but those have not stop the world from buying American.

HarveyD

Reel$$...FACTS...BYD and many other firms make $$B under those hard conditions and we are buying the majority of what they produce. Like Japan, Korea etc China will quickly learn to make good vehicles at a very competitive price. They may lead the market with electrified vehicles by 2020.

Peace Hugger....Not so sure that the world is not reacting to our questionable behavior. Our trade deficit is growing fast.

SJC

Our deficit went from $100 billion during Clinton to over $700 billion per year under Bush. Most of that increase was due to the rise in the price of oil. Oil guys are usually more happy when the price of oil is higher.

ai_vin

If the Tea Party can eliminate the corporate-owned candidates in the Republican primaries,

That wont happen as long as the Tea Party is supported by the corporations; http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/08/24/4962235-koch-industries-funds-tea-party-really
http://thetyee.ca/News/2010/11/01/TeaPartyTies/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18677
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/opinion/29rich.html

ai_vin

Our deficit went from $100 billion during Clinton to over $700 billion per year under Bush. Most of that increase was due to the rise in the price of oil.

Ten years of Bush taxcuts to the rich didn't help either... Whoops! make that 12 years, now that Obama's caved in to the Republicans.

SJC

I was referring to the trade deficit from the previous post. Bush claimed the deficits were below $300 billion each year when they were actually $600 billion. Do the math, if you run $300 billion deficits each year for 8 years you end up with $2.4 trillion in debt. They ended up with $6 trillion in debt.

Reel$$

Reframers: talk of deficits does not eliminate the issue: BYD is a failing Chinese battery maker working under a government so hostile as to have confiscated seven of BYD's properties. The world recognizes China's abominable Human Rights track record, as does the Nobel Peace Prize Committee:

"Geir Lundestad, the secretary of the Nobel committee, said there would be an empty chair and a portrait of Mr. Liu on the podium as the rest of the glittery ceremony proceeded with speeches and musical interludes — some, at Mr. Liu’s request, performed by children’s choirs."

Not to mention Chinese business culture of stealing intellectual property and not paying for it:

http://tinyurl.com/2cgv8zx

Until China adheres to its international agreements (eg United Nations Declaration of Human Rights) it will find itself isolated in the small community of totalitarian states. China's businesses and products will suffer the consequence.

HarveyD

Reel$$. That's one personal point of view from your (our) side of the fence. We all have the inherited habit to see what others do wrong but rarely see what wrongs we are doing. We are very far from being perfect and are a long way from the ideal example. Our costly disastrous oil wars and our man made technology-financial-real estates bubbles are something we don't want to talk about. We're making the whole world suffer. You have to go back to the last years of the Roman Empire to see worse. We have lost our angel wings decades ago.

ai_vin

@Reel & Harvey

I agree with both of you but be aware there is no way America can protest China's human rights abuses too loudly because of your national debt and how much of it China owns;
http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/11/treasury-securities-national-debt-china-trade-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Debt_Trend.svg

ToppaTom

Of course the USA is far from perfect but I get a bit tired of such sentiments as the following, from the coddled:

" We are very far from being perfect and are a long way from the ideal example. You have to go back to the last years of the Roman Empire to see worse."

Really? Or go to most any other country than the US.

If all the others are so much better, and we are so malicious and evil, you should tell all the immigrants.

And since nationalism (at least in excess ) and blind loyalty to country is divisive, you should stand up for what you believe in, and while you are up, vote with your feet.

HarveyD

TT: With current long lasting high unemployment, exploding corruption and crime rates plus disastrous financial bubbles and oil wars, only people from countries (Mexico, Irak, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Philippines, Africa, South America, etc) where conditions are even worse, will decide to immigrate. For most others, it is no long the garden of heaven that it used to be.

One of the best political system has been highly corrupted. Elected positions are indirectly and effectively sold to the highest bidders. Electors are highly brain washed and vote for the biggest hand outs or loudest campaigns. Anybody with $2+B could have his own puppy (puppets) elected to the highest positions. Everybody is up for sale. Many would vote for somebody who promises to lower taxes even if it means closing schools, police stations, hospitals, fire stations and most public services. Let people with $$$ rule and live it up and others pay taxes and pick up the crumbs, if any.

A just society is not like that. A democracy, ruled by The People for The People is not like that.

After 225+ years, time has come for an up-date or even a major overhaul of the Constitution, Laws, Institutions and Regulations and Limitations before it crumbles and crashes further and brings the world economies down with it.

Reel$$

Harvey, your myopic view of the nation and the world is self-fulfilling, but only in your view. In other sectors and communities, there is prosperity and abundance. We have now the greatest opportunity to balance growth and energy use with preservation of natural environment and terrestrial elements. It begins not with pessimism and whining despair - but with the application of belief and action to correct the things that are wrong.

That means looking internally AND externally. If you think the western economies are any MORE corrupt than than those in Mexico, Irak, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Philippines, Africa, South America, etc. - you're in deep denial. And it means accepting, perhaps for the first time, the criticism of those you deem "lesser than." Get used to it. There's more where that comes from.

jjaaddee

Our environmental and economic problems are largely about fuels.

If the US, Japan, China, etc., didn't need to import immense fuel supplies, then these fuel importers wouldn't need to export so furiously.

Americans still don't get that they need to export "furiously" to pay for fuel imports. Instead, Americans are also importing finished goods "furiously". Every time I hear "optimistic" reports about rebounding American retail sales (credited to economic "stimulus" or another snake-oil boondoggle), I know that's actually bad trade-deficit news for the US. And I haven't even commented yet on the enormous threats and costs due to massive petrodollars in the wrong hands (think Soviet Union historically, and Islamism today).

Here's a suggestion about how to fix this: Every qualified expert I've read about has panned the EESTOR super-ultra-capacitors as physically impossible vaporware. But there are other very promising capacitor technologies that seem to have been buried due to technical, patent, or mischievous obstacles. For example, lithium-ion capacitors to regenerate a car's braking energy from one high-speed stop might weigh 15 kg (while currently marketed ultracapacitors could weigh 75 kg). The braking energy recovered using such a capacitor may be close to 90%, while braking energy recovered using batteries would be much lower (and much more costly due to battery wear-and-tear). Lithium-ion capacitors were announced several years ago, and I've seen almost nothing about them in 2010. Graphene capacitors announced this year may be even better, but I expect them to "disappear" by next year as well. Let's get some pressure going to breathe life back into these buried capacitor developments !!!

HarveyD

JJ: In a free wheeling economy, patents that could reduce energy consumption and/or reduce the cost of energy can be bought and buried for decades.

Fortunately, China and a few other countries may take a different view and use those patents to produce lower cost more efficient products for their population. We may not like it but it is good for humanity.

Patents rights have often been used to block mass production and marketing of excellent products because it would hurt somebodies current business and profit margin.

The comments to this entry are closed.