Survey: 75% of Americans Say New Energy Sources More Critical Than Fuel Efficient Cars
Japan Automakers Plan to Step Up Exports of Small-Cars

Concept: Downsized and Supercharged Hybrid Pneumatic Engine for 30%+ Reduction in Fuel Consumption

Ethhpe1
Schematic of downsized and supercharged four-stroke hybrid pneumatic spark injection engine. Source: ETH Zürich. Click to enlarge.

Researchers at ETH Zürich, with partners Robert Bosch GmbH, Wenko Swissauto and the Swiss Federal Office of Energy are developing a downsized and supercharged hybrid pneumatic engine that they say can deliver a fuel consumption reduction of more than 30% compared to a standard engine with the same rated power. (Earlier post.)

The reduction in fuel consumption is obtained mainly through enabling the effective use of a heavily downsized engine, rather than from regenerative efficiency. The injection of the additional air during transients can overcome the poor driveability usually associated with heavily downsized and supercharged engines, the team notes.

In the pneumatic hybridization scheme, each cylinder is connected via a fully variable charge valve to a shared pressure tank. When braking, and with fuel cut-off, the engine can intake air and pump it into the pressure tank. Without the injection of fuel, the pressurized air can be used again for starting or driving. Shifting the operating point of the engine is also possible, using at least one cylinder in a conventional combustion manner at high load, and using at least one cylinder to pump air into the pressure tank.

Before realizing the design of a hybrid pneumatic engine (HPE) in hardware, the researchers evaluated the different pneumatic engine modes (motor mode and pump mode) associated with both two-stroke and four-stroke implementations of the pneumatic concept.

The HPE was long thought to be a system in which all engine valves had to be actuated in a fully variable manner to allow for two-stoke pneumatic modes and still enable the four-stroke combustion mode. However, this setup adds complexity and cost. [In sticking to] four-stroke cycles for both combustion and pneumatic operations...the intake and exhaust valves remain camshaft-driven and only the charge valve, which connects the cylinders to the pressure tank, is fully variable.

—Dönitz et al. (2009)

Although the HPE approach can in concept be applied to both spark ignition (SI) and compression ignition engines (CI), after an evaluation of engine types, the team decided that downsized SI engines offered the best target for an HPE application. CI engines (diesels) require costly exhaust gas treatment to deal with the high raw emissions—neither being problems that can be tackled with HPE.

In large naturally-aspirated SI engine, high-friction, pumping losses and part-load operation all contribute to poor fuel efficiency. In this case, they decided, fuel savings due to HPE might not be sufficient to meet emerging CO2 targets. On the other hand, downsized SI engines are low-cost, and exhibit significantly improved efficiency. Their main disadvantage is poor driveability, which can be tackled with the HPE concept.

Ethhpe2
Test bench setup. Source: ETH Zürich. Click to enlarge.

The hardware concept.

The ETH Zürich team modified a two-cylinder, 0.75L multi-purpose engine to realize their HPE concept in hardware. The original engine was designed by Wenko Swissauto, and manufactured by Weber Automotive. The engine has a compression ratio of 9.0, and is port fuel injected.

For valve actuation, ETH Zürich used what it called a fixed camshaft configuration: the intake and exhaust valves remain camshaft-driven, and only the charge valve connecting the cylinders to the pressure tank is fully variable. The concept engine uses the Bosch electro-hydraulic valve system (EHVS).

The engine has two intake and two exhaust valves per cylinder. The team replaced one exhaust valve per cylinder with a charge valve. This compromise, they said, was the least restrictive solution for conventional combustion operation. Because the original engine connected the two exhaust channels to form a common exhaust port, the team welded channel separations into each exhaust channel. The EHVS actuators for the two charge valves are located on the outer part of the cylinder head.

Ethhpe3
Measurement: switching between all modes. Source: ETH Zürich. Click to enlarge.

The team was able to test all conventional and pneumatic engine modes on the concept engine. The most difficult task, the researchers noted, is the step from conventional combustion mode to the supercharged mode (injecting the air mass via the charge valve).

The concept demonstrates a low pneumatic regenerative efficiency (caused by the engine’s friction and heat losses, hence the pneumatic hybridization itself does not contribute much to the overall fuel savings.

Regenerative efficiency measurements and drive cycle simulations show that the idea of the pneumatic hybridization alone might not be effective enough. However, this new technology can provide the breakthrough for strong downsizing and supercharging of gasoline engines.

Compared to a naturally aspirated engine with the same rated power, the downsized and supercharged hybrid pneumatic engine can save as much as 32% fuel, as simulations show for the fixed-camshaft configuration. The major part of this gain is due to downsizing the engine.

The problem of “turbo-lag” usually associated with heavily downsized and supercharged engines is completely overcome by injecting additional air from a pressure tank and more fuel during transients. Experiments have verified the engine’s instantaneous torque response resulting from applying this “supercharged” mode.

—Dönitz et al. (2009)

The next step in the work is the implementation of a turbocharger, and the validation of fuel consumption of the HPE for complete drive cycles on the test bench. The final goal of the project is the integration of an HPE into a passenger car to demonstrate driving performance and fuel consumption.

Resources

Comments

ToppaTom

Sounds mostly like some good work to advance the state of the art.
"The concept demonstrates a low pneumatic regenerative efficiency .. the pneumatic hybridization itself does not contribute much to the overall fuel savings.

"This new technology can provide the breakthrough for strong downsizing and supercharging of gasoline engines.

The major part of this gain is due to downsizing the engine.

.. “turbo-lag .. is completely overcome .."

SJC

Instead of compression release, they have compression storage. Why didn't they just say that instead of dancing around it.

ai_vin

This makes for the fifth variation of the 'downsized engine saves gas' theme I've seem on this site.
The others are; aggressive supercharging (combining electrosupercharging with turbo also overcomes the lag they mentioned), gasoline direct injection, ultralean burn with hydrogen boost, and high compression with direct ethanol injection for antiknock.

All deliver a fuel consumption reduction of about 30% compared to a standard engine with the same rated power.

ToppaTom

Do you mean they all CLAIM to deliver a fuel consumption reduction of about 30% compared to a standard engine with the same rated power?

Many makers have used turbos in moderately downsized engines in all types of vehicles and Volvo has been doing this for years but I have not tried to compare their mileage with equivalent non-turbo autos.

Lucas

Here's a downsized fuel saving engine for you:

A two cyclinder, opposed, air cooled, turbocharged diesel, two-cycle. driving a generator, with electronic motor control powering a 92% efficent external rotor electric motor.

We don't even have to wait for it. It already exists.

HarveyD

For decades we were told that much bigger engines where far safer and better. A few years ago our glorious Big 3 where ready to go to V-10 and V12, 6 to 8 L monster engines to give us exactly what we they knew we wanted????

This has nothing to do with brain washing. We need much larger more powerful vehicles because we are Americans.

Were we misled? Were we naive? Were we both? May be!!! Have we changed? May be not enough.

Many rightfully think that we have been had for decades.

Mark_BC

Here's a downsized fuel saving engine for you:

A two cyclinder, opposed, air cooled, turbocharged diesel, two-cycle. driving a generator, with electronic motor control powering a 92% efficent external rotor electric motor.

We don't even have to wait for it. It already exists.


It just makes too much sense. To which vehicle are you referring?

HarveyD

Lucas & Mark:

Do you have a link to that engine?

Lucas

Google William Lucas Jones Hybrid.

ToppaTom

When you start with a false premise like "For decades we were told that much bigger engines where far safer ...".
Who ever told you a big V-8 was safer?
Did you believe them ???

A few years ago the Big 3 DID offer V-10 and V12, monster engines, but they were available only to those who wanted them – they made you pay for them.

Were we misled? Were we naive?
Maybe you were – I was not.

Many liked big cars that drove like boats.
Gas was cheap.

Many rightfully think that we had it easy for decades.

The new buzzword for social paranoia is agenticity – it is the instinctive believe ones world is controlled by remote agents. Natural selection favored paternicity and agenticity in animals.

It was safer to believe in patterns and enemies, when there was no threat than to dismiss the signs and be killed. Today we should be centuries beyond such superstitions and paranoia.

Roger Pham

Turbocharging and downsizing automatically give 30% gain in fuel economy?

Not so fast! Turbocharged SI engines require lowering of compression ratio (CR) and enriching the mixture during turbo boost, hence will have adverse affect on fuel consumption. Ford Eco-boost concept went around this problem by alcohol injection during the boost phase in order to prevent lowering of CR. Honda plans to use VCR (Variable Compression Ratio) mechanism to lower the CR during the boost phase and maintain a high CR during partial load to gain fuel efficiency.

Good luck in the next phase of implementation of a turbocharger without either a VCR or water-alcohol injection.

The simplest form and most reliable form of engine-downsizing is to put up with a little slower acceleration. Ain't gonna hurt nobody being a little slow! (in acceleration only)
Otherwise, "electric boost" in the form of a HEV is an already proven and commercially viable practice.

Nick Lyons

Roger--

Production Ford Eco Boost does not use alcohol injection--it combines turbo boost with direct injection of gasoline only, along with variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust sides. They claim ~10 - 20% economy improvement for same functionality as larger, naturally-aspirated engine.

Ford is also involved in development of alcohol direct injection, but that is further down the road. This is supposed to give ~30% fuel economy improvement.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/04/ford-e85di-gasolinepfi-20090426.html

Roger Pham

Thanks, Nick, for the correction.
Yes, conceivably, it is possible to raise effective CR a little bit by early closure of exhaust valve at part load, hence retaining a little more heat and pressure. Also, delayed closure of intake valve at high load can reduce effective CR, but, this would reduce volume of intake charge that can be partially made up for by pressure boost. So, the 10-20% gain is plausible. However, VCR would still be best.

The comments to this entry are closed.