Volvo Trucks constructing electrified charging corridor in California for medium- and heavy-duty EVs
GM and Pilot Company to build out coast-to-coast EV fast charging network powered by EVgo eXtend

Volkswagen commissions fast-charging park with 570 kWh of second-life MEB cell modules

At the Zwickau vehicle plant, Volkswagen commissioned the first fast-charging park in Saxony supplied with energy largely from a power storage container (PSC). The PSC is an electricity storage unit and consists of 96 cell modules with a net capacity of 570 kWh.

The advantage is that fast-charging infrastructure can be built nearly anywhere, even if in places with a low-capacity grid connection. Residential areas are one example of where this could be used. All cell modules in the PSC were formerly installed as batteries in pre-production models of the ID.3 and ID.4 and have now been given a second purpose.

wo other central German companies—AW Automotive and Automotive Research—were involved in the realization of the project.

Reusing batteries is important for the future and it’s closely linked to the acceleration in the trend toward electric mobility. With the power storage container, Volkswagen Sachsen is demonstrating a practical, cost-effective and useful case to enable cell modules at the end of their service lives to have a second life. This automotive power bank could be used wherever the capacity of the grid connection is too low but there is demand for powerful charging infrastructure. Innovative ideas like this could provide renewed impetus for the critical buildup of fast-charging infrastructure.

—Karen Kutzner, managing director for finance and controlling at Volkswagen Sachsen

As a large battery storage unit, the PSC offers a cost-effective alternative to a transformer station. It enables large quantities of energy to be provided in a short time without overburdening the electricity grid. Another advantage is that the temporary storage of energy allows for high basic costs that would otherwise be incurred during standby operation, even when no vehicles are charging, to be avoided. The automotive power bank could therefore enable HPC infrastructure to be built in the future where previously only AC charging at a maximum of 11 kW has been possible, for instance in residential areas.

For fast-charging parks with high-power chargers (HPCs), transformer stations are normally installed with a connection to a powerful medium-voltage grid that operate 24 hours a day and require a significant initial investment. This is accompanied by an average charging time of only a few hours per day.

The charging park at the west gate of the Zwickau plant is made up of four charging stations, each with an output of 150 kW, which can also be divided into two outputs of 75 kW. This means that up to eight vehicles can charge at the same time. The electricity comes from the adjacent photovoltaic installation, among other sources. Because Volkswagen Sachsen has been purchasing green electricity since 2017, all vehicles are therefore charged with 100% renewable energy. Three fast-charging parks will be in operation on the plant grounds by the end of the year.

For the PSC, Volkswagen Sachsen is relying on a solution that Audi already successfully used as part of the Audi charging hub in the urban area in Nuremberg. The container cubes consist of used lithium-ion batteries from disassembled Audi test vehicles that are used as buffer storage for direct-current (DC) electricity.

Comments

mahonj

It is a good idea, but lets not get overexcited here.
570 kWh is about enough to charge 10 cars from 10-80%.
Then you have to refill it.
If you have an 11 kWh line, this will take > 52 hours, or > 2 days.
Thus, you can, or average, charge 5 cars a day with this and an 11 Kw input.
Change that to a 50 kW line and you are in business, but lets stay focused on reality.
Q: where is the best place to site battery storage -
in cars,
in houses,
in grid storage locations?

Engineer-Poet

A home wouldn't likely be charging more than two vehicles at a time, so 11 kW service would be fine.  The house I grew up in had 240 V/300 A service, capable of 72 kW (though we never used anything close to that).

What irks me about this article, though, is this (emphasis added):

The electricity comes from the adjacent photovoltaic installation, among other sources. Because Volkswagen Sachsen has been purchasing green electricity since 2017, all vehicles are therefore charged with 100% renewable energy.

This is greenwashing BS of the highest order.  "Among other sources" means the grid, which in Germany is switching from Russian gas to domestic lignite.  This talk about "green electricity" is meaningless unless electricity is ONLY consumed when the "green" generators are generating.  For German PV, this means an average of about 11% of nameplate and much worse than that in winter.

It's long past time to call out this BS when and where ever it appears.

Gryf

Actually, the VW Zwickau does appear to be using 100% renewable energy using sun, wind and hydro sources. A Solar PPA from Enerparc AG, the Kaprun hydroelectric power station in Austria, Wind Power from Volkswagen Kraftwerk .
https://www.volkswagen-planet-better.com/en/guided-tours/guided-tour-03.html#
https://electrek.co/2019/07/22/vw-zwickau-factory-electric-cars/
https://www.kloepfel-magazin.com/en/industry-news/supply-chain/volkswagen-uses-green-power-for-e-car-production-6593/

Engineer-Poet
Actually, the VW Zwickau does appear to be using 100% renewable energy using sun, wind and hydro sources.
No they're not.
A Solar PPA

is a fraudulent device to claim "green" credit for what is not actually green.  It greenwashes grid power by adding "green" power to it somewhere, sometime while relying on always-on fossil, nuclear and sometimes hydro to actually run things.  The grid is not a battery and it's wrong to treat it as one, either in law or in practice.

The comments to this entry are closed.