FCA using Dow “green foam” for NVH
GM expands connected and autonomous vehicle engineering & software development work in Canada; new Markham Software Center

Ricardo: achieving light-duty diesel RDE NOx compliance in urban driving is possible, at a price

A range of aftertreatment technology options are available to automakers seeking to achieve compliance with the impending EU Real Driving Emissions (RDE) regulations, according to the results of a Ricardo research project presented recently at the SIA Powertrain international conference and exhibition in Rouen, France. The SIA conference was focused on clean compression-ignition engines of the future.

Future RDE emissions legislation and fleet average CO2 targets represent a challenge for automakers wishing to provide cost-effective light duty diesel vehicles. But while the costs of implementation can be significant, a range of technologies is available which, applied in a combination and manner appropriate to needs of the vehicle, can deliver compliant performance in terms of both NOx and CO2.

Ricardo has previously reported on a simulation environment set up to enable the study of engine and after-treatment technology over RDE cycles, incorporating post-processing with the EMROAD and CLEAR tools.

In the SIA paper, Ricardo reported on the use of this simulation environment to further explore the challenge and capability of LNT (lean NOx trap)-based solutions. Solutions were also tested on an engine dyno, providing steady-state test results to help understand the mechanisms involved, and provide input data for the simulation.

The vehicles on which the research was based were representative of current production models at the more aggressive end of the downsizing spectrum in terms of engine capacity and output, but modeled with a future three cylinder 1.5 liter diesel engine.

The drive cycles to which they were subjected exceeded the finally adopted RDE boundary conditions in the motorway phase, but nonetheless provide a useful indication of performance.

The research shows that RDE legislation represents a significant challenge for light duty diesel manufacturers, and will require large steps in the application of existing technologies. While known technologies were shown to be capable of appropriate NOx control, they come with downsides to other product attributes, notably cost, reductant fill frequency where applicable, and ultimately, fuel consumption.

Fig for PR_530
Attribute analysis presented in SIA paper. The cost comparison is with respect to a Euro 5 baseline. Click to enlarge.

It is expected that application of exhaust thermal management to improve urban phase NOx control will see the combination of low pressure cooled EGR together with an oxidation catalyst and actively dosed combined SCR/DPF (SCRF) as an acceptable solution for both C-segment and SUV products.

For premium applications where inter-service reductant fill would be unacceptable—or where two-stage boosting adds to the complexity of exhaust temperature control—the combination of LNT and actively dosed SCR is likely to be attractive.

The introduction of RDE regulations in Europe represents a very significant challenge, particularly for those automakers offering light duty diesel products. However … this is a challenge that can be met in a cost-effective manner through the application of a combination of aftertreatment technologies appropriate to each vehicle type. We are pleased to be sharing the results of this work at the SIA Powertrain international powertrain conference—results that demonstrate that the requirements of RDE regulations can be met in future, light duty clean diesel products.

—Ian Penny, managing director – engines business, Ricardo

At the SIA conference, Ricardo also exhibiting a the ADEPT concept vehicle, combining low-cost 48V, mild-hybrid technologies with the aim of reducing 1.5L Diesel C-segment CO2 emissions by a further 15-20 percent, and showing a clear pathway to 70g/km. The ADEPT project is led by Ricardo in partnership with CPT, Ford, EALABC, Faurecia, the University of Nottingham, RedDeer, and Provector, and is supported by Innovate UK.

Also on display was the Doosan DL06 Tier 4 final engine, which uses the Ricardo patented Twin Vortex Combustion System and achieves US Tier 4 final – Stage IV emissions with EGR and SCR, but no requirement for a DPF.

Comments

Lad

Hybrid is the way to go here, not diesel; It makes no sense to develop torque and then suppress it with a complete secondary system of smog/nox devices. The hybrid offers Gobs of immediate low end torque, great acceleration from the electric motor and smooth long range cruising from the secondary ICE. Until batteries can replace fossil fuel, the hybrid is the best compromise. Diesels are obsolete and costly to operate.

James McLaughlin

Lad, you might be right but for the wrong reason. SCR/DPF does not impede performance and actually improves fuel economy in the heavy duty market. The issue is scaling it down to light duty applications.

GasperG

How does 35% more engine and AT cost translate into €€€? I still don't get how that 48V mild hybrid will be low cost?

Toyota full hybrids are already in the price range of diesels, calling 48V system, diesel, double clutch, aSCRF(LPcEGR) "low cost" is just silly.

CheeseEater88

Diesel in LD Trucks and larger are about the only places in the future that make the most sense...unless somehow turbines become economical. (they'll burn anything)

I'm not sure how selective catalyst reduction / diesel particulate filters improve economy... but maybe over the other technology that preceded them which was EGR, and Massive EGR.

Higher fuel pressures do a lot on emission controls, running multiple injections, and improved monitoring helps the most.

I'd consider a diesel in a truck, but if there was a rough equivalent in Gas, or Gas/Hybrid Electric, I'd opt for the Gasoline version.

Emissions Equipment on Diesels will make them unaffordable to all but the diehards and the ones that need them most. So, large working vehicles. Everywhere else its just a niche.(or will be soon, depending on what side of the pond).

An Electrified LD Truck/SUV is where battery technology should be very profitable. 50mile (Empty) EV range, downsized engine (Cant downsize too much, because of towing), but the gains in electric over ICE in efficiencies would be very evident. Especially if it had enough battery reserve to Regen brake from 60mph+ with a maxed trailer to as stop and recover all that energy.

I don't think LD trucks can make it to full BEVs within the next 10 years, but if you could put 60kwh packs and make a long range hybrid, it could pay off.

2L Turbo~ 200hp to 2.7T ~300hp, 60kwh pack(could be used for onsight gen)(payload would suffer, but it shouldn't affect towing too much)... biggest benefit would be accelerating to a stop and energy recovery from a stop.


Downsides would be towing uphills where engine+ Battery might not be enough to maintain speeds with a heavy load. It could be enough capacity to make it through a steep grade that long.

The comments to this entry are closed.