Concord Energy and cellulosic biogasoline company Cool Plant to establish JV in Asia-Pacific region
Study shows paper-folding concepts can compact a Li-ion battery and increase its areal energy density

Duke study finds China’s synthetic natural gas plants will have heavy environmental toll; 2x vehicle GHG if used for fuel

Coal-powered synthetic natural gas (SNG) plants being planned in China would produce seven times more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional natural gas plants, and use up to 100 times the water as shale gas production, according to a new study by Duke University researchers published in the journal Nature Climate Change.

As part of the largest investment in coal-fueled synthetic natural gas plants ever, the central Chinese government recently approved construction of nine large-scale plants capable of producing more than 37 billion cubic meters of synthetic natural gas annually. Private companies are planning to build more than 30 other plants, capable of producing as much as 200 million cubic meters of natural gas each year—far exceeding China’s current natural gas demand.

These plants are coming online at a rapid pace. If all nine plants planned by the Chinese government were built, they would emit 21 billion tons of carbon dioxide over a typical 40-year lifetime, seven times the greenhouse gas that would be emitted by traditional natural gas plants. If all 40 of the facilities are built, their carbon dioxide emissions would be an astonishing 110 billion tons. [They] will lock in high greenhouse gas emissions, water use and mercury pollution for decades.

—Robert B. Jackson

The analysis by Chi-Jen Yang, a research scientist at Duke’s Center on Global Change (lead author) and Robert B. Jackson, Nicholas Professor of Environmental Sciences and director of the Duke Center on Global Change finds that:

  • If the gas produced by the new plants is used to generate electricity, the total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions would be 36% to 82% higher than pulverized coal-fired power.

  • If the synthetic natural gas made by the plants were used to fuel vehicles, the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions would be twice as large as from gasoline-fueled vehicles.

The study notes that the plants would also emit hydrogen sulfide and mercury, which, if not properly scrubbed and treated, are potentially harmful to human health.

These environmental costs have been largely neglected in the drive to meet the nation’s growing energy needs, the researchers say, and might lock China on an irreversible and unsustainable path for decades to come.

Excessive water consumption by the plants is also a concern, the researchers noted. Producing synthetic natural gas requires 50 to 100 times the amount of water you need to produce shale gas, Yang said. The nine plants approved by the government—most of which are located in desert or semi-desert regions in Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia—will consume more than 200 million tons of water annually and could worsen water shortages in areas that already are under significant water stress, he added.

At a minimum, Chinese policymakers should delay implementing their synthetic natural gas plan to avoid a potentially costly and environmentally damaging outcome. An even better decision would be to cancel the program entirely.

The increased carbon dioxide emissions from the nine government-approved plants alone will more than cancel out all of the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from China’s recent investments in wind and solar electricity. While we applaud China’s rapid development in clean energy, we must be cautious about this simultaneous high-carbon leapfrogging.

—Chi-Jen Yang

Resources

  • Chi-Jen Yang, Robert B. Jackson (2013) “China’s Synthetic Natural Gas Revolution,” Nature Climate Change doi: 10.1038/nclimate1988

Comments

HarveyD

Finally, we have found ways to double GHG created by every vehicle, by using liquid fuel made from NG/SG and/or bio-gas?

Will we ever learn?

Kit P

Who is ‘we’? This is Harvey’s beloved slave labor China.

Coal gas (aka city gas, town gas) was an environmental nightmare leaving behind a legacy of superfund sites in the US. While the engineering is very interesting, modern methods of providing energy have been place in the US and EU for more than 70 years.

Jon

I cannot see this article is about liquid fuels, but using SNG directly as vehicle fuel. SNG is methane made from coal. Town gas is a mixture of methane, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, there is quite a difference from SNG in gas quality. Not that this in any way seems to improve the environmental issues in China.

Kit P

@Jon

You are correct about town gas. The liquid fuel would be methanol.

I checked the linked journal paper. Turns out that I had read it before. Another GCC post linked it without reading it. It appears to be case of poor central planning and a complete disregard for the environment in China. The paper is interesting and worth reading.

Henry Gibson

Seven times the green house gas release of conventional natural gas producing plants is a gross misrepresentation, since natural gas is only processed not produced by factories. Ethane, propane and butane are the main gaseous substances that come from the wells other than methane and these are removed for their high value. The methane is the "waste" product and is not used but destroyed if there is no natural gas "grid" nearby to put it in. Methane produced from coal may well require more CO2 release but so does driving on the Autobahn or US highways at 80+ mph instead of 55.

If the US had built coal to automotive fuel factories when the price of oil was driven high solely by speculators and not lack of supply, they would be available now to convert a flood of natural gas methane to automotive or jet fuels.

A diversified coal to methane factory is in North Dakota and is selling half of its produced CO2 to Canada and is in a good position to sell the other half to the many new oil wells in North Dakota to continue high production rates from the failing wells when pipelines are built.

Small Stirling refrigerators have been available for 50 years from a company in the Netherlands that can liquify natural gas as well as ethane, propane and butane so that natural gas need not be flared. Capstone turbines is selling hundreds of micro turbines into the oil fields that run on unprocessed well gas, and can power the Stirling refrigerators, but then they can switch to the pure methane, the waste gas, and save the other gases in pressure tanks. The remaining methane can be cooled and turned to a liquid which is shipped in a cryogenic LNG tanker that may also use a natural gas Stirling refrigerator to keep the product cool, but an ancient Linde process may work also. This can be powered directly by an engine that runs on LNG vapour. ..HG..

HarveyD

We = 7 billions going on 8 billions.

The comments to this entry are closed.