New UC Davis market-based sustainability forecasting approach concludes supplanting gasoline and diesel with renewable fuels could take 131 years
A123 Systems to develop battery pack for new EV from SAIC

Wrightspeed secures $5M in funding for series hybrid drive system for high-performance vehicles and medium- to heavy-duty trucks; gas turbine as extender

Wrightspeed, Inc., the developer of the high-performance electric X1, has secured $5 million in a Series A financing from a private investor. The funding will be used to support the development of Wrightspeed’s Digital DriveSystem—an extended-range hybrid electric drive system targeted at high fuel consumption (e.g., medium and heavy-duty trucks) as well as high-performance vehicles. Both applications are similar in needing high power motors, Wrightspeed notes. Unlike conventional internal combustion engines, the same electric motors can be used in both high-power/continuous use (trucks) as well as high power/transient use (sportscars).

The DDS platform includes: the battery system, electric motors and drive electronics, generator control system, vehicle dynamics control, user interface and the software control plane. The system uses motors modularly, enabling tailoring to a vehicle’s specific use.

The motors are light—approximately 40 lbs (18 kg)—and high power, delivering up to 250 hp (186 kW). A DDS system can be configured with one, two or four motors. The light weight makes packaging them in high performance cars or in truck axles (replacing the differential) easier than with existing motors.

The battery system delivers and absorbs sufficient power that the generator engine load is completely de-coupled from the road load. This allows always running the generator at its most efficient operating point. In a highly variable drive cycle, this alone can show a two times gain in fuel efficiency, Wrightspeed says. The battery system delivers peak power, while the generator engine delivers average power.

For the high fuel consumption applications, the peak power is 10 or more times higher than the average power, which means the engine can be very much smaller than the engine it replaces in the conventional powertrain. In some niche applications, the generator may be omitted, making the drivesystem a pure battery EV, the company says.

The battery system is smaller and less expensive than in a pure battery EV, but much larger than in a mild hybrid. As a result, the payback time can be much shorter than in pure battery EV: the system is cheaper, yet it allows displacement of more fuel per day, because it does not have the range limitation; and more regenerative braking energy can be recaptured than in the mild hybrid case, or with hydraulic hybrids.

The cell chemistry is chosen for power density and maximum delivered energy over the life of the cell. Pure battery EVs need high energy density cells, which can’t deliver the power, nor do they last as long.)

The generator system uses a gas turbine, and has no cooling system, no lubrication system, no exhaust after-treatment to meet emission standards, and is about one-tenth the weight of a conventional piston-engine generator with similar durability, Wrightspeed says. The turbine is also omnivorous, burning almost any available fuel with only minor fuel system changes, including landfill gas at up to 7% sulfides.

The vehicle dynamics control system takes advantage of the fast, precise control over individual wheel torque and speed to deliver advances in safety at extreme levels of performance, or under poor traction conditions, or with unusual loading conditions in trucks. A further benefit is the recapture of more regenerative braking energy than conventional systems allow. Competing systems which use one motor driving a conventional differential cannot achieve any of this, Wrightspeed says.

Joining the board of directors is David Welch, Ph.D., co-founder, Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of Infinera. Wrightspeed’s announcement comes on the heels of the announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the first ever programs to improve fuel efficiency for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. (Earlier post.)

Comments

Engineer-Poet
The motors are light—approximately 40 lbs (18 kg)—and high power, delivering up to 250 hp (186 kW).
That is just stunning, and answers the critics of electric drivetrains.

If the motors could be downsized to 1/4 the power and weight, they would make excellent in-wheel motors. They could replace rear disc brakes.

clett

I thought Wrightspeed used repackaged AC propulsion systems, based on commodity 18650 LiIon cells.

This announcement suggests they have moved on to a new battery supplier and chemistry - perhaps LiFePO4 or titanate?

kelly

"The generator system uses a gas turbine, and has no cooling system, no lubrication system, no exhaust after-treatment to meet emission standards, and is about one-tenth the weight of a conventional piston-engine generator with similar durability, Wrightspeed says. The turbine is also omnivorous, burning almost any available fuel with only minor fuel system changes, including landfill gas at up to 7% sulfides."

Maybe the Jaguar C-X75 sports car that stole the Paris car show wasn't so far fetched..

HarveyD

Interesting approach. In-wheel e-motor will be an option. PHEVs with a very light weight multi-fuel genset is an option for the next 20 years or so or until such time as batteries performance have improved by 300+% and their price have dropped to 33% or less. That could be somewhere between 2020 and 2025.

Meanwhile, we will see improvements in e-motors, control systems, energy recovery system, e-accessories and on-board ultra light gensets.

ToppaTom

Take one of these Digital DriveSystems and reduce the electric motor size from 250 hp to one 100hp motor, to cut cost and weight.
Reduce the battery pack likewise for further cost and weight reductions.
Use an existing COTS ICE of moderate durability to drastically reduce costs even further and halve its fuel consumption (and run the ICE at its most efficient operating point to halve its fuel consumption again, so it will not require a large fuel tank or be range limited).
Match the sizes of the ICE, electric motor, battery size and the regenerative braking level to obtain the most efficient minimal system for low initial cost and operation.

You have the IDEAL family ERBEV.

NO, WAIT, you have a Volt !

Those suckers cost $40k, or $33k after Uncle Sam pays you to buy one.
Sigh.

Engineer-Poet

The Volt price was originally given around $34,000; it ran up to its current level as Washington added subsidies, showing that GM knows how to grab money from the table.

Also, the Volt's motors come to 111 kW, or about 149 HP. That's more than enough. It only takes 95 HP to haul a car and cargo trailer loaded to over 3 tons up a 5% grade at 65 MPH.

Account Deleted

You have questions http://www.myelectromobile.com/content/elektromobil-protiv-ferrari-i-porshe

The comments to this entry are closed.