DOE authorizes additional volume at proposed Freeport LNG facility for export
New 4-cylinder 2.3L EcoBoost on Lincoln MKC small SUV; future EcoBoost prospects

Self-healing polymer wrapper enables longer cycle life in silicon anodes for Li-ion batteries

Cui
Top: The stress of repeated swelling and shrinking shatters a conventional silicon electrode and its polymer binding. Bottom: An electrode coated with stretchy, self-healing polymer remains intact. (C. Wang et al., Nature Chemistry) Click to enlarge.

Two Stanford/SLAC labs—one studying next-generation lithium-ion batteries and the other working on synthetic human skin—have combined their expertise and created an advanced silicon anode that can heal its own cracks after extended cycles of charging and discharging. They report the advance in the 19 Nov. issue of Nature Chemistry.

The key is a stretchy polymer that coats the electrode, binds it together and spontaneously heals tiny cracks that develop during battery operation, said the team from Stanford University and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Silicon electrodes coated with the self-healing polymer lasted 10 times longer than those without the new polymer, healing any cracks within just a few hours, said Stanford Professor Zhenan Bao, whose group has been working on flexible electronic skin for use in robots, sensors, prosthetic limbs and other applications.

Bao and his group worked with Dr. Yi Cui and his colleagues on the new silicon anode. The result could accelerate the commercialization of higher energy density Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles, cell phones and other devices.

Silicon is targeted as one of the more promising anode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries due to its relatively low working potential, abundance in nature, and theoretical gravimetric (specific) capacity of 3,579 mAh g−1 for Li15Si4 at room temperature)—almost ten times that of commercialized graphite anodes.

However, as has been often reported, silicon experiences a significant change in volume (more than 300%) during the lithiation and delithiation processes, resulting in pulverization and loss of electrical contact, as well as formation and propagation of an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on its surface—both of which result in rapid capacity fading of the battery. (Earlier post.)

This is a problem for all electrodes in high-capacity batteries, said Hui Wu, a former Stanford postdoc who is now a faculty member at Tsinghua University in Beijing, the other principal author of the paper.

Researchers worldwide are devising approaches to counter this structural problems; researchers in Cui’s lab have tested a number of ways to keep silicon electrodes intact and improve their performance (e.g., earlier post). Some are being explored for commercial uses, but many involve exotic materials and fabrication techniques that are challenging to scale up for production.

Self-healing is very important for the survival and long lifetimes of animals and plants. We want to incorporate this feature into lithium-ion batteries so they will have a long lifetime as well.

—Chao Wang, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford and one of two principal authors of the paper

Wang developed the self-healing polymer in the lab of Professor Bao; for the battery project he added tiny nanoparticles of carbon to the polymer so it would conduct electricity.

Healing-cracks
Left: An electron micrograph shows cracks left in a self-healing polymer coating due to swelling of its silicon electrode during charging. Right: Five hours later, the smaller cracks have healed. (C. Wang et al., Nature Chemistry) Click to enlarge.

To make the self-healing coating, the scientists deliberately weakened some of the chemical bonds within polymers. The resulting material breaks easily, but the broken ends are chemically drawn to each other and quickly link up again, mimicking the process that allows biological molecules such as DNA to assemble, rearrange and break down.

The polymer-coated electrodes worked for about 100 charge-discharge cycles without significantly losing their energy storage capacity.

Their capacity for storing energy is in the practical range now, but we would certainly like to push that. That’s still quite a way from the goal of about 500 cycles for cell phones and 3,000 cycles for an electric vehicle, but the promise is there, and from all our data it looks like it’s working.

—Yi Cui

The self-healing electrode, which is made from silicon microparticles that are widely used in the semiconductor and solar cell industry, is the first solution that seems to offer a practical road forward, Cui said. The researchers said they think this approach could work for other electrode materials as well, and they will continue to refine the technique to improve the silicon electrode’s performance and longevity.

The research team also included Zheng Chen and Matthew T. McDowell of Stanford. Cui and Bao are members of the Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, a joint SLAC/Stanford institute. The research was funded by DOE through SLAC’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development program and by the Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford University.

Resources

Comments

HarveyD

Interesting application of a new technology.

If this holds true for extended period, it could become a fundamental change in EV battery technology in the not too distance future?

NewtonPulsifer

I doubt it.

Yes they got to 100, but I don't see them making 3000. Probably not even to 500 cycles, but the improved energy density might still make it viable for portable electronics batteries.

Silicon-carbon lithium sulfur seems to be more promising for electrified transport.

http://www.gizmag.com/researchers-increase-lifespan-lis-batteries/26911/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=fb77fc8c0c-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email

2950 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C for a silicon-carbon anode - yes only 82.4% as good, but vastly more feasible IMO.

http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130408/srep01622/full/srep01622.html

Treehugger

HarveyD,

you should understand now that this kind of concept cannot be for a not too distant future, new concept take decades to become commercial product, but 99% of concept just don't end up being a product and stay just a concept.

HarveyD

Self healing polymer coatings are more then a concept and are becoming a reality with many future possible applications.

Using those coatings to improve batteries with silicone anodes is new and will certainly need years of trials and fine tuning to find the ideal way to do it.

Secondly, this is only one of 101 ways to do it. The future may be full of surprises.

We are in the early years of effective e-storage units. Today's EV batteries will look very primitive by 2030 or so.

Mannstein

HarveyD,

You mean to say silicon not silicone. The former is a semiconducting element the latter a type of high temperature rubber.

HarveyD

I stand corrected.

Silex, silicia, siliciu or silicon are more appropriate alternative names for Element No. 14 present in 28% of Earth's crust.

Of course, silicones are soft rubber like dérivatives from pure silicon.

HarveyD

Correction: siliciu should read silicium.

Arne

NewtonPulsifier,

"Yes they got to 100, but I don't see them making 3000"

And you base that on what assumption or knowledge?

Observe the figure in the provided link to the abstract of the article. It is blurry, but you can just make out enough to see that these cells actually INCREASED in capacity during the first 100 cycles. The basis for the statement "The polymer-coated electrodes worked for about 100 charge-discharge cycles without significantly losing their energy storage capacity." therefore eludes me. Also compare the performance of these cells to other technologies. The difference is remarkable, not to say: stunning.

Normally, they test cells in the lab for a limited number of cycles and then extrapolate those results to get an idea of real-world performance. Extrapolation is in this case very difficult because the technology is so vastly different from what we now have. That's my take on why the researchers didn't venture a guess on how many cycles these cells would last under the common benchmark of 80% capacity remaining.

Probably we only know what these cells can do if the researchers decide to do a test of thousands of cycles. At a (dis)charge rate of 0.5C a 1000 cycle test already takes half a year.

The comments to this entry are closed.