Axion International signs LOI to form global JV with Sicut Holding to target $8B railroad tie market with recycled structural composites
Researchers engineer E. coli for direct production of isobutyric acid

Increased sales of larger vehicles in June lowered average new car fuel economy from May; increase in fuel economy year-on-year

Truempg1
Average small car TrueMPG June 2010 v. June 2011. Data: TrueMPG. Click to enlarge.

TrueCar.com provided actual fuel economy numbers from June US light vehicle auto sales that indicate “TrueMPG” will increase to 21.6 mpg US in June 2011 compared to 21.3 mpg in June 2010, but decreased from May 2011 at 21.9 mpg.

TrueMPG computes monthly average fuel economy by brand, manufacturer, origin and vehicle segments by using actual sales data or forecasted sales data for the current month. Calculations start at the trim level, taking into account EPA fuel economy data including engine size and drivetrain that affect a vehicle’s fuel economy ratings; the sales share from each trim level is then calculated to create an average for each model.

Brand level data is calculated by the sales share of each model and the manufacturer data is then based on the share of each brand, providing an accurate and completely data driven picture of actual measured fuel economy in the market place. TrueCar utilizes EPA’s average fuel economy rating using 45% highway and 55% city driving behavior.

According to TrueCar.com, the TrueMPG for vehicles sold by US manufacturers averaged 21.6 mpg in June 2011, up from 21.3 mpg in June 2010. European manufacturers increased their average fuel economy for vehicles sold from 21.0 mpg to 21.5 mpg; Japanese manufacturers decreased their average fuel economy from last year at 23.2 mpg to 22.9 mpg; and South Korean manufacturers decreased their average fuel economy for vehicles from 25.2 mpg to 25.1 mpg.

In a snapshot of a few vehicle segments, TrueMPG found that for June 2011, Toyota was the TrueMPG leader in the small car segment, with an average 30.9 mpg US (a decrease of 2.2% from June 2010). Ford and Hyundai were tied for the TrueMPG leader in the mid-size car segment with 26.3 mpg (a 1.1% and -0.1 percent change from June 2010, respectively). GM was the leader in the large truck segment, with an average 17 mpg US, up 0.3% from June 2010.

Truempg2
  Truempg3
Average midsize car TrueMPG June 2010 and June 2011. Data: TrueMPG. Click to enlarge.   Average large truck TrueMPG June 2010 and June 2011. Data: TrueMPG. Click to enlarge.

Car buyers are no longer seeking smaller vehicles as they had in the previous few months as gas prices have recently declined. That said, consumers looking for larger vehicles, such as large pickups, are choosing the more fuel-efficient six-cylinder versions that offer the same utility but better fuel economy.

—Jesse Toprak, Vice President of Industry Trends and Insights at TrueCar.com

Comments

Treehugger

So why Americans keep complaining about the gas price ? that they are broke and can no longer afford it, it is not reflected in the car figures sales...

ejj

Rental car companies are always upgrading their fleets, and Obama has gone on a spending spree - upgrading the federal fleet to more efficient models...so that has no doubt made a dent in the figures.

HarveyD

Acquired bad ways are stronger than high gas prices?

ToppaTom

Most or all Americans do not like high gas prices.

But that would be also true if gas went from $1.50 to $1.75.

Most/many Americans do not like like sub-compacts or minis ?

We want people to refuse to pay over $2.50 or $3.50/G and so buy minis and hybrids -
- they do not think like we want them to.

Do not be too sure who is illogical.

HarveyD

TT: For decades we were told that we would all get to be richer and richer, we believed that we would all become a millionaire and even a billionaire. Of course, with very cheap gas we also believed that we would all have three or four 3+ tons gas guzzlers per family and live in $1++M homes. Expanding, limitless credits would make it happen. The American Dream would go on and on.

Reality checks happened in the 1920s and in the early 2100s. We all know what happened when it busted in 1929 and again in 2006/2007. Following the 1929 bust, we had a 10+ year recession which ended with WW2. The latest bust is very far from being over. Even by going $14+T in debt, the Fed has not managed to fix it. Jobless are more and more numerous. With 150,000 new potential workers every month, creating only 18,000 jobs/month is not going to fix the current unusually high unemployment rate.

Many well informed people are convinced that we will not manage to pull out of the current crisis unless we manage to redesign the current financial structure and introduce appropriate checks and balance. Wealth has to be better distributed. The Monopoly Game cannot keep on. Directors, Managers, speculators, many professionals, etc cannot rake it 2000 times more than the average worker without paying much taxes. That will have to be fixed.

HarveyD

Correction....early 2100s should read early 2000s.

Reel$$

You guys need to grok the official acknowledgment of LANR-CF excess heat generators by the Chief Scientist at NASA, and MIT, Stanford, George Mason etc. Yes the same NASA that's behind climate change now admits we have working over-unity technology. It is very green, non-radiative and currently produces about 10X input power.

TT is correct. "- they do not think like we want them to." And they will not be controlled by our monopoly on energy any longer. Arghhh!

ALL the old rules are on the chopping block. Centralized energy, oil, gas, old school utilities - will go the way of AGW - out of business. Unless they start to tow the line and invest in new energy systems.

As for debt, etc... depends on who you believe:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brlo4qqkDZ8

Talk about "reality?" - make people laugh.

Treehugger

Right Harvey

This country is sick of worse and worse wealth redistribution and of the finance surfing on it, but people seems to be happy with it since they vote for the GOP whose only goal is to protect the interest of the riches. It is incredible that Obama find almost no support in is fight to get the riches take more of the burden of the debt. This country in 2020 will be like Brazil in the 70s with 50% of the wealth in the hand of 1% people, and 30% having no access to healthcare or education, god bless america...

ToppaTom

Harvey & TH.

“Expanding, limitless credits would make it happen ["we would all get richer and richer, .. become a millionaire and even a billionaire...have three or four 3+ tons gas guzzlers per family and live in $1++M homes].”

No, it caused the housing bubble.

It put people in houses they could not even afford to rent.

And yes; “Even by going $14+T in debt, the Fed has not managed to fix it [jobless rate/recession]“

There is much wrong with the current financial structure and there must be continuous efforts to adjust/improve appropriate checks and balances, but the fault lies with the politicians like those who hand out exemptions to their own Obamanation of a health care plan, to those who support their party.

You would entrust such people with the power to confiscate from the achievers?

I believe the increasing power of special interests, big business and unions is that we do not demand the highest level of integrity of our leaders, they have taken the job to lead the country, but they “emulate” businesses by selling what they have; us.

Businesses are supposed to make a profit by selling what they have.
To do so they must make what buyers want.

From this situation as you paint it, how does it follow that “. Wealth has to be better distributed.”

If you want to rake in 2000 times more than the average worker, become a skilled director, manager, speculator, professional; don’t just confiscate it from those who are.

If a player in the minor leagues understands that he can make as much money as one in the majors, not by taking the money from him, but by consistently batting over .400, why can’t you?

ejj

I saw study recently that a majority of Americans, in every state except Colorado, can be considered obese. So are Americans buying bigger vehicles to haul around Americans are bigger than ever before?

ejj

Are Americans buying bigger vehicles to haul around Americans THAT are bigger (fatter) than ever before?

wintermane2000

No its not that americans are fatter tho that does force a limit of how small the drivers seat can be;/ The simple fact is somthing is acting as a counterforce be it safety driving conditions.. shopping patterns whatever something is limiting the minimum size of cars in the us and its powerful enough to be worth hundreds even thousands of dollars a year... so whatever it is its not a petty thing its an 800 lb gorrila in the room.

Treehugger

Toppa Tom

BS, there is no economy that can succeed if the wealth redistribution doesn't work, Americans workers work more hours than in any developed country, they need 2 jobs to make a leaving, still the middle class is loosing ground when the riches, thanks to the accumulated tax cuts of Reagan and Bush and also the growing size of the capital gain, are just stock piling the wealth when the country is sinking in its debt. Never before the selfishness and the cynicism of the wealthy but also the corruption of the political class had reached such levels. Why should we spend money in education and health of the masses ? just start a war (or 2) to keep them busy when they are unemployed so that they don't complain, or let them just die, that's what america is all about.

SJC

It has been shown that when there is a greater gap between the wealthy and others there is more economic hardship in general. The wealthy and corporations can afford to pay more, but they pay less. Corporations pay a smaller percentage of the national budget then in the past, the deficits and debt reflect that.

HarveyD

TT...you identified some of the imbalances but you seem to want more? America will continue to be in a crisis situation as long as those unjustified imbalances have not been properly addressed. Otherwise, a 1929 style major longer lasting crash is in the wind. The perceived energy crisis is a mini part of it.

ejj...good points but the majority is not there yet.

TH.... wish that many more would start to see it. The majority still believe in Santa Claus.

SJC...your assessment is correct but you are ahead of the majority.

Treehugger

Harvey

Right, that's is where the Cynicism of the GOP reaches summits, just promise that cutting taxes will give every body the opportunity to become Steve Jobs or Warren Buffet one day and that's it

ExDemo

harvey d,

Why is that the Obamunists have increased the government's fleet of limousines by 73% in only 2 and 1/2 years? Do as I say, but not as I do?

The useless incompetent crackpots in this Administration singlehandedly decreased the US auto fleet economy with their 3 massive purchases of 3 mpg limousines.

ToppaTom

We do NOT need redistribution of wealth.

We need politicians that are not corrupt, that are not for sale.

If that cannot be done the last thing we need is to have these same crooks control our money.

Cuba tried redistribution of wealth and it didn't work.

Also, Obama disagrees with you; he vehemently denies he is for redistribution of wealth.

Do you believe him?

Reel$$

The perceived energy crisis is a mini part of it.

Er, have you guys not gotten the memo? The energy crisis resolves around excess (green) energy - not limited energy.

NASA's Chief Scientist Dennis Bushnell acknowledged the number one energy development is LANR-CF physics, typified by Andrea Rossi's E-Cat and Randy Mills' black light catalyst.

Game over.

Treehugger

TT

Of course we need redistribution (or rather a distribution in the 1st place) of wealth, but you misunderstand the concept, redistribute wealth doesn't necessary means Tax en redistribute, but simply reduce the gap between high and low wages for examples. Your example of Cuba is a joke, today economy of northern europe where 50% of the GDP is taxed and redistributed are doing very well, Sweeden, Norway, Denmark, Germany are strong re distributor type of economies and do better than US. It is easy to understand that a better distribution of wealth stimulate the economy, all economists agree on this, all

SJC

It is well known that if people that are not rich have income they spend most of it, that is a flow. Rich people will put the rest into hedge funds which have increased 10 fold in the last 10 years.

Treehugger

SJC

yes it is as simple as that, Brazil discovered that simple fact and started to reverse the process of concentration of the wealth in few hands that keep this big resource rich country iddle for decades.Lula a socialist minded politics did a fantastic job, breaking that infernal spiral, now Brazil is thriving. Concentration of wealth in a minority is the end of the economy, and that is exactly what happening right now in US. 1% of the population capitalize 25% of wealth and this wealth is just wasted in the process

wintermane2000

Treehugger the reason the wealthy are getting richer is they are investing in china and india and various other places. You have 3 million americans investing say 10 million each in various projects around the world... and getting 13-15 million back if they are lucky. In 10 years most of those 3 million will have lost.. on average about 2.25 million of them will have lost enough they fall out of the top bracket many falling very far. But they are all replaced with even more new rich people who then roll the dice and again most fall the next decade.

The problem right now is they are rolling the dice in china and india and everywhere.. but mostly not here. Because the odds are crappy here so few wana play the game here.

The gop wants to try and get them to play more here but they just arnt likely to come and play in the numbers we need.

We simply need a better way of getting them to play here while harnessing that power to run this country our current method is driving alot of them elsewhere and robbing us of trillions in the process.

HarveyD

W-2000...you can't blame investors to go to China (and India). By 2025, Chinese will buy 50,000,000 vehicles a year and Americans about 10,000,000. Even India could make and sell more vehicles than USA. The same could happen to many other products including airplanes, wind turbines, solar cells, e-trains and what have you.

We are into a long lasting failed cycle and we do not know how to pull out of it. Changing the politicians may make it a lot worse. Printing more $$$ is not the answer. Borrowing more $$$T will sink us even further down. The American dream is becoming a nightmare. We are becoming has been?

SJC

In 2000 there were 1000 hedge funds, now there are 10,000. There is an estimated $10 trillion under management and the funds are seeking maximum return with minimal risk. That does not create job growth in the U.S. 2001-2008 saw only 10% of normal job growth and sub par IPOs.

The comments to this entry are closed.