This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Maybe when they strap-in and experience a blistering, snap-your-head-back zero-to-60 mph of 2.7 Dropping the power top (at up-to 30 mph) took 14 seconds (raising it takes 16 seconds), was a big hit with the wondering public as it disappeared and reappeared from the power trunk. seconds, their smile will be the tell for what they think.
The first thing we noticed was the performancethe 300 horsepower and 354 pound-feet of torque comes on quick and smooth, turning 0-60 mph in about 4.7 Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. The torque is available anytime and at any speed, which made easy merging onto U.S.
0-60 mph: 4.5 of torque 0-60 mph: 5.0 The driving experience was pleasant and even enjoyable with all the performance needed, as 0-60 mph in 4.3 Doing a price comparison, including the cost of fuel and maintenance, the Lightning Pro matches very well against the competition, especially as a work truck.
Smooth looks, longer range, more power Front-Wheel Drive Single motor Horsepower: XLE: 168; XLE Plus and Limited: 221 0-60 mph: 8.0 We now have spirited acceleration from a stop or, when on the freeway at 60 mph and needing to pass traffic, jumping up to 70 mph quickly. seconds Battery: XLE: 57.7 kWh; XLE Plus and Limited: 74.7
Fuel economy numbers reported by Clean Fleet Report are non-scientific and represent the reviewer’s driving experience using the dash gauge computer. Power is sent to all four wheels through a continuously variable transmission (CVT), with 0-60 mph runs at about 6.2 Your numbers may differ.
We made 0-60 mph runs in 7.1 Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market. seconds, which was fine for freeway merging and passing big rigs.
Just showing off steering enhancements Performance Excitement If you have driven any electric vehicle you know the acceleration is fast and quick, with some manufacturers trying to out do each other with the shortest time to 60 or 100 mph. second 0-60 mph time is very believable. The claimed 3.5 Anyway you look at it, it is a blast!
Taming a Beast The all-wheel drive (AWD) 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5N is powered by dual motors that scoot it along 0-60 mph in a seat-pinning 3.4 We do not recommend or encourage trying this, but the top speed is set at 162 mph. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
Using the adaptive cruise control set between 65 and 70 mph and selecting the Normal drive mode, we averaged 50.3 Fuel economy numbers reported by Clean Fleet Report are non-scientific and represent the reviewers driving experience. Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
The performance was impressive, with the i4 returning 0-60 mph runs at 5.5 It’s a hatchback The i4 comes with an acoustic pedestrian protection system, which is an artificially generated false engine sounds, pumped through exterior speakers, that are active when driving up to 19 mph. miles per kilowatt-hour. seconds Battery: 83.9
The performance was impressive, with the 5,681-pound EQE returning 0-60 mph runs at 4.7 There are eight interior color options with three having an additional cost. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. That’s the beauty of EV torque.
0-60 mph: 4.5 0-60 mph: 3.4 0-60 mph: 2.9 0-60 mph: 2.5 Heavy performance Performance Excitement If you have driven any electric vehicle, you know the acceleration is fast and quick, with some manufacturers trying to outdo each other with the shortest time to 60 or 100 mph. Photos by John Faulkner and Rivian. [
of torque 91 kWh maximum/86 kWh usable 11 kW onboard charger 0 – 60 mph: 6.9 of torque rear 91 kWh maximum/86 kWh usable 11 kW onboard charger 0 – 60 mph: 6.0 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. Photos by John Faulkner and Volkswagen. [
In a few 0-60 mph runs we averaged a respectable 7.5 miles per kWh to be very efficient considering we spent some of our time at 70+ mph, which an EV’s battery does not like. The pixel LED head lights have active high beam detection, automatic leveling and corner illumination that turn the lights up to 15 degrees, at speeds to 25 mph.
Scooting 0-60 mph is about 7.2 The top speed is set at 104 mph, but we highly recommend not pushing it that high. Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market.
Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market. We welcome any feedback from vehicle owners and are dedicated to providing a forum for alternative viewpoints.
The amended bill, now called the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012” and next to be considered by the House, contains 12 extensions outlined in Title IV of the bill, ranging from extension of production credits for Indian coal facilities to benefits for alternativefuels (including algal biofuels) and plug-in vehicles.
Natural gas and other alternativefuel vehicle technology is basically mature, the government said, and is headed toward initial industrialization. kW/kg, at a cost of 200 yuan/kW. 2012 Chinese Auto Industry Development Report. Wh), with a cycle life of 2,000 or more than 10 years;and. Electric drive system power density of 2.5
billion worldwide—by 2050, this may not be achievable through improvements to the traditional internal combustion engine or alternativefuels: the traditional combustion engine is expected to improve by 30%, so achieving full decarbonisation is not possible through efficiency alone.
Hyundai will initially offer the Tucson Fuel Cell to customers in the Los Angeles/Orange County region for $499 per month for a 36-month term, with $2,999 down. When we spoke to customers interesting in driving a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, many wondered what the cost of hydrogen would be.
The CityCat model will clock out at 68 mph with a driving range of 125 miles. The cost of a fill up is approximately $2.00. 18% Alternativefuel hybrid. 37% Higher fuel economy. If the manufacturers have no surprises up their exhaust pipes the car will be practical and reasonably priced. 39% Plug-in hybrids.
As with any alternativefuel, be it CNG, LPG, electricity, hydrogen or E85, one of the challenges facing its adoption is both the availability of the fuel as well as the mechanics of refueling. We’ll set aside the business challenges facing alternativefuel providers.). Equipped by default with a 4.10
seconds, the 1/4 mile at 118 mph and, if you’re daring enough to do so, spin the dual electric motors to their maximum of 161 miles per hour. 0-60 mph: 7.2 Electronically controlled top speed: 115 mph. 0-60 mph: 7.2 Electronically controlled top speed: 117 mph. 0-60 mph: 3.4 Single electric motor.
0 – 60 mph: Up to 4.5 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market. Towing capacity: 8,000 pounds for the WT; 10,000 pounds for the RST.
For highway driving along with the super quiet ride (60 dBA @ 70 mph) it was enjoyable and never fatiguing. The top speed of 117 mph for the AWD version is close to the performance BMW i4 M50 we recently tested. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
As a test, part of those miles were driven with the cruise control set at 65 mph where we averaged 44 mpg, and at 60 mph resulting in 51.4 Fuel economy numbers reported by Clean Fleet Report are non-scientific and represent the reviewer’s driving experience using the dash gauge computer.
Running on regular unleaded, our Southern California road tripping covered 499 miles, with the majority on highways and traveling no faster than 70 mph. The average fuel economy was 46.3 70-mile run at 45 mph: 58.6 90-mile run at 65 mph: 48.7 mpg average (Rush hour, on-and-off the brakes). liter 4-cylinder engine.
In 240 miles driving around Southern California we averaged 23 mpg, but in a 100-mile run with the adaptive cruise control set at 65 mph, we averaged 31.2 This fuel economy is encouraging, but it will take a wide open road with little traffic and lots of patience to equal it. Zero-to-60 mph times were right around 5.0
non-turbocharged engine and the IVT (Kia engineers take on the continuously variable transmission), which offers better fuel economy of the two models we tested in and around Austin. seconds 0-60 mph. seconds, 0-60 mph. Because of this we dont address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
In a few unofficial runs, the Prius AWD we were driving, with dual motors and 196 horsepower and 139 pound-feet of torque, did 0-60 mph in about 7.0 Toyota lists the Prius FWD with a single motor going 0-60 mph in 7.2 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
The interior is serene with a 70-mph sound measurement of 65 dB, which is in Rolls Royce territory. Luckily top speed is limited to 120 mph. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. Looking and feeling like every F-150, but not.
In Utah the posted limit is 80 mph and for many drivers that was only a suggestion. We set the cruise control to 72 mph when on the freeway. Electrify America’s charging network were the backbone of our trip Cost Comparison We charged 412.23 kWh over the 1,796-mile trip at an estimated retail cost of $203.
0 – 60 mph: 4.5 0 – 60 mph: 5.0 We activated Ford’s Intelligent Adaptive Cruise Control and the Blue Cruise Hands-free Driving technology to experience driving in traffic at highway speeds between 65 and 75 mph. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
Powered by a 42-kWh battery, the 500e scoots along from a stop to 60 mph in about 8.5 Its top speed is 94 mph. Sherpa also limits the top speed to 50 mph, turns-off the heating and air conditioning, and reduces the power, but does not restrict a full throttle if needed.
The one in WTF mode (Watts To Freedom in GM’s sanitized parlance) that takes the 9,200-pound pickup 0-60 mph in three seconds? If you have driven any electric vehicle, you know the acceleration is quick, with manufacturers trying to outdo each other with the shortest time to 60 or 100 mph. Like Nothing Else On the Road.
0 – 60 mph: 7.1 0 – 60 mph: 6.5 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market. of torque. kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery. kW onboard charger.
Acceleration was peppy, in the mid-five-second range to 60 mph, which is about two seconds faster than the single motor rear-wheel drive ID4. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. Underneath the ID4 is VW’s basic EV platform. The Driving Experience.
Ford’s Trail Control technology enables a cruise control-like setting, up-to 20 mph forward and 6 mph in reverse, for vehicle-controlled throttle and braking, letting the driver stay focused on navigating the trail. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
with 0-60 mph times of 5.9 of torque and gets to 60 mph in 4.1 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. In addition, we aim to offer reviews and news on advanced technology and the alternativefuel vehicle market. of torque that is good for 4.3
We did a bit better on a 120-mile freeway run with the adaptive cruise control set at 65 mph, achieving 28.1 Selecting the Sport mode for that extra oomph helped turn 0-60 mph in about 6.3 Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership.
seconds from 50 to 70 mph, made passing Semi trucks and motorhomes a breeze. The LED Active Bending head and fog lights turn up to 15 degrees at speeds of up to 25 mph, illuminating curves. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. The 0 to 60 time of 6.8
This results in a 0-60 time of four seconds (it felt quicker) and a top speed of 155 mph, which we didn’t quite get to, lifting-off at 120 mph. Because of this we don’t address issues such as long-term reliability or total cost of ownership. Shhh, don’t tell the CHP ).
EPA fuel economy numbers for the 1.5L A 100-mile piece of those miles was an all-freeway run with the adaptive cruise control set at 65 mph and in Eco mode, returning 32.1 Fuel economy numbers reported by Clean Fleet Report are non-scientific and represent the reviewer’s driving experience using the dash gauge computer.
Playing with the drive modes tells the story of how performance and fuel economy can be affected. On a straight, flat section of freeway at 65 mph in Tour drive mode, the tachometer was showing 1,500 rpm. mpg, with 180 miles on an all-freeway run with the cruise control set at 65 mph and in Tour, we averaged 31.2
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content