Elevance Renewable Sciences licenses molybdenum and tungsten metathesis catalysts from XiMo
California ARB begins second year of grants for hybrid trucks and buses

UK study concludes cumulative global sales of EVs could reach 30M units by 2050, or 1.5% of projected global car parc; decisive global action required

A new review of the global market prospects for electric vehicles by UK-based Trend Tracker Ltd concludes that given a steady increase in producer investment; positive legislative and fiscal influences and consumer acceptance, and subject to requisite technical advances, by 2050 the cumulative sales of electric cars could feasibly reach 30 million units—approximately 1.5% of the global car parc (2 billion units) projected for then.

With a vehicle lifecycle of around 15 years, the global electric car population might by then reach about the same total as cumulative production, some of the later EVs sold having replaced older EVs that had been scrapped, the report, “Electric Vehicles: Energy, infrastructure and the mobility market in the real world”, notes.

“Without decisive fiscal and investment policies on a global scale, private road transport’s absolute volume and share of greenhouse gas emissions will continue to rise.”
—Trend Tracker report

Interacting EV market driver variables will include installed production capacity (currently about 0.5 million units/year); the availability of subsidies and incentives; the availability of an extensive and expensive recharging infrastructure and adequate energy supplies; the future cost of oil; and the cost of meeting transport emissions legislation through means other than EV production.

The report notes that the lead-in time for new automotive powertrain technologies is forecast to be about 20 years—supported by the slow advance of hybrids to date. There is also considerable inertia built into the car market due to the longevity of vehicles. Allowing for this, the report concludes, to effectively electrify the global car market by 2050—by which time the exhaustion of oil reserves may make electrification an urgent necessity—EV production would need to increase by an average 2 million units/year over 23 years.

The 30-million unit figure is considerably more conservative that some cited within the report, which Trend Tracker calls“apparently less forecasts than statements of intent or pious hope”.

We would argue that EVs represent such game-changing technology in respect of vehicle performance and price that any assumptions that capacity for substantially expanded EV production will be absorbed by markets in the same way as conventional vehicle capacity are liable to be unsafe.

Demand already supplied by EV manufacturers is from ‘early adopters’ and fleets, and the motivations and behaviour of these buyers are substantially different from the behaviours of the majority of new and used car buyers, in mature and emerging markets alike.

The evolution of demand cannot safely be mapped for products which are not yet available, products which do not match the criteria consumers apply to the products that EVs are intended to replace. The most reliable market drivers, then, will be production capacity, the subsidies available to incentivise consumers to purchase EVs, and the cost of oil, or emissions legislation, which may or may not prove persuasive. However, both these market drivers are essentially contingent on the willingness and ability of governments to use tax revenues to fund EV purchase incentives and associated infrastructure investments.

—“Electric Vehicles: Energy, infrastructure and the mobility market in the real world, 2011”

Without “decisive action”to implement ambitious fiscal and investment policies on a global scale to support a rapidly accelerated market penetration of electric cars, the great majority of cars in circulation by 2025, even 2050, will still be dependent on fossil fuels, according to the report. And without a major shift away from fossil fuels, transport’s absolute volume and share of greenhouse gas emissions will continue to rise as personal mobility increases in the growth markets in Asia.

The 242-page report comprises assessments of a number of aspects of the EV industry and market, including EV and alternative powertrain technologies; battery technologies; electric vehicles and power generation; recharging infrastructure; critical resources; market forecasts; fiscal policies and electrification; business models and strategic issues for electric mobility providers; and profiles of EV and battery manufacturers.

Challenges and issues discussed in this report include:

  • To compete with advancing gasoline/diesel engines, EV traction batteries have to be much more than twice as energy dense as lithium-ion ever will be, at least three times cheaper, and last much longer before replacement.

  • For EVs to take off, conventional cars have to become less and less attractive—but in fact they’re still getting better, cheaper to buy, and cheaper to run, thanks to the same emissions legislation that seeks to privilege EVs.

  • Privately-owned EVs will need both standard voltage sockets for domestic, off-peak overnight recharging, and recharging points at work and other destinations and en route, where time and demand constraints may require access to fast-charging facilities. The report explores the potential of battery exchange as an alternative to multiple public EV recharging points as a case study of Better Place, with the conclusion that it is incompatible with present battery unit costs, and with competitive energy markets.

  • Massive petroleum tax revenues need to be replaced if mobility goes electric.

  • Without decisive implementation of effective fiscal and investment policies on a global scale, which few governments may consider affordable, private road transport’s absolute volume and share of greenhouse gas emissions will continue to rise.

  • Smart grids and more storage will be essential to managing more intermittent renewable energy supply and extra power demand from EVs. Can EVs truly contribute to grid balancing?

  • With radically reduced parts consumption and probable high depreciation, EVs represent a strategic threat to the standard automotive industry business model. Meanwhile, alternative new powertrain technologies are fragmenting vehicle production and markets.

Trend Tracker Ltd was formed in the UK in 2003 by experienced specialists as a company dedicated to providing accurate and informed automotive industry research. It undertakes bespoke client studies and publishes its own reports.

Comments

HarveyD

Everybody seems to underestimate the potential penetration of electrified vehicles in the next 30 years or so.

Asian countries such as Japan, South Korea, China together with India etc will lead the way. An increase on 2M EVs per year will be surpassed much before 2040. The majority of new vehicles coming to the market by 2030 (or a few years before) will be partly or fully electrified. They may not all be 4 x 4 monsters.

DaveD

Yeah, and the price of gas will always be $2.89/gallon in the US...Whatever. Morons.

They couldn't predict the weather tomorrow but they think they can tell us the price of gas, batteries, the penetration of EVs or FCVs or anything else in 20 years????

Waste of the digital trees they killed to send the report out. LOL

Treehugger

everybody except you Harvey...

All these projections at 40 years are BS, we just don't know. there is so many unknown parameters (like the price of oil) , only one thing is for sure is that such a transition (from ICE to EV) cannot be that fast, look at the wind energy 20 years after its introduction it produces only 1.5% of electricity made worldwide, so why the EV cars penetration would go much faster ? is there a good reason to think that it would go faster ? please fill me in

mahonj

I think there will be a very large demand for partially electric cars within 10 years, with a spectrum from mild hybrid through full hybrid, PHEV and full electric.

As manufacturers learn more about hybrids, the premium will become so small that nearly all cars will have some degree of electrification.

PHEvs and BEvs are a different matter and will not become popular without breakthroughs in battery technology.

I do not see the price of gasoline going down in the medium term as demand from China and India etc will keep it high (or very high).

The demand from these two huge populations will be so large that recessions in the west or ICE innovations will not hold it back.

So while it is more or less impossible to predict 40 years hence, we can say that demand for gasoline will increase hugely, but we will find some way to replace it (could even be natural gas hybrid cars).

danm

TreeHugger,
Wind turbines are not something that individual people buy. But people do buy autos, and when EVs become better and more affordable people will want them.
-
Comparing a product that utilities purchase (wind turbines) to EVs is not apples to apples.

danm

When the price of the chevy Volt gets down to 20K they won't be able to build them fast enough.
(and when the electric range gets up around 100 miles).

Treehugger

danm

so your are stating that a consumer market always grows faster than a utility market ? and what is the rational behind that statement? The consumer market can only grow fast if the price is really low enough and 2nd if the supply can keep up, slashing the price of the Volt by a factor 2 is not going to be that straightforward like Mahonj says, we need breakthrough, the technology of battery is not ready for mass EV market.

HarveyD

We went from horses and buggies in about 4 decades and we could go from ICE to electrified vehicles even faster.

Not all vehicles will be electrified to the same level. Here are a few examples;

1995/1996 mass produced (short lived) BEVs

1997/1998 first Toyota HEV, over 1.5 M by end of 2011

2008/2010 many other mass produced HEVs

2009/2010 mass produced Tesla BEVs

2010/2011 mass produced Volt PHEVs

2010/2011 mass produced Leaf BEVs

2011/2012 many more mass produced HEVs, PHEVs from 10+ manufacturers.

2013/2014 many more mass produced BEVs from 10+ manufacturers.

2013/2015 mass produced FC from 3 or 4 manufacturers.

2015/2016 worldwide 4M to 5M +/year new electrified vehicles (HEVs, PHEVs, BEVs FC, buses, trains, trucks etc)

2020/2021 worldwide 8M to 10M+/year new electrified vehicles from 20+ different manufacturers

Post 2030/2031 Progressive accelerated transition to electrified vehicles worldwide. BEVs could have the fastest growth.

If somebody wanted to compare oranges with apples, the world will go from almost zero Tablet PCs to over 50 million in less than 24 months and to over 100 million in about 48 months and the price will go down from over $1000 to about $100 for the high definition 10-inch multi-touch, Wifi g/n, webcam equipped Android OS model. Of course electrified vehicles transition will never go that fast.

danm

TreeH, Just saying that utilites are conservative and cautious when spending millions.
Individuals can make a decision faster when they see the right product. But gotta agree that batteries are the bottleneck and predictions are BS.
And your point about the slow growth of wind energy is thought provoking and sobering.

Engineer-Poet

TH, it's worse than that; the first megawatt-scale commercial wind turbine in the USA was built in the 1940's! Of course, one can argue that it was under-engineered and overly ambitious, and our improved materials have removed the roadblocks to adoption. In recent years, US wind power production has expanded fast enough to run several million new EVs each year, and the fraction kept increasing.

I'm certain that 30 million EVs globally is a ridiculously small number for 2050. All it takes is fuel prices on the order of $5/gallon to make plug-in hybrids economic, and we're very close to this even in the USA. If 50% of the vehicle fleet is some sort of plug-in from 2030 and total US production averages 14 million/yr, that's 140 million plug-ins by 2050 in the USA alone.

Reel$$

"We would argue that EVs represent such game-changing technology in respect of vehicle performance and price that any assumptions that capacity for substantially expanded EV production will be absorbed by markets in the same way as conventional vehicle capacity are liable to be unsafe."

WTF?? This is assuredly THE most inane and incompetent statement we've read in a GCC-published "study." Please GCC, do NOT publish more incomprehensible tripe from these "Trend Trackers!"

Thomas Lankester

@TreeHugger
'why the EV cars penetration would go much faster ? is there a good reason to think that it would go faster ? please fill me in'

It comes down to generation time. Cars have a life expectancy of ~15 years compared to power plant service lives of 30-60 years (e.g. for the GenIII nuclear plants in construction). So in 30 years time a tiny percentage of current new cars will still be on the road but most of the new generating plant will be. Utilities are far more effectively locked in to current tech than private car drivers, some of whom change cars every 2 years.

It is a completely different market dynamic. If you want another example, look at the turn over of consumer electronics such as laptops or mobile phones. The generation time on mobile phones is so low that 3G swept through developing nations in just a few years.

Engineer-Poet
'why the EV cars penetration would go much faster ? is there a good reason to think that it would go faster ?
You seem to be unfamiliar with the phenomenon in the USA around the oil-price shocks.

The late 60's and early 70's were the age of muscle cars, large-block V8's getting well under 10 MPG. When the oil-price shocks hit, you couldn't give these cars away. They went to the crusher in record numbers and the Ford Pinto, Dodge Omni and Chevy Chevette became best-selling vehicles.

If we get sustained fuel prices of $3.50/gallon, we'll see a move towards 40+ MPG gas-burning cars, diesels and electrics. If we get $5/gallon that won't be a move, it will be a stampede.

Reel$$

Aside from the astonishing incompetent use of the English language - this "report" offers nothing of value. What IS interesting and on-topic is the WSJ article today documenting Exxon's failed reserve replacement rate:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704409004576146362117313094.html

...the company said that for every 100 barrels it has pumped out of the earth over the past decade, it has replaced only 95.

Herein lie the seeds of peak oil.

PSU Student

Tell me what you think about Green Cars and renewable energy. I'm a
student at Portland State University and I'm part of a research
project that is trying to see what people REALLY think about electric
and CNG cars. Visit our website and take our survey!

http://www.ecopolproject.blogspot.com/

The comments to this entry are closed.