Energy Biosciences Institute Adds Microbially Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery Project
IATA Calls for Government-Industry Alignment on Aviation Emissions; Biofuels May be Certified by 2010

House Chairmen Waxman, Markey Release Draft of Energy and Climate Legislation; Among the Many Provisions Are Cap-and-Trade, Harmonization of CAFE and California Vehicle Regulations, and Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Chairman Henry A. Waxman of the Energy and Commerce Committee and Chairman Edward J. Markey of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee on Tuesday released a draft of far-reaching energy and climate legislation that targets job creation, promotes renewables and energy efficiency, and places limits on emissions of greenhouse gases. The bill also establishes an interagency council to ensure an integrated federal response to adapting to the effects of global warming.

Among the direct transportation-related provisions in the extensive package are a low-carbon fuel standard for all transportation fuels; financial support for large scale demonstrations of electric vehicles; and financial support for automakers retooling plants to make electric vehicles. The bill also directs the President to work with the relevant Federal agencies and California to harmonize, to the maximum extent possible, the federal fuel economy standards, any emission standards promulgated by EPA, and the California standards for light-duty vehicles. Any Federal vehicle standards are to achieve at least the results of the California standards.

The bill also modifies the Clean Air Act to require the development of greenhouse gas emissions standards for all other mobile sources—e.g., trucks, construction machines, ships and planes.

One key issue that the Waxman-Markey discussion draft does not address is how to allocate the tradable emission allowances that restrict the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from electric utilities, oil companies, and other sources. The Chairmen say this issue will be addressed through discussions among Committee members. The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES) has four titles:

  • A clean energy title that promotes renewable sources of energy, carbon capture and sequestration technologies, low-carbon fuels, electric vehicles, and the smart grid and electricity transmission;

  • An energy efficiency title that increases energy efficiency across all sectors of the economy, including buildings, appliances, transportation, and industry;

  • A global warming title that places limits on emissions of heat-trapping pollutants; and

  • A transitioning title intended to protect US consumers and industry and promotes green jobs during the transition to a clean energy economy.

(Sections and provisions directly related to transportation are shaded.)

Title I, Clean Energy has six subsections (with a seventh providing technical corrections to existing energy laws):

  • Renewable Energy. The draft establishes a Renewable Portfolio Standard—i.e., power from renewable sources—wind, solar, geothermal, biomass or landfill gas, hydropower, and marine and hydrokinetic—for retail electricity suppliers beginning at 6% in 2012 and gradually rising to 25% in 2025 and continuing at that level through 2039. The governor of any state may choose to meet one fifth of this requirement with energy efficiency measures.

  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration. The draft promotes development of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies to establish a continuing place for coal in the US energy mix. The draft includes a CCS early demonstration program, incentives for the wide-scale commercial deployment of CCS, and performance standards for new coal-fired power plants.

  • Clean Fuels and Vehicles. The draft establishes a new low-carbon transportation fuel standard (LCFS) to promote advanced biofuels and other clean transportation fuels. Implementing the LCFS would be a lengthy process. Within three years of enactment, the EPA would need to determine the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of all transportation fuels and determine the fuel emission baseline.

    For each year from 2014 through 2022, the annual average lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, per unit of energy as determined by the Administrator of the EPA, of transportation fuel, excluding renewable fuel must not exceed the baseline.

    From 2023 to 2030, the annual average lifecycle greenhouse gas emission would need to be at least 5% below the baseline. For 2030 and later, the annual average lifecycle greenhouse gas emission is at least 10% below the fuel emission baseline.

    The bill requires electric utilities to draw up plans to implement a charging infrastructure for plug-in vehicles (that can include battery swapping, fast charging and other services). It also would establish financial support for large-scale demonstrations of plug-in electric drive vehicles, and provide financial assistance to manufacturers of plug-in electric drive vehicles.

  • Smart Grid and Electricity Transmission. The draft contains provisions to facilitate the deployment of a smart grid, including measures to reduce utility peak loads through smart grid and demand response applications and to help promote smart grid capabilities in new home appliances. It also directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to reform the regional planning process to modernize the electric grid and provide for new transmission lines to carry electricity generated from renewable sources.

  • Partnering with the States. The draft creates a program to allow each state energy office to establish a State Energy and Environment Development (SEED) Fund, which will serve as a common repository for federal financial assistance for clean energy and energy efficiency projects.

  • Federal Purchases of Renewable Electricity. The draft authorizes federal agencies to enter into long-term contracts to purchase renewable electricity.

Title II, Energy Efficiency, has seven subsections:

  • Building Energy Efficiency. The draft promotes energy efficiency in new buildings by providing federal training and funding assistance to states that adopt advanced building efficiency codes. It authorizes funding for retrofitting existing commercial and residential buildings to improve their energy efficiency. And it directs the Environmental Protection Agency to develop procedures for rating building energy efficiency.

  • Manufactured Homes. The draft provides rebates to low-income families residing in pre-1976 manufactured homes that can be applied toward purchases of new Energy Star-rated manufactured homes.

  • Appliance Energy Efficiency. The draft codifies four negotiated agreements on efficiency standards for lighting and four additional agreements for other appliances. It makes numerous improvements to the current Department of Energy process for setting energy-efficiency standards, strengthening the cost-effectiveness test to establish minimum standards and requiring improved disclosure. In addition, it creates a program to provide financial incentives to retailers who sell high volumes of “Best-in-Class” appliances.

  • Transportation Efficiency. The draft directs the President to work with the relevant agencies and California to harmonize, to the maximum extent possible, the federal fuel economy standards, any emission standards promulgated by EPA, and the California standards for light-duty vehicles. The goal of this provision is to preserve the environmental benefits that could be achieved by the three standards, but do so in a way that simplifies compliance by the auto companies.

    Among the specified parameters of this directive, the new standards “must achieve at least as much emissions reductions as would be achieved by implementation of the California law AB 1493 if enforced in the State of California and the other States that have adopted the standard; and do not preempt California’s legal authority to adopt and enforce its own mobile source emissions standards.”

    The proposed bill would modify Title VIII of the Clean Air Act to direct the Administrator of the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of greenhouse gases from non-Tier II (i.e., light duty vehicles—e.g., heavy duty on-road vehicles, off-road vehicles, locomotives, marine and aviation engines.

    The draft requires states to establish goals for reducing global warming pollution from the transportation sector and requires large metropolitan planning organizations to submit transportation plans to meet those goals. The draft authorizes EPA to carry out the SmartWay Transportation Efficiency Program to increase the efficiency of highway trucking.

  • Utilities Energy Efficiency. The draft establishes a new energy efficiency resource standard to enlist electricity and natural gas distribution companies in the effort to make the nation more energy efficient. Under this program, each distribution company must demonstrate that its customers have achieved a required level of cumulative electricity or natural gas savings relative to business-as-usual projections. The efficiency standard starts with a 1% electricity savings and 0.75% natural gas savings in 2012 and gradually increases to a 15% cumulative electricity savings and a 10% cumulative natural gas savings by 2020.

  • Industrial Energy Efficiency. The draft requires the Secretary of Energy to establish standards for industrial energy efficiency and to seek recognition of the result by the American National Standards Institute. The draft also creates an award program for innovation in increasing efficiency of thermal electric generation process.

  • Public and Federal Energy Efficiency. The draft amends the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to include nonprofit hospitals and public health facilities among public institutions eligible for grants and loans for energy efficiency. It also requires competition before task orders are awarded by federal agencies under energy savings performance contracts.

Title III, Reducing Global Warming Pollution, (the cap-and-trade title), has eight subsections. The global warming provisions in the discussion draft are modeled closely on the recommendations of the US Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), a coalition of electric utilities, oil companies, chemical companies, automobile manufacturers, other manufacturers and energy companies, and environmental organizations.

  • Global Warming Pollution Reduction Program. The draft establishes a market-based program for reducing global warming pollution from electric utilities, oil companies, large industrial sources, and other covered entities that collectively are responsible for 85% of US global warming emissions. Under this program, covered entities must have tradable federal permits, called “allowances,” for each ton of pollution emitted into the atmosphere.

    Entities that emit less than 25,000 tons per year of CO2 equivalent are not covered by this program. The program reduces the number of available allowances issued each year to ensure that aggregate emissions from the covered entities are reduced by 3% below 2005 levels in 2012, 20% below 2005 levels in 2020, 42% below 2005 levels in 2030, and 83% below 2005 levels in 2050.

  • Supplemental Pollution Reductions. The draft directs EPA to achieve additional reductions in global warming pollution by entering into agreements to prevent international deforestation. By 2020, these supplemental reductions will achieve reductions equivalent to 10% of US emissions in 2005. These are low-cost reductions in global warming pollution that can be secured by devoting approximately 5% of the allowance value to the program.

  • Offsets. The draft allows covered entities to increase their emissions above their allowances if they can obtain “offsetting” reductions at lower cost from other sources. The total quantity of offsets allowed in any year cannot exceed 2 billion tons, split evenly between domestic and international offsets. Covered entities using offsets must submit five tons of offset credits for every four tons of emissions being offset.

  • Banking and Borrowing. To provide additional flexibility without compromising environmental goals, the draft permits unlimited banking of allowances for use during future compliance years. The draft also establishes a rolling two-year compliance period, effectively allowing covered entities to borrow from one year ahead without penalty. Allowances from two to five years in the future can be borrowed under limited circumstances.

  • Strategic Reserve. The draft directs EPA to create a “strategic reserve” of about 2.5 billion allowances by setting aside a small number of allowances authorized to be issued each year thereby creating a cushion in case prices rise faster than expected. The draft directs EPA to make allowances from the reserve available through an auction when allowance prices rise to unexpectedly high levels. The proceeds of the auction will be used to purchase additional offsets that will replenish the strategic reserve.

  • Carbon Market Assurance and Oversight. The draft provides for strict oversight and regulation of the new markets for carbon allowances and offsets. It ensures market transparency and liquidity and establishes strict penalties for fraud and manipulation. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is charged with regulating the cash market in emission allowances and offsets. The President is directed to delegate regulatory responsibility for the derivatives market to an appropriate agency (or agencies), based on the advice of an interagency working group.

  • Additional Greenhouse Gas Standards. The draft directs EPA to set emission standards on sources that are not covered by the allowance system. In addition, it creates special programs to reduce emissions of two pollutants that contribute to global warming: hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and black carbon. HFCs are chemical products that are used in refrigeration, air conditioning, and insulation, among other things. The draft adds HFCs to the list of similar substances that EPA currently regulates because they deplete the ozone layer.

    Under this regulatory program, EPA will be directed to phase down the production of HFCs. Black carbon, or soot, is the product of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels or biomass. It is a major contributor to warming in the Arctic. EPA is directed in the draft to use its existing authority under the Clean Air Act to reduce emissions of black carbon domestically and study opportunities for reductions internationally.

  • Clean Air Act Exemptions. The draft provides that CO2 and other greenhouse gases may not be regulated as criteria pollutants or hazardous air pollutants on the basis of their effect on global warming. The draft also provides that new source review does not apply to these global warming pollutants.

Title IV, Transitioning to a Clean Energy Economy, has five subsections.

  • Ensuring Domestic Competitiveness. To ensure that US manufacturers are not put at a disadvantage relative to overseas competitors, the draft authorizes companies in certain industrial sectors to receive “rebates” to compensate for additional costs incurred under the program. Sectors that use large amounts of energy, and produce commodities that are traded globally, would be eligible for the rebates.

    If the President finds that the rebate provisions do not sufficiently correct competitive imbalances, the President is directed to establish a “border adjustment” program. Under that program, foreign manufacturers and importers would be required to pay for and hold special allowances to “cover” the carbon contained in US-bound products.

  • Green Jobs and Worker Transition. The draft includes several provisions to promote green jobs. One section authorizes the Secretary of Education to award grants to universities and colleges to develop curriculum and training programs that prepare students for careers in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and other forms of climate change mitigation. Under another section, the Secretary of Labor is authorized to carry out such training programs. The discussion draft also notes that a worker transition section remains to be provided.

  • Consumer Assistance. The discussion draft notes that a consumer assistance section remains to be provided.

  • Exporting Clean Technology. The discussion draft includes provisions to provide US assistance to encourage widespread deployment of clean technologies to developing countries. The draft specifies that only developing countries that have ratified an international treaty and undertaken nationally appropriate mitigation activities that achieve substantial greenhouse gas reductions are eligible for funding.

  • Adapting to Global Warming. The draft establishes an interagency council to ensure an integrated federal response to the effects of global warming. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is directed to conduct vulnerability assessments and establish a National Climate Service. Each federal agency is directed to prepare an adaptation plan, review climate impacts on matters within its jurisdiction, and develop plans for addressing those impacts.

    The draft establishes a climate change adaptation fund to provide federal support for state, local, and tribal adaptation projects and a natural resources climate change adaptation panel to coordinate interagency actions on natural resources adaptation. The draft also requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate a national strategy for adapting to the public health effects of climate change.

    To address international adaptation issues, the draft creates an International Climate Change Adaptation Program within USAID to provide US assistance to the most vulnerable developing countries for adaptation to climate change.

The Energy and Commerce Committee will complete consideration of the legislation by Memorial Day. The preliminary schedule follows:

  • Week of April 20: Energy and Environment Subcommittee Hearings
  • Week of April 27: Energy and Environment Subcommittee Markup Period Begins
  • Week of May 11: Full Energy and Commerce Committee Markup Period Begins

Resources

Comments

Will S

VERY broad and encompassing legislation. This bill covers so many interconnected and related items that having it in one place will reduce any piecemeal effect of having dozens of separate bills. I'm fully behind it, and find that it even addresses manufacturing competitiveness through rebates and additional measures if necessary.

ai_vin

Wait for it...I hear the thundering hoofs of trolls approaching at full gallop.

This is like dangling raw meat in front of them.

SJC

That distant thundering sound may be the herds of lobbyists running to get their piece of it changed in favor of their clients.

jzj

Waxman has always been ahead of the curve and now he's finally getting a chance to propose the laws that will drag the US into the 21st century and go a long way toward solving our economic, environmental, employment, trade, and geopolitical problems. Excellent stuff, all the way through. (Of course, the mainstream media will not have the diligence to properly report on this critical event.)

Matthew

There probably won't be a thundering; we're pretty worn out from reacting to all the ways our Democratic friends are trying to damage the country. If it's not the bank bailout it's the automaker takeover. And if it's not that, it's overboard environmental legislation.

Too many stupid ideas, not enough people to fight them all at once.

ai_vin

"our Democratic friends are trying to damage the country"

You can say this after the 8 years you just had? wow.

JosephT


Well let's see, in the last eight years I have bought 4 new cars, a house, had a kid, gone on vacation to New York, San Fran, Toronto, Chicago. My family income went up 40% or so and we moved back to our home state. Except for 9/11 things were going pretty well until about two years ago. Hey isn't that about the time the Dems took control of congress?

ai_vin

Gotta love that selective memory.

SJC

As long as they are doing well, it does not matter how the other 300 million people are doing.

Peter9909

Four cars in eight years? That's pretty impressive. Are you trying to set some sort of record? My family has three cars and the newest one was bought in 2004, the oldest in 1994. I really don't understand this obsession America has with new cars. Maybe 30 years ago, cars only had a lifespan of 3-5 years, but that is no longer the case.

arnold


This CCS issue is a hard nut so we see CCS demonstration plants as the only solid proposal.
While there are trials underway that monitor injected CO2 for 10 years into the future, the last I heard was that stack capture < 5%. 2%? is the best result so far.
These 1st gen trials have merely shown up the futility of the proposals, and stalld for time.
The CO2 injected for trials is especially created as a pure stream for the trials.

Fully half the energy created in fossil fuel generation is thought required to seqester ther CO2 except that it doesnt work yet and seems unlikely using traditional technologies.
The snow doctors claim much lower energy requirements for sequestration say 20 or even much less than 10%. But we know that this refers to pumping the 'pure stream' only.
As recovery from the stack is lucky to achieve 2%, the trials can only be described as meaningless.This supports claims that CCS is a delaying tactic.

The saying that Americans usually it right - after trying all other options is taken to the limit of cynical manipulation here.


" The draft includes a CCS early demonstration program, incentives for the wide-scale commercial deployment of CCS, and performance standards for new coal-fired power plants."


It,s as hard to see a solution ia this process as

" The draft includes a CCS early demonstration program, incentives for the wide-scale commercial deployment of CCS, and performance standards for new coal-fired power plants."


" Covered entities using offsets must submit five tons of offset credits for every four tons of emissions being offset."

Are they allowing 20% for losses? Or eggadurated claims in which case allow 500% minimum.

How many times do we need to read this one?
"Exporting Clean Technology: The discussion draft includes provisions to provide US assistance to encourage widespread deployment of clean technologies to developing countries."

Another example of proposals that have been suggested and confirmed for the last 4 - 5 years, but need implementation.

This bit is interesting if I read correctly.

"Clean Air Act Exemptions. The draft provides that CO2 and other greenhouse gases may not be regulated as criteria pollutants or hazardous air pollutants on the basis of their effect on global warming."
"The draft also provides that new source review does not apply to these global warming pollutants."

More

"In addition, it creates special programs to reduce emissions of two pollutants that contribute to global warming: hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and black carbon."

This would define CO2 as a non 'criteria' pollutant
including from new sources.
Do greenhouse promotants not contribute heat pollution?
How then can this special case be regulated?
Not quite sure then how these greenhouse promoters are classified.

It does suggest breaking up the definitions of pollutants by class and that will be acceptable to the various interest areas and groups.

It is pragmatic to allow the widest range as described here to encourage widespread acceptance.

This proposal unambigiously frames the issues for attention as clearly and precisely as we can hope for. Lets hope this proposed legislation can direct and support future efforts and direction

Clearly something is confusing the trolls.

Mark_BC

"Well let's see, in the last eight years I have bought 4 new cars, a house, had a kid, gone on vacation to New York, San Fran, Toronto, Chicago. My family income went up 40% or so and we moved back to our home state. Except for 9/11 things were going pretty well until about two years ago. Hey isn't that about the time the Dems took control of congress?"

Wasn't that the problem? You were all spending like there was no tomorrow and the banks were helping you do that due to lack of regulation and the bubble burst?

Will S

Certainly the times of conspicuous overconsumption has passed, and belt-tightening will be our modus operandi for the forseeable future. Of course, the political operatives on the Right will want to shirk this off to Obama.

This legislation is years overdue, so the sooner we start, the better.

Andrey Levin

US Senate voted in 89/8/2 amendment stating:

“To amend the deficit-neutral reserve fund for climate change legislation to require that such legislation does not increase electricity or gasoline prices.”

This amendment effectively kills any meaningful cap-and-trade or carbon tax legislation, for now at least.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00117

ExDemo

The pair of dimmest of dim-bulbs submit their Cap and Trade fraud for Fire and Brimstone old-time southern preacherman for Nature worship Al "Call me billionaire Cap & Trader" Gore...

jcwinnie

I was going to post something sardonic about not forgetting to pass a law that a certain percentage of new vehicles need to be painted white to increase albedo, but even gallows humor falls short when you consider the magnitude that such falsity in policy making represents.

If we don't stop coal, then that's it. GAME OVER. And, we the People, obviously lack the capacity to do the right thing. Since we persist in our denial, e.g., the Clean Coal Lie, we deserve to fail.

HarveyD

Mark BC:

You are right on but not too many will admit it.

The majority fell into the Administration/ Bank traps and spent until the buble burst.

Keeping the Banks afloat with up to $1T may create a larger financial bubble within a few years, if people don't avoid similar traps. How long will it take for morgages to be downsized closer to properties real values and those $100K credit cards to be paid off?

The comments to this entry are closed.