Audi highlights its range of electrification efforts; Q7 diesel PHEV, A7 fuel cell PHEV, BEV, 48V and more; 750 Wh/l by 2025
VW brings Golf GTE Sport Concept plug-in hybrid to LA Auto Show

ICCT benchmarking report finds wide 51% gap between most- and least- fuel-efficient transatlantic airlines

The gap between the most- (Norwegian Air Shuttle) and least- (British Airways) fuel-efficient airlines on 2014 transatlantic operations was 51%—roughly twice the performance gap between the best and worst US airlines on domestic operations (25% in 2014), according to a newly released study by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). The new report is an extension of ICCT’s work benchmarking US airline fuel efficiency on domestic operations since 2010 (earlier post).

The gap in carbon intensity on international flights is larger than expected, which holds implication for ongoing efforts by policymakers to constrain emissions growth.

The 50%+ gap in fuel efficiency suggests there is a large and underestimated potential for in-sector CO2 emission reductions. This highlights the role for additional policies to limit aviation emissions, notably the CO2 standard being developed by the international civil aviation organization (ICAO) and a global market-based measure (MBM) to price aviation carbon.

—“Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014”

The new ICCT report compared the top 20 airlines on transatlantic routes in terms of fuel efficiency (i.e., carbon intensity) in 2014. Among the highlights of the report:

  • The three least-efficient airlines (Lufthansa, SAS, and British Airways) were collectively responsible for one-fifth of transatlantic available seat kilometers and burned 44%-51% more fuel per passenger kilometer than the most efficient.

  • A nonstop round-trip transatlantic flight averaged about one tonne of CO2 emissions per passenger, equivalent to emissions from a 35-kilometer daily commute in a Toyota Prius over a work year.

  • Seating configuration and aircraft fuel burn (i.e., fuel economy of the aircraft operated) are the two most important factors influencing airline fuel efficiency; together they explain about 80% of the variation in fuel efficiency among the airlines studied.

  • Passenger load factor (i.e., percentage of seats filled) and freight carriage are relatively less important drivers of fuel efficiency.

  • Airlines that have invested in new, advanced aircraft are significantly more fuel-efficient than airlines flying older planes, highlighting the crucial role of technology (and thus performance standards) in driving down fuel consumption and associated carbon emissions.

  • The impact of premium seating on emissions is substantial: first class and business seats accounted for only 14% of available seat kilometers flown on transatlantic routes but approximately one-third of total carbon emissions. For carriers such as British Airways and Swiss, premium seating was responsible for almost one-half of their total emissions from passenger travel.

Aircraft emitted about 700 million metric tons of CO2 in 2013. Absent policy interventions, aviation emissions are on pace to triple by 2050—a period in which many developed countries hope to reduce their emissions by up to 80%.

The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT)
Fuel efficiency of the top 20 airlines on transatlantic routes, 2014. Source: ICCT. Click to enlarge.

Delegates to the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (COP 21) will be meeting in early December at Le Bourget Airport in Paris to discuss, among other issues, how to incorporate greenhouse gas emissions from international aviation into a global climate protection framework.

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has committed to develop a global framework—an aircraft CO2 standard and a framework for market-based measures—for controlling CO2 emissions from aviation by 2016. However, the process has been hampered by disagreements over how to equitably distribute reduction targets by country or carrier.

The European Union in 2012 suspended its action requiring foreign air carriers flying to or from EU airports to participate in the EU Emissions Trading System. The US Environmental Protection Agency in 2015 published a draft “endangerment finding”—the first formal step toward regulating aviation greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. The eventual outcome will be a rule to limit emissions—either US domestic enforcement of ICAO’s CO2 emission standard for new aircraft or a more stringent US–only aircraft standard.

Comments

HarveyD

The 51% gap is too wide. ICAO, IATA and local DOTs should impose CAFE style reductions. Stats should be published more often. Airlines not responding positively should pay extra carbon fees.

Davemart

'The impact of premium seating on emissions is substantial: first class and business seats accounted for only 14% of available seat kilometers flown on transatlantic routes but approximately one-third of total carbon emissions. For carriers such as British Airways and Swiss, premium seating was responsible for almost one-half of their total emissions from passenger travel.'

Wow!
Imagine how high that might have been if concerned green Tesla drivers did not invariably travel economy class to reduce their emissions!
Green in car choice, green in travel, that's the Al Gore way.

SJC

Delta was working on a biofuel program a while back, that would help also.

Steve Reynolds

"Passenger load factor (i.e., percentage of seats filled) and freight carriage are relatively less important drivers of fuel efficiency."
"The impact of premium seating on emissions is substantial."

Those two statements seem contradictory to me. What is the density difference between premium seating and empty coach seats?

SJC

What they seem to be saying is premium seating may go unfilled, apparently some of the carriers don't care.

mahonj

The big gap is Norwegian which are flying the B787 while the others are mostly flying older planes, some with lots of business and first class.
Hence, BA is so bad (747 + 1st class is a lot of CO2/ seat).
Note than Norwegian is flying the 787-8 - the newer and enlarged -9 will have even better economics (when people start using it in anger).
Also, we will see the A350 and A330Neo coming onto the scene, further increasing efficiency.

Note how well Aer Lingus is doing - because they can use the A330-300 and have a small business class.

The comments to this entry are closed.